<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-3-863-2003</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Commentary on &quot;Homogeneous nucleation of NAD and NAT in liquid stratospheric aerosols: insufficient to explain denitrification&quot; by Knopf et al.</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tabazadeh</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>NASA Ames Research Center, Earth Science Division, Moffett Field, CA 94035</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>24</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2003</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>3</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<fpage>863</fpage>
<lpage>865</lpage>
<permissions>
<license xlink:type="simple">
<license-p>This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/3/863/2003/acp-3-863-2003.html">This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/3/863/2003/acp-3-863-2003.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/3/863/2003/acp-3-863-2003.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/3/863/2003/acp-3-863-2003.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>In a recent published paper Knopf et a1. (2002) have suggested that the
      homogeneous freezing behavior of stratospheric aerosols, under polar winter conditions,
      can be simulated experimentally in large bulk phase-sized droplet samples
      (0.12-0.27 cm in diameter). Their hypothesis is based on the fact that a nucleus, which freezes the
      supercooled phase, forms within the bulk volume of a given sample, and therefore, if
      large bulk volumes don&apos;t freeze in the laboratory, then small volumes in particles most
      certainly remain unfrozen in the stratosphere. The important question to ask here is
      whether their initial hypothesis, which they have used to analyze their data, is even
      correct to begin with. For example, does a nucleus, which turns over the phase, forms
      within the bulk volume or on the surface of the supercooled phase? Some recent studies
      provide both experimental (Tabazadeh et al., 2002a, b) and theoretical (Djikaev et al.,
      2002, 2003) support for the formation of the nucleus at the surface of a supercooled
      droplet. If the homogeneous nucleation process initiates at the droplet surface, then the
      approach taken by Knopf. et al. to study this crystallization process may not be directly
      applicable to the stratospheric situation.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="3"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>