<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/inc/acp/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7316</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7324</eissn>
		<volume_number>3</volume_number>
		<issue_number>5</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2003</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acp-3-1833-2003</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/3/1833/2003/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/3/1833/2003/acp-3-1833-2003.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/3/1833/2003/acp-3-1833-2003.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>1833</start_page>
	<end_page>1847</end_page>
	<publication_date>2003-10-31</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">The impact of model grid zooming on tracer transport in the 1999/2000 Arctic polar vortex</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>M. M. P. van den Broek</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="2">
			<name>M. K. van Aalst</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="3">
			<name>A. Bregman</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="2">
			<name>M. Krol</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="4">
			<name>J. Lelieveld</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="6" affiliations="5">
			<name>G. C. Toon</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="7" affiliations="6">
			<name>S. Garcelon</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="8" affiliations="6">
			<name>G. M. Hansford</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="9" affiliations="6">
			<name>R. L. Jones</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="10" affiliations="7">
			<name>T. D. Gardiner</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Space Research Organization of the Netherlands (SRON), Utrecht, The Netherlands</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research (IMAU), Utrecht, The Netherlands</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), De Bilt, The Netherlands</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="4" content_type="html">Max-Planck-Institut für Chemie (MPI), Mainz, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="5" content_type="html">Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), Pasadena, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="6" content_type="html">Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="7" content_type="html">National Physical Laboratory (NPL), Teddington, UK</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">We have used a 3D chemistry transport model to evaluate the transport of HF and
      CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; in the stratosphere during the Arctic winter of 1999/2000. Several model experiments were carried
      out with the use of a zoom algorithm to investigate the effect of different horizontal
      resolutions. Balloon-borne and satellite-borne observations of HF and CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; were used to test
      the model. In addition, air mass descent rates within the polar vortex were calculated and
      compared to observations.&lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      Outside the vortex the model results agree well with the observations, but inside the vortex
      the model underestimates the observed vertical gradient in HF and CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;, even when the
      highest available resolution (1º x 1º) is applied. The calculated diabatic descent rates agree
      with observations above potential temperature levels of 450 K. These model results suggest
      that too strong mixing through the vortex edge could be a plausible cause for the model
      discrepancies, associated with the calculated mass fluxes, although other reasons are also
      discussed.&lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      Based on our model experiments we conclude that a global 6º x 9º resolution is too coarse to
      represent the polar vortex, whereas the higher resolutions, 3º x 2º and
      1º x 1º, yield similar results, even with a 6º x 9º resolution in the tropical region.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

