References

ACP

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

ACP

1680-7324

Copernicus GmbH

Göttingen, Germany

10.5194/acp-7-4295-2007

Sensitivity of PM2.5 to climate in the Eastern US: a modeling case study

Dawson

J. P.

¹ ² Adams

P. J.

² ³ Pandis

S. N.

¹ ⁴

Department of Chemical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA

Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA

Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Patras, 26500, Patra, Greece

22 08 2007

7 16 4295 4309

This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/7/4295/2007/acp-7-4295-2007.html

The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/7/4295/2007/acp-7-4295-2007.pdf

The individual effects of various meteorological parameters on PM2.5 concentrations in the Eastern US are examined using the PMCAMx chemical transport model so that these effects and their relative magnitudes can be better understood. A suite of perturbations in temperature, wind speed, absolute humidity, mixing height, cloud cover, and precipitation are imposed individually on base case conditions corresponding to periods in July 2001 and January 2002 in order to determine the sensitivities of PM2.5 concentrations and composition to these separate meteorological parameters. Temperature had a major effect on average PM2.5 in January (−170 ng m−3 K−1) due largely to the evaporation of ammonium nitrate and organic aerosol at higher temperatures; increases in sulfate production with increased temperature counteracted much of this decrease in July. Changes in mixing height also had major effects on PM2.5 concentrations: 73 ng m−3 (100 m)−1 in January and 210 ng m−3 (100 m)−1 in July. Changes in wind speed (30 to 55 ng m−3 %−1) and absolute humidity (15 to 20 ng m−3 %−1) also had appreciable effects on average PM2.5 concentrations. Precipitation changes had large impacts on parts of the domain (a consequence of the base case meteorology), with sensitivities to changing area of precipitation in July up to 100 ng m−3 %−1. Perturbations in cloud cover had the smallest effects on average PM2.5 concentrations. The changes in PM2.5 concentrations resulting from changing all eight meteorological parameters simultaneously were approximately within 25% or so of the sum of the changes to the eight individual perturbations. The sensitivities of PM2.5 concentrations to changes in these meteorological parameters indicate that changes in climate could potentially have important impacts on PM2.5 concentrations.

References 1

Aw, J. and Kleeman, M. J.: Evaluating the first-order effect of intraannual temperature variability on urban air pollution, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4365, doi: 10.1029/2002JD002688, 2003.

Baertsch-Ritter, N., Keller, J., Dommen, J., and Prevot, A. S. H.: Effects of various meteorological conditions and spatial emission resolutions on the ozone concentration and ROG/NOx limitation in the Milan area (I), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 423–438, 2004..

Bernard, S. M., Samet, J. M., Grambsch, A., Ebi, K. L., and Romieu, I.: The potential impact of climate variability and change on air pollution-related health effects in the United States, Environ. Health Perspect., 109, Suplm. 2, 199–209, 2001.

Bogardi, I. and Matyasovszky, I.: Estimating daily wind speed under climate change, Sol. Energy, 57, 239–248, 1996.

Brasseur, G. P., Kiehl, J. T., Müller, J.-F., Schneider, T., Granier, C., Tie, X., and Hauglustaine, D.: Past and future changes in global tropospheric ozone: Impact on radiative forcing, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 3807–3810, 1998.

Brasseur, G. P., Schultz, M., Granier, C., Saunois, M., Diehl, T., Botzet, M., Roeckner, E., and Walters, S.: Impact of climate change on the future chemical composition of the global troposphere, J. Climate, 19, 3932–3951, 2006.

Breslow, P. B. and Sailor, D.J.: Vulnerability of wind power resources to climate change in the continental United States, Renew. Energ., 27, 585–598, 2002.

Capaldo, K. P., Pilinis, C., and Pandis, S. N.: A computationally efficient hybrid approach for dynamic gas/aerosol transfer in air quality models, Atmos. Environ., 34, 3617–3627, 2000.

Cess, R. D., Potter, G. L., Blanchet, J. P., Boer, G. J., DelGengio, A. D., Déqué, M., Dymnikov, V., Galin, V., Gates, W. L., Ghan, S. J., Kiehl, J. T., Lacis, A. A., LeTreut, H., Li, Z.-X., Liang, X.-Z., McAvaney, B. J., Meleshko, V. P., Mitchell, J. F. B., Morcrette, J.-J., Randall, D. A., Rikus, L., Roeckner, E., Royer, J. F., Schlese, U., Sheinin, D. A., Slingo, A., Sokolov, A. P., Taylor, K. E., Washington, W. M., Wetherald, R. T., Yagai, I., and Zhang, M.-H.: Intercomparison and interpretation of climate feedback processes in 19 atmospheric general circulation models, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 16 601–16 615, 1990.

Chang, J. S., Brost, R. A., Isaksen, I. S. A., Madronich, S., Middleton, P., Stockwell, W. R., and Walcek, C. J.: A three-dimensional Eulerian acid deposition model: Physical concepts and formulation, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 14 681–14 700, 1987.

Dawson, J. P., Adams, P. J., and Pandis, S. N.: Sensitivity of ozone to summertime climate in the Eastern US: A modeling case study, Atmos. Environ., 41, 1494–1511, 2007.

Elminir, H. K.: Dependence of urban air pollutants on meteorology, Sci. Total Environ., 350, 225–237, 2005.

Environ International Corporation (Environ): User's guide: Comprehensive air quality model with extensions (CAMx), Version 4.02, Environ International Corporation, Novato, California, 2004.

Fahey, K. M. and Pandis, S. N.: Optimizing model performance: variable size resolution in cloud chemistry modeling, Atmos. Environ., 35, 4471–4478, 2001.

Gaydos, T. M., Pinder, R. W., Koo, B., Fahey, K. M., Yarwood, G., and Pandis, S. N.: Development and application of a three-dimensional aerosol chemical transport model, PMCAMx, Atmos. Environ., 41, 2594–2611, 2007.

Gery, M. W., Whitten, G. Z., Killus, J. P., and Dodge, M. C.: A photochemical kinetics mechanism for urban and regional scale computer modeling, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 925–956, 1989.

Godish, T.: Air quality, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, 2004.

Held, I. M. and Soden, B. J.: Water vapor feedback and global warming, Annu. Rev. Energ. Env., 25, 441–475, 2000.

Hogrefe, C., Lynn, B., Civerolo, K., Ku, J.-Y., Rosenthal, J., Rosenzweig, C., Goldberg, R., Gaffin, S., Knowlton, K., and Kinney, P. L.: Simulating changes in regional air pollution over the eastern United States due to changes in global and regional climate and emissions, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D22301, doi:10.1029/2004JD004690, 2004.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): Climate change 2001: The scientific basis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.

Johnson, C. E., Stevenson, D. S., Collins, W. J., and Derwent, R. G.: Role of climate feedback on methane and ozone studied with a coupled Ocean-Atmosphere-Chemistry model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 1723–1726, 2001.

Kappos, A. D., Bruckmann, P., Eikmann, T., Englert, N., Heinrich, U., Höppe, P., Koch, E., Krause, G. H. M., Kreyling, W. G., Rauchfuss, K., Rombout, P., Schulz-Klemp, V., Thiel, W. R., and Wichmann, H.-E.: Health effects of particles in ambient air, Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health, 207, 399–407, 2004.

Karydis, V., Tsimpidi, A., and Pandis, S. N.: Evaluation of a three-dimensional chemical transport model (PMCAMx) in the Eastern United States for all four seasons, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D14211, doi:10.1029/2006JD007890, 2007.

Koch, D., Park, J., and DelGenio, A.: Clouds and sulfate are anticorrelated: A new diagnostic for global sulfur models, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4781, doi:10.1029/2003JD003621, 2003.

Koo, B., Gaydos, T. M., and Pandis, S. N.: Evaluation of the equilibrium, dynamic, and hybrid aerosol modeling approaches, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 37, 53–64, 2003.

LADCO, Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium: Base E modeling inventory. Report prepared by Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium, http://www.ladco.org/tech/emis/BaseE/baseEreport.pdf, 2003.

Leung, L. R. and Gustafson, Jr., W. I.: Potential regional climate change and implications to U.S. air quality, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L16711, doi:10.1029/2005GL022911, 2005.

Liao, H., Chen, W.-T., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Role of climate change in global predictions of future tropospheric ozone and aerosols, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D12304, doi:10.1029/2005JD006852, 2006.

Mickley, L. J., Jacob, D. J., Field, B. D., and Rind, D.: Effects of future climate change on regional air pollution episodes in the United States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L24103, doi:10.1029/2004GL021216, 2004.

Murazaki, K. and Hess, P.: How does climate change contribute to surface ozone change over the United States?, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D05301, doi:10.1029/2005JD005873, 2006.

Norris, J. R.: Multidecadal changes in near-global cloud cover and estimated cloud cover radiative forcing, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D08206, doi:10.1029/2004JD005600, 2005.

Pandis, S. N. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Sensitivity analysis of a chemical mechanism for aqueous-phase atmospheric chemistry, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 1105–1126, 1989.

Racherla, P. N. and Adams, P. J.: Sensitivity of global tropospheric ozone and fine particulate matter concentrations to climate change, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D24103, doi:10.1029/2005JD006939, 2007.

Räisänen, J.: Impact of increasing CO2 on monthly-to-annual precipitation extremes: analysis of the CMIP2 experiments, Clim. Dynam., 24, 309–323, 2005.

Schwartz, J., Dockery, D. W., and Neas, L. M.: Is daily mortality associated specifically with fine particles?, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 46, 927–939, 1996.

Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric chemistry and physics: From air pollution to climate change, Third edition, John Wiley, New York, 2006.

Sheehan, P. E. and Bowman, F. M.: Estimated effects of temperature on secondary organic aerosol concentrations, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 2129–2135, 2001.

Strader, R., Lurmann, F., and Pandis, S. N.: Evaluation of secondary organic aerosol formation in winter, Atmos. Environ., 33, 4849–4863, 1999.

Steiner, A. L., Tonse, S., Cohen, R. C., Goldstein, A. H., and Harley, R. A.: Influence of future climate and emissions on regional air quality in California, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D18303, doi:10.1029/2005JD006935, 2006.

Sweet, C. W. and Gatz, D. F.: Summary and analysis of available PM$_2.5$ measurements in Illinois, Atmos. Environ., 32, 1129–1133, 1998.

Triantafyllou, A. G., Kiros, E. S., and Evagelopoulos, V. G.: Respirable particulate matter at an urban and nearby industrial location: Concentrations and variability and synoptic weather conditions during high pollution episodes, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 52, 287–296, 2002.

Unger, N., Shindell, D. T., Koch, D. M., Amann, M., Cofala, J., and Streets, D. G.: Influences of man-made emissions and climate changes on tropospheric ozone, methane, and sulfate at 2030 from a broad range of possible futures, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D12313, doi:10.1029/2005JD006518, 2006.

Wilkinson, J. and Janssen, M.: BIOME3. Prepared for the National Emissions Inventory Workshop, Denver, CO, 1–3 May 2001, http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/conference/ei10/modeling/wilkinson.pdf, 2001.

Wise, E. K. and Comrie, A. C.: Meteorologically adjusted urban air quality trends in the Southwestern United States, Atmos. Environ., 39, 2969–2980, 2005.