References

ACP

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

ACP

1680-7324

Copernicus GmbH

Göttingen, Germany

10.5194/acp-6-4163-2006

Impact of cloud-borne aerosol representation on aerosol direct and indirect effects

Ghan

S. J.

¹ Easter

R. C.

Atmospheric Science and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA

21 09 2006

6 12 4163 4174

This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/6/4163/2006/acp-6-4163-2006.html

The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/6/4163/2006/acp-6-4163-2006.pdf

Aerosol particles attached to cloud droplets are much more likely to be removed from the atmosphere and are much less efficient at scattering sunlight than if unattached. Models used to estimate direct and indirect effects of aerosols employ a variety of representations of such cloud-borne particles. Here we use a global aerosol model with a relatively complete treatment of cloud-borne particles to estimate the sensitivity of simulated aerosol, cloud and radiation fields to various approximations to the representation of cloud-borne particles. We find that neglecting transport of cloud-borne particles introduces little error, but that diagnosing cloud-borne particles produces global mean biases of 20% and local errors of up to 40% for aerosol, droplet number, and direct and indirect radiative forcing. Aerosol number, aerosol optical depth and droplet number are significantly underestimated in regions and seasons where and when wet removal is primarily by stratiform rather than convective clouds (polar regions during winter), but direct and indirect effects are less biased because of the limited sunlight there and then. A treatment that predicts the total mass concentration of cloud-borne particles for each mode yields smaller errors and runs 20% faster than the complete treatment. The errors are much smaller than current estimates of uncertainty in direct and indirect effects of aerosols, which suggests that the treatment of cloud-borne aerosol is not a significant source of uncertainty in estimates of direct and indirect effects.

References 1

Abdul-Razzak, H. and Ghan, S. J.: A parameterization of aerosol activation. Part 2: Multiple aerosol types, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 6837–6844, 2000.

Adams, P. J. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Predicting global aerosol size distributions in general circulation models, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4370, doi:10.1029/2001JD001010, 2002.

Barth, M., Rasch, P. J., Kiehl, J. T., Benkovitz, C. M., and Schwartz, S. E.: Sulfur chemistry in the NCAR CCM: Description, evaluation, features and sensitivity to aqueous chemistry, J. Geophys. Res, 105, 1387–1415, 2000.

Barth, M. C., Stuart, A. L., and Skamarock, W. C.: Numerical simulations of the July 10, 1996, Stratospheric-Tropospheric Experiment: Radiation, Aerosols, and Ozone (STERAO) Deep Convection experiment storm – Redistribution of soluble tracers, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 12 381–12 400, 2001.

Chaumerliac, N., Richard, E., Pinty, J. P., and Nickerson, E. C.: Sulfur scavenging in a mesoscale model with quasi-spectral microphysics: Two-dimensional results for continental and maritime clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 3114–3126, 1987.

Chin, M., Rood, R. B., Lin, S.-J., Muller, J.-F., and Thompson, A. M.: Atmospheric sulfur cycle in the global model GOCART: Model description and global properties, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 24 661–24 687, 2000.

Chin, M., Ginoux, P., Kinne, S., Torres, O., Holben, B. N., Duncan, B. N., Martin, R. V., Logan, J. A., Higurashi, A., and Nakajima, T.: Tropospheric aerosol optical thickness from the GOCART model and comparisons with satellite and sunphotometer measurements, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 461–483, 2002.

Easter R. C. and Luecken D. J.: A simulation of sulfur wet deposition and its dependence on the inflow of sulfur species to storms, Atmos. Environ., 22, 2715–2739, 1988.

Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., Zhang, Y., Saylor, R. D., Chapman, E. G., Laulainen, N. S., Abdul-Razzak, H., Leung, L. R., Bian, X., and Zaveri, R. A.: MIRAGE: Model description and evaluation of aerosols and trace gases, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D20210, doi:10.1029/2004JD004571, 2004.

Flossmann, A. I., Hall, W. D., and Pruppacher, H. R.: A theoretical study of the wet removal of atmospheric pollutants. Part I: The redistribution of aerosol particles captured through nucleation and impaction scavenging by growing cloud drops, J. Atmos. Sci., 42, 583–606, 1985.

Flossmann, A. I. and Pruppacher, H. R.: A theoretical study of the wet removal of atmospheric pollutants. Part III: The uptake, redistribution, and deposition of (NH$_4)_2$SO<sub>4</sub> particles by a convective cloud using a two-dimensional cloud dynamics model, J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 1857–1871, 1988.

Ghan, S. J., Leung, L. R., Easter, R. C., and Abdul-Razzak, H.: Prediction of droplet number in a general circulation model, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 21 777–21 794, 1997.

Ghan, S., Laulainen, N., Easter, R., Wagener, R., Nemesure, S., Chapman, E., Zhang, Y., and Leung, R.,: Evaluation of aerosol direct radiative forcing in MIRAGE, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 5295–5316, 2001a.

Ghan, S. J., Easter, R. C., Chapman, E., Abdul-Razzak, H., Zhang, Y., Leung, R., Laulainen, N., Saylor, R., and Zaveri, R.: A physically-based estimate of radiative forcing by anthropogenic sulfate aerosol, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 5279–5294, 2001b.

Ginoux, P., Chin, M., Tegen, I., Prospero, J., Holben, B., Dubovik, O., and Lin, S.-J.: Sources and global distributions of dust aerosols simulated with the GOCART model, J Geophys. Res., 106, 20 255–20 273, 2001.

Gong, S. L., Barrie, L. B., and Lazare, M.: Canadian Aerosol Module: A size-segregated simulation of atmospheric aerosol processes for climate and air quality models, 2, Global sea-salt aerosol and its budgets, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4779, doi:10.1029/2001JD002004, 2002.

Gong, S. L., Barrie, L. A., Blanchet, J.-P., von Salzen, K., Lohmann, U., Lesins, G., Spacek, L., Zhang, L. M., Girard, E., Lin, H., Leaitch, R., Leighton, H., Chylek, P., and Huang, P.: Canadian Aerosol Module: A size-segregated simulation of atmospheric aerosol processes for climate and air quality models: 1. Module developments, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4007, doi:10.1029/2001JD002002, 2003.

Hales, J. M.: A generalized multidimensional model for precipitation scavenging and atmospheric chemistry, Atmos. Environ., 23, 2017–2031, 1989.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Climatic Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, edited by: Houghton, T. J., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J., and Noguer, M., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K., 2001.

Iversen, T. and Seland, O.: A scheme for process-tagged SO4 and BC aerosols in NCAR-CCM3 validation and sensitivity to cloud processes, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4751, doi:10.1029/2001JD000885, 2002.

Jones, A., Roberts, D. L., Woodage, M. J., and Johnson, C. E.: Indirect sulphate aerosol forcing in a climate model with an interactive sulphur cycle, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 20 293–20 310, 2001.

Kiehl, J. T. and Gent, P. R.: The Community Climate System Model, Version Two, J. Clim., 17, 3666–3682, 2004.

Kiehl, J. T., Schneider, T. L., Rasch, P. J., Barth, M. C., and Wong, J.: Radiative forcing due to sulfate aerosols from simulations with the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model, Version 3., J. Geophys. Res., 105, 1441–1457, 2000.

Kinne, S., Schulz, M., Textor, C., Guibert, S., Balkanski, Y., Bauer,~ S., Berntsen, T., Berglen, T., Boucher, O., Chin, M., Collins, W., Dentener, F., Diehl, T., Easter, R., Feichter, H., Fillmore, D., Ghan, S., Ginoux, P., Gong, S., Grini , A., Hendricks, J., Herzog, M., Horrowitz, L., Isaksen, I., Iversen, T., Jones, A., Kloster, S., Koch, D., Krool, M., Lauer, A., Lamarque, J.F., Lesins, G., Liu, X., Lohmann, U., Montanaro, V., Myhre, G., Penner, J., Pitari, G., Reddy, S., Roberts, D., Seland, O., Stier, P., Takemura, T., and Tie, X.: An AeroCom initial assessment – optical properties in aerosol component modules of global models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 1815–1834, 2006.

Koch, D.: Transport and direct radiative forcing of carbonaceous and sulfate aerosols in the GISS GCM, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 20 311–20 332, 2001.

Koch, D., Schmidt, G. A., and Field, C.: Sulfur, sea salt and radionuclide aerosols in GISS ModelE, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D06206, doi:10.1029/2004/JD005550, 2006.

Kreidenweis, S. M., Zhang, Y., and Taylor, G. R.: The effects of clouds and aerosol and chemical species production and distribution. 2. Chemistry model description and sensitivity analysis, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 23 867–23 882, 1997.

Lauer, A., Hendricks, J., Ackermann, I., Schell, B., Hass, H., and Metzger, S.: Simulating aerosol microphysics with the ECHAM/MADE GCM–Part I: Model description and comparison with observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 3251–3276, 2005.

Lin, S.-J. and Rood, R. B.: Multidimensional flux form semi-lagrangian transport schemes, Mon. Wea. Rev., 124, 2046–2070, 1996.

Lin, S.-J. and Rood, R. B.: An explicit flux-form semi-lagrangian shallow water model on the sphere, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 123, 2531–2533, 1997.

Liu, X., Penner, J. E., and Herzog, M.: Global modeling of aerosol dynamics: Model description, evaluation and interactions between sulfate and non-sulfate aerosols, J. Geophy. Res., 110, D18206, doi:10.1029/2004JD005674, 2005.

Liu, Y., Daum, P. H., and McGraw, R. L.: Size truncation effect, threshold behavior, and a new type of autoconversion parameterization, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L11811, doi:10.1029/2005GL022636, 2005.

Mahowald, N. M., Lamarque, J.-F., Tie, X. X., and Wolff, E.: Sea-salt aerosol response to climate change: Last Glacial Maximum, preindustrial, and doubled carbon dioxide climates, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D05303, doi:10.1029/2005JD006459, 2006a.

Mahowald, N. M., Muhs, D. R., Levis, S., Rasch, P. J., Yoshioka, M., Zender, C. S., and Luo, C.: Change in atmospheric mineral aerosols in response to climate: Last glacial period, preindustrial, modern, and doubled carbon dioxide climates, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D10202, doi:10.1029/2005JD006653, 2006b.

Ovtchinnikov, M. and Ghan, S. J.: Parallel simulations of aerosol influence on clouds using a cloud-resolving model and a single column model, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D15S10, doi:10.1029/2004JD005088, 2005.

Rasch, P. J. and Kristjansson, J. E.: A comparison of the ccm3 model climate using diagnosed and predicted condensate parameterizations, J. Clim., 11, 1587–1614, 1998.

Reddy, M. S., Boucher, O., Bellouin, N., Schulz, M., Balkanski, Y., Dufresne, J.-L., and Pham, M.: Estimates of global multicomponent aerosol optical depth and direct radiative perturbation in the Laboratoire de Me'te'orologie Dynamique general circulation model, J Geophys. Res., 110, D10S16, doi:10.1029/2004JD004757, 2005.

Rutledge, S. A., Hegg, D. A., and Hobbs, P. V.: A numerical-model for sulfur and nitrogen scavenging in narrow cold-frontal rainbands. 1. Model description and discussion of microphysical fields, J. Geophys. Res., 91, 14 385–14 402, 1986.

Spracklen, D. V., Pringle, K. J., Carslaw, K. S., Chipperfield, M. P., and Mann, G. W.: A global off-line model of size-resolved aerosol microphysics: I. Model development and prediction of aerosol properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2227–2252, 2005.

Stier, P., Feichter, J., Kinne, S., Kloster, S., Vignati, E., Wilson, J., Ganzeveld, L., Tegen, I., Werner, M., Balkanski, Y., Schulz, M., Boucher, O., Minikin, A., and Petzold, A.: The aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1125–1156, 2005.

Storelvmo, T., Kristjansson, J. E., Ghan, S. J., Kirkevåg, A., and Seland, Ø.: Predicting cloud droplet number concentration in CAM-Oslo, J. Geophys. Res., in press, 2006.

Takemura, T., Nakajima, T., Dubovik, O., Holben, B. N., and Kinne, S.: Single scattering albedo and radiative forcing of various aerosol species with a global three-dimensional model, J. Clim., 15, 333–352, 2002.

Textor, C. , Schulz, M., Guibert, S., Kinne, S., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S., Berntsen, T., Berglen, T., Boucher, O., Chin, M., Dentener, F., Diehl, T., Easter, R., Feichter, H. Fillmore, D., Ghan, S., Ginoux, P., Gong, S., Grini, A., Hendricks, J., Horrowitz, L., Isaksen, I., Iversen, T., Kloster, S., Koch, D., Kirkevåg, A., Kristjansson, J. E., Krol, M., Lauer, A., Lamarque, J.F., Liu, X., Montanaro, V., Myhre, G., Penner, J., Pitari, G., Reddy, S., Seland, Ø., Stier, P., Takemura, T., and Tie, X.: Analysis and quantification of the diversities of aerosol life cycles within AeroCom, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 1777–1813, 2006.

Tie, X., Brasseur, G., Emmons, L., Horowitz, L., and Kinnison, D.: Effects of aerosols on tropospheric oxidants: A global model study, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 2931–2964, 2001.

Tie, X., Madronich, S., Walters, S., Edwards, D. P., Ginoux, P, Mahowald, N., Zhang, R. Y., Lou, C., and Brasseur, G.: Assessment of the global impact of aerosols on tropospheric oxidants, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D03204, doi:10.1029/2004JD005359, 2005.

Tremblay, A. and Leighton, H.: A 3-dimensional cloud chemistry model, J. Appl. Met., 25, 652–671, 1986.

Zhang, L., Gong, S.-L., Padro, J., and Barrie, L.: A size-segregated particle dry deposition scheme for an atmospheric aerosol module, Atmos. Environ., 35, 549–560, 2001.