Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics www.atmos-chem-phys.net 1680-7316 1680-7324 7 2 2007 10.5194/acp-7-485-2007 http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/7/485/2007/ http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/7/485/2007/acp-7-485-2007.html http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/7/485/2007/acp-7-485-2007.pdf 485 493 2007-01-25 Persistence and photochemical decay of springtime total ozone anomalies in the Canadian Middle Atmosphere Model S. Tegtmeier susann@atmosp.physics.utoronto.ca T. G. Shepherd Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Potsdam, Germany Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada now at: Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Canada The persistence and decay of springtime total ozone anomalies over the entire extratropics (midlatitudes plus polar regions) is analysed using results from the Canadian Middle Atmosphere Model (CMAM), a comprehensive chemistry-climate model. As in the observations, interannual anomalies established through winter and spring persist with very high correlation coefficients (above 0.8) through summer until early autumn, while decaying in amplitude as a result of photochemical relaxation in the quiescent summertime stratosphere. The persistence and decay of the ozone anomalies in CMAM agrees extremely well with observations, even in the southern hemisphere when the model is run without heterogeneous chemistry (in which case there is no ozone hole and the seasonal cycle of ozone is quite different from observations). However in a version of CMAM with strong vertical diffusion, the northern hemisphere anomalies decay far too rapidly compared to observations. This shows that ozone anomaly persistence and decay does not depend on how the springtime anomalies are created or on their magnitude, but reflects the transport and photochemical decay in the model. The seasonality of the long-term trends over the entire extratropics is found to be explained by the persistence of the interannual anomalies, as in the observations, demonstrating that summertime ozone trends reflect winter/spring trends rather than any change in summertime ozone chemistry. However this mechanism fails in the northern hemisphere midlatitudes because of the relatively large impact, compared to observations, of the CMAM polar anomalies. As in the southern hemisphere, the influence of polar ozone loss in CMAM increases the midlatitude summertime loss, leading to a relatively weak seasonal dependence of ozone loss in the Northern Hemisphere compared to the observations. Austin, J., Shindell, D., Beagley, S R., Brühl, C., Dameris, M., Manzini, E., Nagashima, T., Newman, P., Pawson, S., Pitari, G., Rozanov, E., Schnadt, C. and Shepherd, T G.: Uncertainties and assessments of chemistry-climate models of the stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 1–27, 2003. Beagley, S R., de Grandpré, J., Koshyk, J N., McFarlane, N A., and Shepherd, T G.: Radiative-dynamical climatology of the first-generation Canadian Middle Atmosphere Model, Atmos.-Ocean, 35, 293–331, 1997. de Grandpré, J., Beagley, S R., Fomichev, V I., Griffioen, E., McConnell, J C., Medvedev, A S., and Shepherd, T G.: Ozone climatology using interactive chemistry: Results from the Canadian Middle Atmosphere Model, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 26 475–26 491, 2000. Eyring, V., Butchart, N., Waugh, D W., Akiyoshi, H., Austin, J., Bekki, S., Bodeker, G E., Boville, B A., Brühl, C., Chipperfield, M P., Cordero, E., Dameris, M., Deushi, M., Fioletov, V E., Frith, S M., Garcia, R R. Gettelman, A., Giorgetta, M A., Grewe, V., Jourdain, L., Kinnison, D E., Mancini, E., Manzini, E., Marchand, M., Marsh, D R., Nagashima, T., Newman, P A., Nielsen, J E., Pawson, S., Pitari, G., Plummer, D A., Rozanov, E., Schraner, M., Shepherd, T G., Shibata, K., Stolarski, R S., Struthers, H., Tian, W., and Yoshiki, M.: Assessment of temperature, trace species and ozone in chemistry-climate model simulations of the recent past, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D22308, doi:10.1029/2006JD007327, 2006. Fioletov, V E., Bodeker, G E., Miller, A J., McPeters, R D. and Stolarski, R.: Global and zonal total ozone variations estimated from ground-based and satellite measurements: 1964–2000, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4647, doi:10.1029/2001JD001350, 2002. Fioletov, V E. and Shepherd, T G.: Seasonal persistence of midlatitude total ozone anomalies, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1417, doi:10.1029/2002GL016739, 2003. Fioletov, V E. and Shepherd, T G.: Summertime total ozone variations over middle and polar latitudes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L04807, doi: 10.1029/2004GL022080, 2005. Frith, S., Stolarski, R., and Bhartia, P K.: Implications of version 8 TOMS and SBUV data for long-term trend analysis, Proceedings of the Quadrennial Ozone Symposium-2004, edited by: Zerefos, C., 65–66, 2004. Weber, M., Dhomse, S., Wittrock, F., Richter, A., Sinnhuber, B M. and Burrows, J P.: Dynamical control of NH and SH winter/spring total ozone from GOME observations in 1995-2002, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1583, doi:10.1029/2002GL016799, 2003. WMO: Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 1998, World Meteorological Organisation Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project Report No. 44, Geneva, 1999. WMO: Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2002, World Meteorological Organisation Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project Report No. 47, Geneva, 2003.