<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-3-2067-2003</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>A revised parameterization for gaseous dry deposition in air-quality models</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Brook</surname>
<given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Vet</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>Meteorological Service of Canada, 4905 Dufferin Street, Toronto, Ontario, M3H 5T4, Canada</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>28</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2003</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>3</volume>
<issue>6</issue>
<fpage>2067</fpage>
<lpage>2082</lpage>
<permissions>
<license xlink:type="simple">
<license-p>This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/3/2067/2003/acp-3-2067-2003.html">This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/3/2067/2003/acp-3-2067-2003.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/3/2067/2003/acp-3-2067-2003.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/3/2067/2003/acp-3-2067-2003.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>A parameterization scheme for calculating gaseous dry deposition velocities in
      air-quality models is revised based on recent study results on non-stomatal uptake of
      O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; and SO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; over 5 different vegetation types. Non-stomatal resistance, which includes in-canopy
      aerodynamic, soil and cuticle resistances, for SO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; and O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; is parameterized as a function of
      friction velocity, relative humidity, leaf area index, and canopy wetness.
      Non-stomatal resistance for other chemical species is scaled to those of
      SO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; and O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; based on their chemical and physical characteristics. Stomatal resistance is calculated using a two-big-leaf stomatal resistance
      sub-model for all gaseous species of interest. The improvements in the present model compared to its
      earlier version include a newly developed non-stomatal resistance formulation, a realistic
      treatment of cuticle and ground resistance in winter, and the handling of seasonally-dependent
      input parameters. Model evaluation shows that the revised parameterization can provide more
      realistic deposition velocities for both O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; and SO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;, especially for wet canopies. Example model
      output shows that the parameterization provides reasonable estimates of dry deposition velocities
      for different gaseous species, land types and diurnal and seasonal variations. Maximum
      deposition velocities from model output are close to reported measurement values for different
      land types. The current parameterization can be easily adopted into different air-quality models
      that require inclusion of dry deposition processes.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="16"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>