Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics www.atmos-chem-phys.net 1680-7316 1680-7324 7 12 2007 10.5194/acp-7-3081-2007 http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/7/3081/2007/ http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/7/3081/2007/acp-7-3081-2007.html http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/7/3081/2007/acp-7-3081-2007.pdf 3081 3101 2007-06-15 Aerosol-cloud interaction inferred from MODIS satellite data and global aerosol models G. Myhre gunnar.myhre@geo.uio.no F. Stordal M. Johnsrud Y. J. Kaufman D. Rosenfeld T. Storelvmo J. E. Kristjansson T. K. Berntsen A. Myhre I. S. A. Isaksen Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, Norway Norwegian Institute for Air Research, 2027 Kjeller, Norway Center for International Climate and Environmental Research – Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt Maryland 20771, USA Institute of Earth Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel Telemark University College, Bø, Norway We have used the MODIS satellite data and two global aerosol models to investigate the relationships between aerosol optical depth (AOD) and cloud parameters that may be affected by the aerosol concentration. The relationships that are studied are mainly between AOD, on the one hand, and cloud cover, cloud liquid water path, and water vapour, on the other. Additionally, cloud droplet effective radius, cloud optical depth, cloud top pressure and aerosol Ångström exponent, have been analysed in a few cases. In the MODIS data we found, as in earlier studies, an enhancement in the cloud cover with increasing AOD. We find it likely that most of the strong increase in cloud cover with AOD, at least for AOD<0.2, is a result of aerosol-cloud interactions and a prolonged cloud lifetime. Large and mesoscale weather systems seem not to be a cause for the increase in cloud cover with AOD in this range. Sensitivity simulations show that when water uptake of the aerosols is not taken into account in the models the modelled cloud cover mostly decreases with AOD. Part of the relationship found in the MODIS data for AOD>0.2 can be explained by larger water uptake close to the clouds since relative humidity is higher in regions with higher cloud cover. The efficiency of the hygroscopic growth depends on aerosol type, the hygroscopic nature of the aerosol, the relative humidity, and to some extent the cloud screening. By analysing the Ångström exponent we find that the hygroscopic growth of the aerosol is not likely to be a main contributor to the cloud cover increase with AOD. Since the largest increase in cloud cover with AOD is for low AOD (~0.2) and thus also for low cloud cover, we argue that cloud contamination is not likely to play a large role. However, interpretation of the complex relationships between AOD and cloud parameters should be made with great care and further work is clearly needed. Ackerman, A. S., Toon, O. B., Stevens, D. E., Heymsfield, A. J., Ramanathan, V., et al.: Reduction of tropical cloudiness by soot, Science, 288(5468), 1042–1047, 2000. Albrecht, B. A.: Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, And Fractional Cloudiness, Science, 245(4923), 1227–1230, 1989. Anderson, T. L., Charlson, R. J., Schwartz, S. E., Knutti, R., Boucher, O., et al.: Climate forcing by aerosols – a hazy picture, Science, 300(5622), 1103–1104, 2003. Andreae, M. O., Rosenfeld, D., Artaxo, P., Costa, A. A., Frank, G. P., et al.: Smoking rain clouds over the Amazon, Science, 303(5662), 1337–1342, 2004. Berglen, T. F., Berntsen, T. K., Isaksen, I. S. A., and Sundet, J. K.: A global model of the coupled sulfur/oxidant chemistry in the troposphere: The sulfur cycle, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109(D19), D19310, doi:10.1029/2003JD003948, 2004. Boucher, O., Myhre, G., Myhre, A.: Direct human influence of irrigation on atmospheric water vapour and climate, Clim. Dynam., 22, 597–603, 2004. Breon, F. M., Tanre, D., and Generoso, S.: Aerosol effect on cloud droplet size monitored from satellite, Science, 295(5556), 834–838, 2002. Cook, J. and Highwood, E. J.: Climate response to tropospheric absorbing aerosols in an intermediate general-circulation model, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 130(596), 175–191, 2004. Dentener, F., Kinne, S., Bond, T., Boucher, O., Cofala, J., et al.: Emissions of primary aerosol and precursor gases in the year 2000 and 1750 prescribed data-sets for AeroCom, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4321–4344, 2006. Dusek, U., Frank, G. P., Hildebrandt, L., Curtius, J., Schneider, J., et al.: Size matters more than chemistry for cloud-nucleating ability of aerosol particles, Science, 312(5778), 1375–1378, 2006. Feingold, G., Eberhard, W. L., Veron, D. E., and Previdi, M.: First measurements of the Twomey indirect effect using ground-based remote sensors, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30(6), 1287, doi:10.1029/2002GL016633, 2003. Forest, C. E., Stone, P. H., Sokolov, A. P., Allen, M. R., and Webster, M. D.: Quantifying uncertainties in climate system properties with the use of recent climate observations, Science, 295(5552), 113–117, 2002. Gunn, R. and Phillips, B. B.: An Experimental Investigation Of The Effect Of Air Pollution On The Initiation Of Rain, J. Meteorol., 14(3), 272–280, 1957. Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J., Noguer, M., et al. (Eds.): Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge Univ. Press, UK/USA, 2001. Iversen, T. and Seland, O.: A scheme for process-tagged SO4 and BC aerosols in NCAR CCM3: Validation and sensitivity to cloud processes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107(D24), 4751, doi:10.1029/2001JD000885, 2002. Johnson, B. T., Shine, K. P., and Forster, P. M.: The semi-direct aerosol effect: Impact of absorbing aerosols on marine stratocumulus, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 130(599), 1407–1422, 2004. Karl, T. R. and Steurer, P. M.: Increased Cloudiness In The United-States During The 1st-Half Of The 20th-Century – Fact Or Fiction, Geophys. Res. Lett., 17(11), 1925–1928, 1990. Kaufman, Y. J., Boucher, O., Tanre, D., Chin, M., Remer, L. A., et al.: Aerosol anthropogenic component estimated from satellite data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32(17), L17804, doi:10.1029/2005GL023125, 2005b. Kaufman, Y. J. and Fraser, R. S.: The effect of smoke particles on clouds and climate forcing, Science, 277(5332), 1636–1639, 1997. Kaufman, Y. J., Koren, I., Remer, L. A., Rosenfeld, D., and Rudich, Y.: The effect of smoke, dust, and pollution aerosol on shallow cloud development over the Atlantic Ocean, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 102(32), 11 207–11 212, 2005a. Kaufman, Y. J., Remer, L. A., Tanre, D., Li, R. R., Kleidman, R., et al.: A critical examination of the residual cloud contamination and diurnal sampling effects on MODIS estimates of aerosol over ocean, IEEE Transact. Geosci. Rem. Sens., 43(12), 2886–2897, 2005c. Kaufman, Y. J., Tanre, D., and Boucher, O.: A satellite view of aerosols in the climate system, Nature, 419(6903), 215–223, 2002. Kaufman, Y. J., Tanre, D., Remer, L. A., Vermote, E. F., Chu, A., et al.: Operational remote sensing of tropospheric aerosol over land from EOS moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102(D14), 17 051–17 067, 1997. Khain, A., Rosenfeld, D., and Pokrovsky, A.: Aerosol impact on the dynamics and microphysics of deep convective clouds, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131(611), 2639–2663, 2005. Kim, B. G., Schwartz, S. E., Miller, M. A., and Min, Q. L.: Effective radius of cloud droplets by ground-based remote sensing: Relationship to aerosol, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108(D23), 4740, doi:10.1029/2003JD003721, 2003. Kirkevåg, A. and Iversen, T.: Global direct radiative forcing by process-parameterized aerosol optical properties, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107(D20), 4433, doi:10.1029/2001JD000886, 2002. Knutti, R., Stocker, T. F., Joos, F., and Plattner, G. K.: Constraints on radiative forcing and future climate change from observations and climate model ensembles, Nature, 416(6882), 719–723, 2002. Koren, I., Kaufman, Y. J., Remer, L. A., and Martins, J. V.: Measurement of the effect of Amazon smoke on inhibition of cloud formation, Science, 303(5662), 1342–1345, 2004. Koren, I., Kaufman, Y. J., Rosenfeld, D., Remer, L. A., and Rudich, Y.: Aerosol invigoration and restructuring of Atlantic convective clouds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32(14), L14828, doi:10.1029/2005GL023187, 2005. Lohmann, U. and Feichter, J.: Global indirect aerosol effects: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 715–737, 2005. Lohmann, U., Koren, I., and Kaufman, Y. J.: Disentangling the role of microphysical and dynamical effects in determining cloud properties over the Atlantic, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L09802, doi:10.1029/2005GL024625, 2006. Marshak, A., Platnick, S., Varnai, T., Wen, G., and Cahalan, R. F.: Impact of three-dimensional radiative effects on satellite retrievals of cloud droplet sizes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D09207, doi:10.1029/2005JD006686, 2006. Menon, S., Hansen, J., Nazarenko, L., and Luo, Y. F.: Climate effects of black carbon aerosols in China and India, Science, 297(5590), 2250–2253, 2002. Myhre, G., Stordal, F., Berglen, T. F., Sundet, J. K., and Isaksen, I. S. A.: Uncertainties in the radiative forcing due to sulfate aerosols, J. Atmos. Sci., 61(5), 485–498, 2004. Myhre, G., Bellouin, N., Berglen, T. F., Berntsen, T. K., Boucher, O., et al.: Comparison of the radiative properties and direct radiative effect of aerosols from a global aerosol model and remote sensing data over ocean, Tellus, 59B, 115–129, 2007. Norris, J. R.: On trends and possible artifacts in global ocean cloud cover between 1952 and 1995, J. Climate, 12(6), 1864–1870, 1999. Penner, J. E., Dong, X. Q., and Chen, Y.: Observational evidence of a change in radiative forcing due to the indirect aerosol effect, Nature, 427(6971), 231–234, 2004. Penner, J. E., Zhang, S. Y., and Chuang, C. C.: Soot and smoke aerosol may not warm climate, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108(D21), 4657, doi:10.1029/2003JD003409, 2003. Platnick, S., King, M. D., Ackerman, S. A., Menzel, W. P., Baum, B. A., et al.: The MODIS cloud products: Algorithms and examples from Terra, IEEE Transact. Geosci. Rem. Sens., 41(2), 459–473, 2003. Ramanathan, V., Crutzen, P. J., Kiehl, J. T., and Rosenfeld, D.: Atmosphere – Aerosols, climate, and the hydrological cycle, Science, 294(5549), 2119–2124, 2001. Remer, L. A., Kaufman, Y. J., Tanre, D., Mattoo, S., Chu, D. A., et al.: The MODIS aerosol algorithm, products, and validation, J. Atmos. Sci., 62(4), 947–973, 2005. Rosenfeld, D.: TRMM observed first direct evidence of smoke from forest fires inhibiting rainfall, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26(20), 3105–3108, 1999. Rosenfeld, D.: Suppression of rain and snow by urban and industrial air pollution, Science, 287(5459), 1793–1796, 2000. Rosenfeld, D., Kaufman, Y. J., and Koren, I.: Switching cloud cover and dynamical regimes from open to closed Benard cells in response to supression of precipitation by aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 2503–2511, 2006. Rosenfeld, D., Lahav, R., Khain, A., and Pinsky, M.: The role of sea spray in cleansing air pollution over ocean via cloud processes, Science, 297(5587), 1667–1670, 2002. Rosenfeld, D.: Aerosol-cloud interactions control of Earth radiation and latent heat release budgets, Space Sci. Rev., 125, 149–157, 2006. Rosenfeld, D. and Lensky, I. M.: Satellite-based insights into precipitation formation processes in continental and maritime convective clouds, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 79(11), 2457–2476, 1998. Schwartz, S. E., Harshvardhan, and Benkovitz, C. M.: Influence of anthropogenic aerosol on cloud optical depth and albedo shown by satellite measurements and chemical transport modeling, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 99(4), 1784–1789, 2002. Sekiguchi, M., Nakajima, T., Suzuki, K., Kawamoto, K., Higurashi, A., et al.: A study of the direct and indirect effects of aerosols using global satellite data sets of aerosol and cloud parameters, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108(D22), 4699, doi:10.1029/2002JD003359, 2003. Storelvmo, T., Kristjansson, J. E., Myhre, G., Johnsrud, M., Stordal, F.: Combined observational and modeling based study of the aerosol indirect effect, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3583–3601, 2006. Sun, B. M. and Groisman, P. Y.: Variations in low cloud cover over the United States during the second half of the twentieth century, J. Climate, 17(9), 1883–1888, 2004. Tanré, D., Kaufman, Y. J., Herman, M., and Mattoo, S.: Remote sensing of aerosol properties over oceans using the MODIS/EOS spectral radiances, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102(D14), 16 971–16 988, 1997. Textor, C., Schulz, M., Guibert, S., Kinne, S., Balkanski, Y., et al.: Analysis and quantification of the diversities of aerosol life cycles within AeroCom, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 1777–1813, 2006. Trenberth, K. E., Fasullo, J., and Smith, L.: Trends and variability in column-integrated atmospheric water vapor, Clim. Dynam., 24, 741–758, 2005. Tuomenvirta, H., Alexandersson, H., Drebs, A., Frich, P., and Nordli, P. O.: Trends in Nordic and Arctic temperature extremes and ranges, J. Climate, 13(5), 977–990, 2000. Twomey, S.: Influence Of Pollution On Shortwave Albedo Of Clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 34(7), 1149–1152, 1977. Williams, E., Rosenfeld, D., Madden, N., Gerlach, J., Gears, N., et al.: Contrasting convective regimes over the Amazon: Implications for cloud electrification, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107(D20), 8082, doi:10.1029/2001JD000380, 2002. Zhang, J. L., Reid, J. S., and Holben, B. N.: An analysis of potential cloud artifacts in MODIS over ocean aerosol optical thickness products, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32(15), L15803, doi:10.1029/2005GL023254, 2005.