<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/inc/acp/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7316</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7324</eissn>
		<volume_number>5</volume_number>
		<issue_number>12</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2005</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acp-5-3205-2005</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/3205/2005/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/3205/2005/acp-5-3205-2005.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/3205/2005/acp-5-3205-2005.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>3205</start_page>
	<end_page>3218</end_page>
	<publication_date>2005-12-05</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Influence of convective transport on tropospheric ozone and its precursors in a chemistry-climate model</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>R. M. Doherty</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>D. S. Stevenson</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="2">
			<name>W. J. Collins</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="2">
			<name>M. G. Sanderson</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Institute of Atmospheric and Environmental Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, Met Office, Exeter, UK</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">The impact of convection on tropospheric O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; and its precursors has been
examined in a coupled chemistry-climate model. There are two ways that
convection affects O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;. First, convection affects O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; by vertical
mixing of O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; itself. Convection lifts lower tropospheric air to regions
where the O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; lifetime is longer, whilst mass-balance subsidence mixes
O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;-rich upper tropospheric (UT) air downwards to regions where the
O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; lifetime is shorter. This tends to decrease UT O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; and the
overall tropospheric column of O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;. Secondly, convection affects O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;
by vertical mixing of O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; precursors. This affects O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; chemical
production and destruction. Convection transports isoprene and its
degradation products to the UT where they interact with lightning NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt;
to produce PAN, at the expense of NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt;. In our model, we find that
convection reduces UT NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt; through this mechanism; convective
down-mixing also flattens our imposed profile of lightning emissions,
further reducing UT NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt;. Over tropical land, which has large lightning
NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt; emissions in the UT, we find convective lofting of NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt; from
surface sources appears relatively unimportant. Despite UT NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt;
decreases, UT O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; production increases as a result of UT HO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt;
increases driven by isoprene oxidation chemistry. However, UT O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; tends
to decrease, as the effect of convective overturning of O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; itself
dominates over changes in O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; chemistry. Convective transport also
reduces UT O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; in the mid-latitudes resulting in a 13% decrease in
the global tropospheric O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; burden. These results contrast with an
earlier study that uses a model of similar chemical complexity. Differences
in convection schemes as well as chemistry schemes &amp;ndash; in particular
isoprene-driven changes are the most likely causes of such discrepancies.
Further modelling studies are needed to constrain this uncertainty range.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

