<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/inc/acp/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7316</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7324</eissn>
		<volume_number>5</volume_number>
		<issue_number>1</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2005</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acp-5-131-2005</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/131/2005/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/131/2005/acp-5-131-2005.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/131/2005/acp-5-131-2005.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>131</start_page>
	<end_page>138</end_page>
	<publication_date>2005-01-21</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Vortex-averaged Arctic ozone depletion in the winter 2002/2003</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>T. Christensen</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>B. M. Knudsen</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="2">
			<name>M. Streibel</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="1">
			<name>S. B. Andersen</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="3">
			<name>A. Benesova</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="6" affiliations="4">
			<name>G. Braathen</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="7" affiliations="5">
			<name>H. Claude</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="8" affiliations="6">
			<name>J. Davies</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="9" affiliations="7">
			<name>H. De Backer</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="10" affiliations="8">
			<name>H. Dier</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="11" affiliations="9">
			<name>V. Dorokhov</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="12" affiliations="10">
			<name>M. Gerding</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="13" affiliations="11">
			<name>M. Gil</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="14" affiliations="12">
			<name>B. Henchoz</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="15" affiliations="13">
			<name>H. Kelder</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="16" affiliations="14">
			<name>R. Kivi</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="17" affiliations="14">
			<name>E. Kyrö</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="18" affiliations="15">
			<name>Z. Litynska</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="19" affiliations="16">
			<name>D. Moore</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="20" affiliations="8">
			<name>G. Peters</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="21" affiliations="3">
			<name>P. Skrivankova</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="22" affiliations="12">
			<name>R. Stübi</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="23" affiliations="14">
			<name>T. Turunen</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="24" affiliations="17">
			<name>G. Vaughan</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="25" affiliations="12">
			<name>P. Viatte</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="26" affiliations="4">
			<name>A. F. Vik</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="27" affiliations="2">
			<name>P. von der Gathen</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="28" affiliations="9">
			<name>I. Zaitcev</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Danish Meteorological Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research,Potsdam, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">Czech Hydrometeorological Institute, Prague, Czech Republic</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="4" content_type="html">Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Kjeller, Norway</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="5" content_type="html">Deutscher Wetterdienst, Hohenpeißenberg, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="6" content_type="html">Environment Canada, Downsview, Ontario, Canadany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="7" content_type="html">Royal Meteorological Institute, Brussels, Belgium</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="8" content_type="html">Deutscher Wetterdienst, Lindenberg, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="9" content_type="html">Central Aerological Observatory, Dolgoprudny, Moscow Region, Russia</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="10" content_type="html">Leibniz-Institue of Atmospheric Physics, Kühlungsborn, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="11" content_type="html">Instituto Nacional de Téchnica Aerospacial, Madrid, Spain</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="12" content_type="html">MeteoSwiss, Payerne, Switzerland</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="13" content_type="html">Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, De Bilt, Netherlands</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="14" content_type="html">Finnish Meteorological Institute, Sodankylä, Finland</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="15" content_type="html">IMWM, Centre of Aerology, Legionowo, Poland</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="16" content_type="html">UK Met Office, Exeter, UK</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="17" content_type="html">University of Wales, Aberystwyth, UK</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">A total ozone depletion of 68&amp;plusmn;7 Dobson units
between 380 and 525K from 10 December 2002 to 10 March 2003 is derived
from ozone sonde data by the vortex-average method, taking into account
both diabatic descent of the air masses and transport of air into the vortex.
When the vortex is divided into three equal-area regions, the results are
85&amp;plusmn;9DU for the collar region (closest to the edge), 52&amp;plusmn;5DU
for the vortex centre and 68&amp;plusmn;7DU for the middle region in between
centre and collar.

&lt;P  style=&quot;line-height: 20px;&quot;&gt;
Our results compare well with other studies: We find good agreement with
ozone loss deduced from SAOZ data, with results inferred from POAM&amp;nbsp;III
observations and with results from tracer-tracer correlations using
HF as the long-lived tracer. We find a higher ozone loss than
that deduced by  tracer-tracer correlations using CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;.

&lt;P  style=&quot;line-height: 20px;&quot;&gt;
We have made a careful comparison with Match results: The results were
recalculated using a common time period, vortex edge definition and
height interval. The two methods generally compare very well, except
at the 475K level which exhibits an unexplained discrepancy.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

