<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/inc/acp/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7316</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7324</eissn>
		<volume_number>3</volume_number>
		<issue_number>5</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2003</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acp-3-1609-2003</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/3/1609/2003/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/3/1609/2003/acp-3-1609-2003.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/3/1609/2003/acp-3-1609-2003.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>1609</start_page>
	<end_page>1631</end_page>
	<publication_date>2003-10-06</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">An evaluation of the performance of chemistry transport models by comparison with research aircraft observations. Part 1: Concepts and overall model performance</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>D. Brunner</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>J. Staehelin</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="2">
			<name>H. L. Rogers</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="2">
			<name>M. O. Köhler</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="2">
			<name>J. A. Pyle</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="6" affiliations="3">
			<name>D. Hauglustaine</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="7" affiliations="4">
			<name>L. Jourdain</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="8" affiliations="5">
			<name>T. K. Berntsen</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="9" affiliations="5">
			<name>M. Gauss</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="10" affiliations="5">
			<name>I. S. A. Isaksen</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="11" affiliations="6">
			<name>E. Meijer</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="12" affiliations="6">
			<name>P. van Velthoven</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="13" affiliations="7">
			<name>G. Pitari</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="14" affiliations="7">
			<name>E. Mancini</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="15" affiliations="8">
			<name>G. Grewe</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="16" affiliations="8">
			<name>R. Sausen</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zürich, Switzerland</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Centre for Atmospheric Science, Cambridge University, UK</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de L’Environnement, Gif-sur-Yvette, France</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="4" content_type="html">Service d’Aéronomie, Paris, France</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="5" content_type="html">Department of Geophysics, University of Oslo, Norway, UK</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="6" content_type="html">Section of Atmospheric Composition, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, The Netherlands</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="7" content_type="html">Dipartimento di Fisica, Università L’Aquila, Italy</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="8" content_type="html">Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, DLR, Germany</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">A rigorous evaluation of five global Chemistry-Transport and two
      Chemistry-Climate Models operated by several different groups in Europe, was performed.  Comparisons were made of the models with trace gas
      observations from a number of research aircraft measurement campaigns during the four-year period
      1995-1998. Whenever possible the models were run over the same four-year period and at each simulation time step the
      instantaneous tracer fields were interpolated to all coinciding observation points. This approach allows for a very close
      comparison with observations and fully accounts for the specific meteorological conditions during the measurement flights.  This is
      important considering the often limited availability and representativity of such trace gas measurements. A new extensive
      database including all major research and commercial aircraft measurements between 1995 and 1998, as well as ozone
      soundings, was established specifically to support this type of direct comparison. Quantitative methods were applied to judge
      model performance including the calculation of average concentration biases and the visualization of correlations and RMS
      errors in the form of so-called Taylor diagrams. We present the general concepts applied, the structure and content of the
      database, and an overall analysis of model skills over four distinct regions. These regions were selected to represent various
      atmospheric conditions and to cover large geographical domains such that sufficient observations are available for comparison.  The comparison
      of model results with the observations revealed specific problems for each individual model. This study suggests the further
      improvements needed and serves as a benchmark for re-evaluations of such improvements. In general all models show
      deficiencies with respect to both mean concentrations and vertical gradients of important trace gases. These include ozone, CO and
      NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt; at the tropopause. Too strong two-way mixing across the tropopause is
      suggested to be the main reason for differences between simulated and observed CO and ozone values. The generally poor correlations
      between simulated and measured NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt; values suggest that in particular the
      NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt; input by lightning and the convective transport from the polluted boundary layer are still not well
      described by current parameterizations, which may lead to significant differences in the spatial and seasonal distribution
      of NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt; in the models. Simulated OH concentrations, on the other
      hand, were found to be in surprisingly good agreement with measured values.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

