ACP Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics ACP 1680-7324 Copernicus GmbH Göttingen, Germany 10.5194/acp-5-2961-2005 Refining temperature measures in thermal/optical carbon analysis Chow J. C. 1 Watson J. G. 1 Chen L.-W. A. 1 Paredes-Miranda G. 1 Chang M.-C. O. 1 Trimble D. 1 Fung K. K. 2 Zhang H. 3 Zhen Yu J. 3 Division of Atmospheric Sciences, Desert Research Institute, 2215 Raggio Parkway, Reno, NV 89512, USA Atmoslytic Inc., 24801 Alexandra Ct., Calabasas, CA 91302, USA Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, China 07 11 2005 5 11 2961 2972 This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/2961/2005/acp-5-2961-2005.html The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/2961/2005/acp-5-2961-2005.pdf

Thermal/optical methods have been widely used for quantifying total carbon (TC), organic carbon (OC), and elemental carbon (EC) in ambient and source particulate samples. Thermally defined carbon fractions have been used for source identification. Temperature precision in thermal carbon analysis is critical to the allocation of carbon fractions. The sample temperature is determined by a thermocouple, which is usually located in the oven near the sample. Sample and thermocouple temperature may differ owing to different thermal properties between the sample filter punch and the thermocouple, or inhomogeneities in the heating zone. Quick-drying temperature-indicating liquids (Tempil Inc., South Plainfield, NJ) of different liquefying points are used as temperature calibration standards. These consist of chemicals that change their appearance at specific temperatures and can be optically monitored to determine the sample temperature. Temperature measures were evaluated for three different models of carbon analyzers. Sample temperatures were found to differ from sensor temperatures by 10 to 50°C. Temperature biases of 14 to 22°C during thermal analysis were found to change carbon fraction measurements. The temperature indicators allow calibration curves to be constructed that relate the sample temperature to the temperature measured by a thermocouple.