<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-5-1341-2005</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Pole-to-pole validation of GOME WFDOAS total ozone with groundbased data</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Weber</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lamsal</surname>
<given-names>L. N.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Coldewey-Egbers</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bramstedt</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Burrows</surname>
<given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>07</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2005</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>5</volume>
<issue>5</issue>
<fpage>1341</fpage>
<lpage>1355</lpage>
<permissions>
<license xlink:type="simple">
<license-p>This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/1341/2005/acp-5-1341-2005.html">This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/1341/2005/acp-5-1341-2005.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/1341/2005/acp-5-1341-2005.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/1341/2005/acp-5-1341-2005.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>This paper summarises the validation of GOME total ozone retrieved
  using the Weighting Function Differential Optical Absorption
  Spectroscopy (WFDOAS) algorithm Version 1.0. This algorithm has been
  described in detail in a companion paper by
 Coldewey-Egbers et al. (2005). Compared to the operational GDP (GOME Data
  Processor) V3, several improvements to the total ozone retrieval
  have been introduced that account for the varying ozone dependent
  contribution to rotational Raman scattering, includes a new cloud
  scheme, and uses the GOME measured effective albedo in the
  retrieval. In this paper the WFDOAS results have been compared with
  selected ground-based measurements from the WOUDC (World Ozone and
  UV Radiation Data Centre) that collects total ozone measurements
  from a global network of stations covering all seasons.  From the
  global validation excellent agreement between WFDOAS and ground data
  was observed. The agreement lies within &amp;plusmn;1%, and very little
  seasonal variations in the differences are found.  In the polar
  regions and at high solar zenith angles, however, a positive bias
  varying between 5 and 8% is found near the polar night period. As a
  function of solar zenith angle as well as of the retrieved total
  ozone, the WFDOAS differences to ground polar data, however, show a
  much weaker dependence as compared to the operational GOME Data
  Processor Version&amp;nbsp;3 of GOME that represents a significant
  improvement.  Very few stations carry out simultaneous measurements
  by Brewer and Dobson spectrometers over an extended period (three
  years or more). Simultaneous Brewer and Dobson measurements from
  Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic (50.2N, 15.8E) and
  Hohenpeissenberg, Germany (47.8N, 11.0E) covering the
  period 1996-1999 have been compared with our GOME results.
  Agreement with Brewers are generally better than with the
  simultaneous Dobson measurements and this may be explained by the
  neglect of stratospheric (ozone) temperature correction in the
  standard ozone retrieval from the ground.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="15"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>