<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/inc/acp/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7316</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7324</eissn>
		<volume_number>6</volume_number>
		<issue_number>10</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2006</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acp-6-3085-2006</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/6/3085/2006/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/6/3085/2006/acp-6-3085-2006.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/6/3085/2006/acp-6-3085-2006.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>3085</start_page>
	<end_page>3098</end_page>
	<publication_date>2006-07-24</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Inverse modelling for mercury over Europe</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>Y. Roustan</name>
			<email>roustan@cerea.enpc.fr</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>M. Bocquet</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Centre d&apos;Enseignement et de Recherche en Environnement AtmosphÃ©rique, Joint laboratory Ã‰cole Nationale des Ponts et ChaussÃ©es/EDF R&amp;D, avenue Blaise Pascal, 77 455 Champs sur Marne, France</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">The fate and transport of mercury over Europe is studied using a regional Eulerian
transport model. Because gaseous elemental mercury is a long-lived species in the atmosphere,
boundary conditions must be properly taken into account. Ground measurements of gaseous mercury are very sensitive
to the uncertainties attached to those forcing conditions.
Inverse modelling can help to constrain the forcing fields and help
to improve the predicted mercury concentrations.
More generally, it allows to reduce the weaknesses of a regional model against
a global or hemispherical model for such diffuse trace constituent.
Adjoint techniques are employed to relate rigorously and explicitly the
measurements to the forcing fields. This way, the inverse problem is clearly
defined. Using EMEP measurements of gaseous mercury and performing the
inversions, it is shown that boundary conditions can be improved
significantly as well as the forecast concentrations. Using inverse modelling
to improve the emission inventory is however much more difficult. Indeed, there
are currently not enough mercury monitoring stations, and they are located
far away from the center of Europe.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Ariya,~P A., Dastoor,~A P., Amyot,~M., Schroeder,~W H., Barrie,~L., Anlauf,~K., Raofie,~F., Ryzhkov,~A., Davignon,~D., Lalonde,~J., and Steffen,~A.: The Arctic: a sink for mercury, Tellus, 56B, 397&amp;ndash;403, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Aspmo,~K., Gauchard,~P. A., Steffen,~A., Temme,~C., Berg,~T., Bahlmann,~E., Banic,~C., Dommergue,~A., Ebinghaus,~R., Ferrari,~C., Pirrone,~N., Sprovieri,~F., and Wibetoe,~G.: Measurements of atmospheric mercury species during an international study of mercury depletion events at Ny-\AAlesund, Svalbard, spring 2003. How reproducible are our present methods?, Atmos. Environ., 39, 7607&amp;ndash;7619, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Baer,~M. and Nester,~K.: Parameterization of trace gas dry deposition velocities for a regional mesoscale diffusion model, Ann. Geophys., 10, 912&amp;ndash;923, 1992. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Boutahar,~J., Lacour,~S., Mallet,~V., Qu\&apos;elo,~D., Roustan,~Y., and Sportisse,~B.: Development and validation of a fully modular platform for numerical modelling of air pollution: POLAIR, Int. J. Environ. Pollut., 22(1/2), 17&amp;ndash;28, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Brook,~J R., Zhang,~L., Di-Giovanni,~F., and Padro,~J.: Description and evaluation of a model of deposition velocities for routine estimates of air pollutant dry deposition over North America. Part I: model development, Atmos. Environ., 33, 5037&amp;ndash;5051, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Bullock,~O R. and Brehme,~K A.: Atmospheric mercury simulation using the CMAQ model: formulation description and analysis of wet deposition results, Atmos. Environ., 36, 2135&amp;ndash;2146, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Calvert,~J G. and Lindberg,~S E.: A modeling study of the mechanism of the halogen-ozone-mercury homogeneous reactions in the troposphere during the polar spring, Atmos. Environ., 37, 4467&amp;ndash;4481, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Christensen,~J H., Brandt,~J., Frohn,~L M., and Skov, H.: Modelling of mercury with the Danish Eulerian Hemispheric Model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 2251&amp;ndash;2257, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Ebinghaus,~R., Jennings,~S. G., Schroeder,~W. H., Berg,~T., Donaghy,~T., Guentzel,~J., Kenny,~C. Kock,~H. H., Kvietkus,~K., Landing,~W., Mühleck,~T. Munthe,~J., Prestbo,~E. M., Schneeberger,~D., Slemr,~F., Sommar,~J., Urba,~A., WallschlÃ¤ger,~D., and Xiao,~Z.: International field intercomparison measurements of atmospheric mercury species at Mace Head, Ireland, Atmos. Environ., 33, 3063&amp;ndash;3073, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Hicks,~B B. and Liss,~P S.: Transfer of $\chemSO_2$ and other reactive gases across the air-sea interface, Tellus, 28, 348&amp;ndash;354, 1976. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Ilyin,~I., Ryaboshapko A., and Travnikov,~O.: Heavy metal contamination on European and Hemisperical scale, EMEP Status report 3/2002, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Ilyin,~I., Travnikov,~O., Aas,~W., and Uggerud, H T.: Heavy metals: transboundary pollution of the environment, EMEP Status report 2/2003, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Landis,~M S., Stevens,~R K., Schaedlich,~F., and Prestbo,~E M.: Development and characterization of annular denuder methodology for the measurement of divalent inorganic reactive gaseous mercury in ambient air, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 3000&amp;ndash;3009, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Lin,~X. and Tao,~Y.: A numerical modelling study on regional mercury budget for eastern North America, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 535&amp;ndash;548, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Lindqvist,~O. and Rodhe,~H.: Atmospheric mercury &amp;ndash; a review, Tellus, 37B, 136&amp;ndash;159, 1985. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Pai,~P., Karamchandani,~P., and Seigneur,~C.: Sensitivity of simulated atmospheric mercury concentrations and depositions to model input parameters, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 13 855&amp;ndash;13 868, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Petersen,~G, Iverfeldt,~A., and Munthe,~J.: Atmospheric mercury species over central and northern Europe. Model calculations and comparison with observations from the nordic air and precipitation network for 1987 and 1988, Atmos. Environ., 29, 47&amp;ndash;67, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Roustan,~Y., Bocquet,~M., Musson Genon,~L., and Sportisse,~B.: Modeling atmospheric mercury at European scale with the Chemistry Transport Model \mbox\sc Polair3D, Proceedings of Gloream 2004, available at: http://www2.dmu.dk/atmosphericenvironment/gloream/2gloreameurasapproceedings.pdf, 2005.  </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Roustan, Y. and Bocquet, M.: Sensitivity analysis for mercury over Europe, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D14304, doi:10.1029/2005JD006616, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Roustan,~Y.: Mod\&apos;elisation de la dispersion atmosphérique du mercure, du plomb et du cadmium \`a l&apos;\&apos;echelle europ\&apos;eenne. PhD Thesis, \&apos;Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chauss\&apos;ees, Paris, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Ryaboshapko,~A., Ilyin,~I., Gusev,~A., and Afinogenova,~O.: Mercury in the atmosphere of Europe: concentrations, deposition patterns, transboundary fluxes, EMEP/MSC-E Report 7/1998, 1998.  </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Ryaboshapko,~A., Bullock,~R., Ebinghaus,~R., Ilyin,~I., Lohman,~K., Munthe,~J., Petersen,~G., Seigneur,~C., and WÃ¤ngberg,~I.: Comparison of mercury chemistry models, Atmos. Environ., 36, 3881&amp;ndash;3898, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> Ryaboshapko,~A., Artz,~R., Bullock,~R., Christensen,~J., Cohen,~M., Dastoor,~A., Davignon,~D., Draxler,~R., Ebinghaus,~R., Ilyin,~I., Munthe,~J., Petersen,~G., and Syrakov,~D.: Intercomparison study of numerical models for long-range atmospheric transport of mercury. Stage II. Comparison of modeling results with observations obtained during short-term measuring campaigns, MSC-E Technical Report 1/2003, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> Sartelet,~K., Boutahar,~J., Qu\&apos;elo,~D., Coll,~I., Plion,~P., and Sportisse,~B: Development and Validation of a 3D Chemistry-Transport Model, POLAIR3D, by Comparison with Data from ESQUIF Campaign, Proceedings of the 6th Gloream workshop: Global and regional atmospheric modeling, 140&amp;ndash;146, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text"> Seigneur,~C., Karamchandani,~P., Lohman,~K., Vijayaraghavan,~K., and Shia,~R. L.: Multiscale modeling of the atmospheric fate and transport of mercury, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 27 795&amp;ndash;27 809, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="26" content_type="text"> Seigneur,~C., Karamchandani,~P., Vijayaraghavan,~K., Lohman,~K., Shia,~R., and Levin,~L.: On the effect of spatial resolution on atmospheric mercury modeling, The Science of the Total Environment, 304, 73&amp;ndash;81, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="27" content_type="text"> Spee,~E.: Numerical methods in global transport models, PhD Thesis, Univ. Amsterdam, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="28" content_type="text"> Sportisse,~B., Boutahar,~J., Debry,~E., Qu\&apos;elo,~D., and Sartelet,~K.: Some tracks in Air Pollution Modeling. POLAIR: a numerical platform for air pollution modeling, RACSAM Journal of the Spanish Science Academy, Real Academia de Ciencias de Espana, 96, 507&amp;ndash;528, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="29" content_type="text"> Travnikov,~O. and Ryaboshapko,~A.: Modelling of mercury hemispheric transport and depositions, MSC-E Tech. Report 6/2002, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="30" content_type="text"> Wesely,~M L. and Hicks,~B B.: A review of the current status of knowledge on dry deposition, Atmos. Environ., 34, 2261&amp;ndash;2281, 2000. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

