References

ACP

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

ACP

1680-7324

Copernicus GmbH

Göttingen, Germany

10.5194/acp-7-2881-2007

Technical Note: The effect of sensor resolution on the number of cloud-free observations from space

Krijger

J. M.

¹ van Weele

² Aben

¹ Frey

SRON, Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Sorbonnelaan 2, 3584 CA Utrecht, The Netherlands

KNMI, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, De Bilt, The Netherlands

Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA

11 06 2007

7 11 2881 2891

This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/7/2881/2007/acp-7-2881-2007.html

The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/7/2881/2007/acp-7-2881-2007.pdf

Air quality and surface emission inversions are likely to be focal points for future satellite missions on atmospheric composition. Most important for these applications is sensitivity to the atmospheric composition in the lowest few kilometers of the troposphere. Reduced sensitivity by clouds needs to be minimized. In this study we have quantified the increase in number of useful footprints, i.e. footprints which are sufficient cloud-free, as a function of sensor resolution (footprint area). High resolution (1 km×1 km) MODIS TERRA cloud mask observations are aggregated to lower resolutions. Statistics for different thresholds on cloudiness are applied. For each month in 2004 four days of MODIS data are analyzed. Globally the fraction of cloud-free observations drops from 16% at 100 km2 resolution to only 3% at 10 000 km2 if not a single MODIS observation within a footprint is allowed to be cloudy. If up to 5% or 20% of a footprint is allowed to be cloudy, the fraction of cloud-free observations is 9% or 17%, respectively, at 10 000 km2 resolution. The probability of finding cloud-free observations for different sensor resolutions is also quantified as a function of geolocation and season, showing examples over Europe and northern South America (ITCZ).

References 1

Ackerman, S A., Strabala, K I., Menzel, W P., Frey, R A., Moeller, C C., Gumley, L E., Baum, B., Wetzel-Seeman, S., and Zhang, H.: Discriminating clear sky from clouds with MODIS Algorithm Theoritical Basis Document (MOD35), Tech. Rep. ATBD-MOD-06, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2002.

Asner, G.: Cloud cover in Landsat observations of the Brazilian Amazon, Int. J. Rem. Sens., 22, 3855–3862, 2001.

Berendes, T A., Berendes, A., Welch, R M., Dutton, E G., Uttal, T., and Clothiaux, E E.: Cloud Cover Comparisons of the MODIS Daytime Cloud Mask with Surface Instruments at the North Slope of Alaska ARM Site, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens., 42, 2584–2592, 2004.

Boersma, K F., Eskes, H J., and Brinksma, E J.: Error analysis for tropospheric NO2 retrieval from space, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D04 311–D04 322, 2004.

Bovensmann, H., Burrows, J P., Buchwitz, M., Frerick, J., Noel, S., Rozanov, V V., Chance, K V., and Goede, A. P H.: Sciamachy: Mission objectives and measurement modes, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 127–150, 1999.

Bréon, F M., O'Brien, D M., and Spinhirne, J D.: Scattering layer statistics from space borne GLAS observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, 22 802, doi:10.1029/2005GL023825, 2005.

Burrows, J P., Dehn, A., Deters, B., Himmelmann, S., Richter, A., Voigt, S., and Orphal, J.: Atmospheric remote-sensing reference data from GOME: 2, Temperature-dependent absorption cross sections of O3 in the 231–794 nm range, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Trans., 61, 509–517, 1999.

ESA: The five candidate earth explorer core missions, Reports for Assessment, ACECHEM, Tech. rep., ESA, 2001.

Gloudemans, A M S., Schrijver, H., Kleipool, Q., van den Broek, M M P., Straume, A G., Lichtenberg, G., van Hees, R M., Aben, I., and Meirink, J F.: The impact of SCIAMACHY near-infrared instrument calibration on CH4 and CO total columns, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1733–1770, 2005.

Harshvardhan, B. A., Wielicki, B A., and Ginger, K M.: The Interpretation of Remotely Sensed Cloud Properties from a Model Parameterization Perspective, J. Climate, 7, 1987–1998, 1994.

Hastenrath, S.: Annual cycle of upper air circulation and convective activity over the tropical Americas, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 4267–4274, 1997.

Heidinger, A K., Rao Anne, V., and Dean, C.: Using MODIS to Estimate Cloud Contamination of the AVHRR Data Record, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 19, 586–601, 2004.

Kelder, H., van Weele, M., Bovensmann, H., Goede, A., Kerridge, B., Mager, R., Monks, P., Reburn, W., Remedios, J., and Sassier, H.: Operational Atmospheric Chemistry Monitoring Missions: CAPACITY, final report, ESA contract no. 17237/03/NL/GS, Tech. rep., ESA, 2005.

Koelemeijer, R B A. and Stammes, P.: Effects of clouds on ozone column retrieval from GOME UV measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 8281–8294, 1999.

Leue, C., Wenig, M., Wagner, T., Klimm, O., Platt, U., and Jähne, B.: Quantitative analysis of NOx emissions from Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment satellite image sequences, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 5493–5506, 2001.

Levelt, P F., van den Oord, B., Hilsenrath, E., Leppelmeier, G W., Bhartia, P K., Malkki, A., Kelder, H., van der A, R J., Brinksma, E J., van Oss, R., Veefkind, P., van Weele, M., and Noordhoek, R.: Science Objectives of EOS-Aura's Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI), in: Proc. Quad. Ozone Symposium, pp. 127–128, 2000.

Li, Z., Crib, M., Chang, F.-L., Trishchenko, A., and Luo, Y.: Evaluating MODIS Cloud Detection Algorithm Using Whole-Sky Imager Cloud Cover Data at the Three ARM Sites, in: Fifteenth ARM Science Team Meeting Proceedings, Daytona Beach, Florida, 2005.

Martin, R V., Parrish, D D., Ryerson, T B., Nicks, D K., Chance, K., Kurosu, T P., Jacob, D J., Sturges, E D., Fried, A., and Wert, B P.: Evaluation of GOME satellite measurements of tropospheric NO2 and HCHO using regional data from aircraft campaigns in the southeastern United States, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D24307, doi:10.1029/2004JD004869, 2004.

Massons, J., Domingo, D., and Lorente, J.: Seasonal cycle of cloud cover analyzed using Meteosat images, Ann. Geophys., 16, 331–341, 1998.

Meerk\" otter, R., K\" onig, C., Bissolli, P., Gesell, G., and Mannstein, H., A 14-year European Cloud Climatology from NOAA/AVHRR data in comparison to surface observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, 15 103, doi:10.1029/2004GL020098, 2004.

Meirink, J F., Eskes, H J., and Goede, A. P H.: Sensitivity analysis of methane emissions derived from SCIAMACHY observations through inverse modelling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 9405–9445, 2005.

Richter, A. and Burrows, J P.: Tropospheric NO2 from GOME measurements, Adv, Space Res., 29, 1673–1683, 2002.

Richter, A., Burrows, J P., Nusz, H., Granier, C., and Niemeier, U.: Increase in tropospheric nitrogen dioxide over China observed from space, Nature, 437, 129–132, 2005.

Thomas, S M., Heidinger, A K., and Pavolonis, M J., Comparison of NOAA's Operational AVHRR-Derived Cloud Amount to Other Satellite-Derived Cloud Climatologies., J. Climate, 17, 4805–4822, 2004.

Tjemkes, S., Lutz, H., Duff, C., Stuhlmann, R., and McNally, A.: Detection of cloud-free areas as a function of Sensor Resolution and Time Sampling, Technical Memorandum No. 10, 2003.

Wielicki, B A. and Parker, L.: On the determination of cloud cover from satellite sensors: The effect of sensor spatial resolution, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 12 799–12 823, 1992.