<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/inc/acp/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7316</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7324</eissn>
		<volume_number>3</volume_number>
		<issue_number>3</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2003</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acp-3-697-2003</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/3/697/2003/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/3/697/2003/acp-3-697-2003.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/3/697/2003/acp-3-697-2003.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>697</start_page>
	<end_page>712</end_page>
	<publication_date>2003-06-11</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Detailed modeling of mountain wave PSCs</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>S. Fueglistaler</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>S. Buss</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>B. P. Luo</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="1">
			<name>H. Wernli</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="2">
			<name>H. Flentje</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="6" affiliations="3">
			<name>C. A. Hostetler</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="7" affiliations="3">
			<name>L. R. Poole</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="8" affiliations="4">
			<name>K. S. Carslaw</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="9" affiliations="1">
			<name>Th. Peter</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zürich, Switzerland</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">DLR Oberpfaffenhofen, 82230 Wessling, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="4" content_type="html">School of the Environment, Univ. of Leeds, Leeds, UK</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">Polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) play a key role in polar ozone
      depletion. In the Arctic, PSCs can occur on the mesoscale due to orographically induced gravity waves. Here we present a detailed
      study of a mountain wave PSC event on 25-27 January 2000 over Scandinavia. The mountain wave PSCs were intensively observed by
      in-situ and remote-sensing techniques during the second phase of the SOLVE/THESEO-2000 Arctic campaign. We use these excellent
      data of PSC observations on 3 successive days to analyze the PSCs and to perform a detailed comparison with modeled clouds.
      We simulated the 3-dimensional PSC structure on all 3 days with a mesoscale numerical weather
      prediction (NWP) model and a microphysical box model (using best available nucleation
      rates for ice and nitric acid trihydrate particles). We show that the combined mesoscale/microphysical model is capable of reproducing
      the PSC measurements within the uncertainty of data interpretation with respect to spatial dimensions, temporal
      development and microphysical properties, without manipulating temperatures or using other tuning parameters.
      In contrast, microphysical modeling based upon coarser scale global NWP data,
      e.g. current ECMWF analysis data, cannot reproduce observations, in particular the occurrence of
      ice and nitric acid trihydrate clouds. Combined mesoscale/microphysical modeling may be used for detailed
      a posteriori PSC analysis and for future Arctic campaign flight and mission planning.
      The fact that remote sensing alone cannot further constrain model results due to uncertainities in the interpretation of measurements,
      underlines the need for synchronous in-situ PSC observations in campaigns.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

