References

ACP

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

ACP

1680-7324

Copernicus GmbH

Göttingen, Germany

10.5194/acp-6-2895-2006

Meteorological implementation issues in chemistry and transport models

Strahan

S. E.

¹ Polansky

B. C.

University of Maryland Baltimore County, Goddard Earth Science and Technology Center, 5523 Research Park Dr., Suite 320, Baltimore, MD, 21228, USA

Science Systems and Applications, Inc., 10210 Greenbelt Rd., Suite 600, Lanham, MD, 20706, USA

12 07 2006

6 10 2895 2910

This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/6/2895/2006/acp-6-2895-2006.html

The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/6/2895/2006/acp-6-2895-2006.pdf

Offline chemistry and transport models (CTMs) are versatile tools for studying composition and climate issues requiring multi-decadal simulations. They are computationally fast compared to coupled chemistry climate models, making them well-suited for integrating sensitivity experiments necessary for understanding model performance and interpreting results. The archived meteorological fields used by CTMs can be implemented with lower horizontal or vertical resolution than the original meteorological fields in order to shorten integration time, but the effects of these shortcuts on transport processes must be understood if the CTM is to have credibility. In this paper we present a series of sensitivity experiments on a CTM using the Lin and Rood advection scheme, each differing from another by a single feature of the wind field implementation. Transport effects arising from changes in resolution and model lid height are evaluated using process-oriented diagnostics that intercompare CH4, O3, and age tracer carried in the simulations. Some of the diagnostics used are derived from observations and are shown as a reality check for the model. Processes evaluated include tropical ascent, tropical-midlatitude exchange, poleward circulation in the upper stratosphere, and the development of the Antarctic vortex. We find that faithful representation of stratospheric transport in this CTM is possible with a full mesosphere, ~1 km resolution in the lower stratosphere, and relatively low vertical resolution (>4 km spacing) in the middle stratosphere and above, but lowering the lid from the upper to lower mesosphere leads to less realistic constituent distributions in the upper stratosphere. Ultimately, this affects the polar lower stratosphere, but the effects are greater for the Antarctic than the Arctic. The fidelity of lower stratospheric transport requires realistic tropical and high latitude mixing barriers which are produced at 2°×2.5°, but not lower resolution. At 2°×2.5° resolution, the CTM produces a vortex capable of isolating perturbed chemistry (e.g. high Cly and low NOy) required for simulating polar ozone loss.

References 1

Austin, J.: A three-dimensional coupled chemistry-climate model simulation of past stratospheric trends, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 218–232, 2002.

Austin, J. and Butchart, N.: Coupled chemistry-climate model simulations for the period 1980 to 2020: Ozone depletion and the start of ozone recovery, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 129, 3225–3249, 2003.

Bregman, A., Krol, M. C., Teyssedre, H., Norton, W. A., Iwi, A., Chipperfield, M., Pitari, G., Sundet, J. K., and Lelieveld, J.: Chemistry-transport model comparison with ozone observations in the midlatitude lowermost stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 17 479–17 496, 2001.

Considine, D. B., Connell, P. S., Bergmann, D. J., Rotman, D. A., and Strahan, S. E.: Sensitivity of Global Modeling Initiative model predictions of Antarctic ozone recovery to input meteorological fields, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D15301, doi:10.1029/2003JD004487, 2004.

Douglass, A. R., Prather, M. J., Hall, T. M., Strahan, S. E., Rasch, P. J., Sparling, L. C., Coy, L., and Rodriguez, J. M.: Choosing meteorological input for the global modeling initiative assessment of high-speed aircraft, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 27 545–27 564, 1999.

Douglass, A. R., Schoeberl, M. R., Rood, R. B., and Pawson, S.: Evaluation of transport in the lower tropical stratosphere in a global chemistry and transport model, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4259, doi:10.1029/2002JD002696, 2003.

Douglass, A. R., Stolarski, R. S., Strahan, S. E., and Connell, P. S.: Radicals and reservoirs in the GMI chemistry and transport model: Comparison to measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D16302, doi:10.1029/2004JD004632, 2004.

Fleming, E. L., Jackman, C. H., Stolarski, R. S., and Considine, D. B.: Simulation of stratospheric tracers using an improved empirically based two-dimensional model transport formulation, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 23 911–23 934, 1999.

Hall, T. M., Waugh, D. W., Boering, K. A., and Plumb, R. A.: Evaluation of transport in stratospheric models, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 18 815–18 839, 1999.

IPCC: Climate Change 2001: The scientific basis, The third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2001.

Lin, S.-J. and Rood, R. B: Multidimensional flux form semi-Lagrangian transport schemes, Mon. Wea. Rev., 124, 2046–2070, 1996.

Lin, S.-J.: A vertically Lagrangian finite-volume dynamical core for global models, Mon Wea. Rev., 132, 2293–2307, 2004.

MacKenzie, I. A. and Harwood, R. S.: Arctic ozone destruction and chemical-radiative interaction, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 9033–9051, 2000.

Mote, P. W., Rosenlof, K. H., McIntyre, M. C., et al.: An atmospheric tape recorder: The imprint of tropical tropopause temperatures on stratospheric water vapor, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 3989–4006, 1996.

Park, J. H., Gordley, L. L., Drayson, S. R., et al.: Validation of halogen occultation experiment CH$_4$ measurements from the UARS, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 10 183–10 205, 1996.

Plumb, R. A.: A "tropical pipe" model of stratospheric transport, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 3957–3972, 1996.

Prather, M. H.: Numerical advection by conservation of second-order moments, J. Geophys. Res., 91, 6671–6681, 1986.

Rasch, P. J., Tie, X., Boville, B. A., and Williamson, D. L.: A three-dimensional transport model for the middle atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 999–1017, 1994.

Roche, A. E., Kumer, J. B., Nightingale, J. L., et al.: Validation of CH$_4$ and N$_2$O measurements by the CLAES instrument on the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 9679–9710, 1996.

Rood, R. B.: Numerical advection algorithms and their role in atmospheric transport and chemistry models, Rev. Geophys., 25, 71–100, 1987.

Rosenfield, J. E. and Schoeberl, M. R.: On the origin of polar vortex air, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 33 485–33 497, 2001.

Rotman, D. A., Tannahill, J. R., Kinnison, D. E., et al.: Global Modeling Initiative assessment model: Model description, integration, and testing of the transport shell, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 1669–1691, 2001.

Russell, G. L. and Lerner, J. A.: A new finite-differencing scheme for the tracer transport equation, J. Appl. Meteorol., 20, 1483–1298, 1981.

Ruth, S., Kennaugh, R., and Gray, L. J.: Seasonal, semiannual, and interannual variability seen in measurements of methane made by the UARS Halogen Occultation Experiment, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 16 189–16 199, 1997.

Searle, K. R., Chipperfield, M. P., Bekki, S., and Pyle, J. A.: The impact of spatial averaging on calculated polar ozone loss, 1. Model experiments, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 25 397–25 408, 1998.

Sparling, L.: Statistical perspectives on stratospheric transport, Rev. Geophys., 38, 417–436, 2000.

Strahan, S. E. and Douglass, A. R.: Evaluating the credibility of transport processes in simulations of ozone recovery using the Global Modeling Initiative three-dimensional model, J. Geophys. Res., D05110, doi:10.1029/2003JD004238, 2004.

Stolarski, R. S., Douglass, A .R., Steenrod, S. D., and Pawson, S.: Trends in stratospheric ozone: Lessons learned from a 3-D chemical transport model, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 1028–1041, 2006.

Tian, W. S. and Chipperfield, M. P.: A new coupled chemistry-climate model for the stratosphere: The importance of coupling for future O$_3$-climate predictions, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc, 131, 281–303, 2005.

Van den Broek, M. M. P., van Aalst, M. K., Bregman, A., et al.: The impact of model grid zooming on tracer transport in the 1999/2000 Arctic polar vortex, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 1833–1847, 2003.

Waugh, D. W. and Plumb, R. A.: Contour advection with surgery: A technique for investigating finescale structure in tracer transport, J. Atmos. Sci, 51, 530–540, 1994.

Waugh, D. W., Hall, T. M., Randel, W. J., et al.: Three-dimensional simulations of long-lived tracer using winds from MACCM2, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 21 493–21 513, 1997.

Williamson, D. L. and Rasch, P. J.: Two-dimensional semi-Lagrangian transport with shape preserving interpolation, Mon. Wea. Res., 117, 102–129, 1989.