<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/inc/acp/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7316</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7324</eissn>
		<volume_number>7</volume_number>
		<issue_number>6</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2007</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acp-7-1575-2007</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/7/1575/2007/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/7/1575/2007/acp-7-1575-2007.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/7/1575/2007/acp-7-1575-2007.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>1575</start_page>
	<end_page>1583</end_page>
	<publication_date>2007-03-23</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Improved ozone profile retrievals from GOME data with degradation  correction in reflectance</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>X. Liu</name>
			<email>xliu@cfa.harvard.edu</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>K. Chance</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>T. P. Kurosu</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Atomic and Molecular Physics Division, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for  Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA, USA</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">We present a simple method to perform degradation
correction to Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME) reflectance spectra
by comparing the average reflectance for 60&amp;deg; N&amp;ndash;60&amp;deg; S with that at
the beginning of GOME observations (July&amp;ndash;December 1995) after removing the dependences on solar
zenith angle and seasonal variation. The results indicate positive
biases of up to ~15&amp;ndash;25% in the wavelength range 289&amp;ndash;370 nm
during 2000&amp;ndash;2002; the degradation also exhibits significant dependence on
wavelength and viewing zenith angle. These results are consistent with previous
studies using radiative transfer models and ozone observations. The degradation causes retrieval biases of up to ~3%
(10 DU, 1 DU=2.69&amp;times;10&lt;sup&gt;16&lt;/sup&gt; molecules cm&lt;sup&gt;&amp;minus;2&lt;/sup&gt;), 30% (10 DU),
10%, and 40% in total column ozone, tropospheric column ozone,
stratospheric ozone and tropospheric ozone, respectively, from our GOME
ozone profile retrieval algorithm. In addition, retrieval biases due to degradation vary
significantly with latitude. The application of this degradation
correction improves the retrievals relative to Dobson and
ozonesonde measurements at Hohenpeißenberg station during 2000&amp;ndash;2003 and improves the
spatiotemporal consistency of retrieval quality during 1996&amp;ndash;2003. However,
because this method assumes that the deseasonalized globally-averaged reflectance
does not change much with time, retrievals with this correction may be inadequate
for trend analysis. In addition, it does not correct for instrument biases that have occurred since launch.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Chance, K. V., Burrows, J. P., Perner, D., and Schneider, W.: Satellite measurements of atmospheric ozone profiles, including tropospheric ozone, from ultraviolet/visible measurements in the nadir geometry: A potential method to retrieve tropospheric ozone, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 57(4), 467&amp;ndash;476, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Connor, B.J., Parrish, A., and Tsou, J.-J.: Detection of stratospheric ozone trends by ground-based microwave observations, Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng., 1491, 218-230, 1991. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> ESA: The GOME users manual, European Space Agency (ESA) Publication SP-1182, ESA Publications Division, ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Gupta, S. K., Stackhouse, P. W., Mikovitz, J. C., Cox, S. J. and Zhang, T.: Surface radiation budget over tropical pacific: Interannual variability, 12th Conference on Atmospheric Radiation, Madison, WI, USA, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Hasekamp, O. P. and Landgraf, J.: Ozone profile retrieval from backscattered ultraviolet radiances: The inverse problem solved by regularization, J. Geophys. Res., 106(D8), 8077&amp;ndash;8088, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Hoogen, R., Rozanov, V. V., and Burrows, J. P.: Ozone profiles from GOME satellite data: Algorithm description and first validation, J. Geophys. Res., 104(D7), 8263&amp;ndash;8280, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Krijger, J. M., Aben, I., and Landgraf, J.: CHEOPS-GOME: WP2.1: Study of instrument degradation, ESA SRON-EOS/RP/05-018 Tech. rep., 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Liu, X., Chance, K., Sioris, C. E., Spurr, R. J. D., Kurosu, T. P., Martin, R. V., and Newchurch, M. J.: Ozone profile and tropospheric ozone retrievals from Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment: Algorithm description and validation, J. Geophys. Res., 110(D20), D20307, doi:10.1029/2005JD006240, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Liu, X., Chance, K., Sioris, C. E., Kurosu, T. P., and Newchurch, M. J.: Intercomparison of GOME, ozonesonde, and SAGE-II measurements of ozone: Demonstration of the need to homogenize available ozonesonde datasets, J. Geophys. Res., J. Geophys. Res., 101 (D14), D114305, doi:10.1029/2005JD006718, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Meijer, Y. J., Swart, D. P. J., Baier, F., et al.: Evaluation of Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME) ozone profiles from nine different algorithms, J. Geophys. Res., 111 (D21), D21306, doi:10.1029/2005JD006778, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Mishchenko, M. I., Lacis, A. A. and Travis, L. D.: Errors induced by the neglect of polarization in radiance calculations for Rayleigh scattering atmospheres, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 51, 491-510, 1994. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Müller, M. D., Kaifel, A. K., Weber, M., Tellmann, S., Burrows, J. P., and Loyola, D.: Ozone profile retrieval from Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME) data using a neural network approach (neural network ozone retrieval system (NNORSY)), J. Geophys. Res., 108(D16), 4497, doi:10.1029/2002JD002784, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Munro, R., Siddans, R., Reburn, W. J., and Kerridge, B.: Direct measurement of tropospheric ozone from space, Nature, 392, 168&amp;ndash;171, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Schutgens, N. A. J. and Stammes, P.: A novel approach to the polarization correction of spaceborne spectroscopy, J. Geophys. Res., 108 (D7), 4229, doi:10.1029/2002JD002736, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Snel, R.: In-orbit optical path degradation: GOME experience and SCIAMACHY prediction, ERS Envisat Symposium, SP-461, Göteborg, Sweden, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Tanzi, C. P., Snel, R., Hasekamp, O., and Aben, I.: Degradation of UV earth albedo observations by GOME, ERS-ENVISAT Symposium, SP-461,Göteborg, Sweden, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> van der A, R. J., van Oss, R. F., Piters, A. J. M., Fortuin, J. P. F., Meijer, Y. J., and Kelder, H. M.: Ozone profile retrieval from recalibrated GOME data, J. Geophys. Res., 107(D15), 4239, doi:10.1029/2001JD000696, 2002. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

