<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-5-665-2005</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Early unusual ozone loss during the Arctic winter 2002/2003 compared to other winters</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Goutail</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pommereau</surname>
<given-names>J.-P.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lefèvre</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>van Roozendael</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Andersen</surname>
<given-names>S. B.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kåstad Høiskar</surname>
<given-names>B.-A.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dorokhov</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kyrö</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6">
<sup>6</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chipperfield</surname>
<given-names>M. P.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff7">
<sup>7</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Feng</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff7">
<sup>7</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>Service d’Aeronomie, CNRS, Verrières le Buisson, France</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<label>2</label>
<addr-line>Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (BIRA), Brussels, Belgium</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<label>3</label>
<addr-line>Danish Meteorological Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<label>4</label>
<addr-line>Institute for Air Research, Kjeller, Norway</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff5">
<label>5</label>
<addr-line>Central Aerological Observatory, Moscow, Russian, France</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff6">
<label>6</label>
<addr-line>Finnish Meteorological Institute, Sodankylä, Finland</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff7">
<label>7</label>
<addr-line>Institute of Atmospheric Science, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>02</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2005</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>5</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<fpage>665</fpage>
<lpage>677</lpage>
<permissions>
<license xlink:type="simple">
<license-p>This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/665/2005/acp-5-665-2005.html">This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/665/2005/acp-5-665-2005.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/665/2005/acp-5-665-2005.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/665/2005/acp-5-665-2005.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>Ozone loss during the winter 2002/2003 has been evaluated from comparisons
between total ozone reported by the SAOZ network and simulated in passive
mode by both REPROBUS and SLIMCAT. Despite the fact that the two models have
a different approach to calculate the descent inside vortex, both
evaluations provide similar results 18&amp;plusmn;4% using REPROBUS
and 20&amp;plusmn;4% using SLIMCAT and show that the loss started
around mid-December, at least ten to twenty days earlier than during any of
the previous eleven winters, except 1993/1994. This unusual behaviour is
consistent with the low temperatures reported in the stratosphere as well to
the signature of early chlorine activation indicated by ground-based,
balloon and satellite observations.

&lt;P  style=&quot;line-height: 20px;&quot;&gt;
A significant ozone loss is also simulated by the current versions of two
models, but of lesser amplitude compared to SAOZ, 13&amp;plusmn;2%
for REPROBUS and 16&amp;plusmn;2% for SLIMCAT, the underestimation
being already observed by mid-January. The early ozone depletion captured by
both model show that chemical depletion did indeed take place in December,
predominantly at the illuminated edge of the distorted vortex, but the
reason for the underestimation compared to the observations and the
differences among the models have still to be investigated.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="13"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>