<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-5-505-2005</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>A comparison of new measurements of total monoterpene flux with improved measurements of speciated monoterpene flux</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Schade</surname>
<given-names>G. W.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Holzinger</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Goldstein</surname>
<given-names>A. H.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, 151 Hilgard Hall # 3110, Berkeley, CA 94720-3110, USA</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<label>2</label>
<addr-line>Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, NW1, Otto-Hahn-Allee 1, D-28359 Bremen, Germany</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>15</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2005</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>5</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<fpage>505</fpage>
<lpage>513</lpage>
<permissions>
<license xlink:type="simple">
<license-p>This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/505/2005/acp-5-505-2005.html">This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/505/2005/acp-5-505-2005.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/505/2005/acp-5-505-2005.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/505/2005/acp-5-505-2005.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>Many monoterpenes have been identified in forest emissions using gas
chromatography (GC). Until now, it has been impossible to determine whether
all monoterpenes are appropriately measured using GC techniques. We used a
proton transfer reaction mass spectrometer (PTR-MS) coupled with the eddy
covariance (EC) technique to measure mixing ratios and fluxes of total
monoterpenes above a ponderosa pine plantation. We compared PTR-MS-EC
results with simultaneous measurements of eight speciated monoterpenes,
&amp;beta;-pinene, &amp;alpha;-pinene, 3-carene, d-limonene, &amp;beta;-phellandrene,
&amp;alpha;-terpinene, camphene, and terpinolene, made with an
automated, in situ gas chromatograph with flame ionization detectors
(GC-FID), coupled to a relaxed eddy accumulation system (REA). Monoterpene
mixing ratios and fluxes measured by PTR-MS averaged 30&amp;plusmn;2.3% and
31&amp;plusmn;9.2% larger than by GC-FID, with larger mixing ratio
discrepancies between the two techniques at night than during the day. Two
unidentified peaks that correlated with &amp;beta;-pinene were resolved in the
chromatograms and completely accounted for the daytime difference and
reduced the nighttime mixing ratio difference to 20&amp;plusmn;2.9%.
Measurements of total monoterpenes by PTR-MS-EC indicated that GC-FID-REA
measured the common, longer-lived monoterpenes well, but that additional
terpenes were emitted from the ecosystem that represented an important
contribution to the total mixing ratio above the forest at night.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="9"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>