<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-2-103-2002</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Chemistry-transport modeling of the satellite observed distribution of tropical troposheric ozone</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Peters</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Krol</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dentener</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Thompson</surname>
<given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lelieveld</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<label>2</label>
<addr-line>Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<label>3</label>
<addr-line>Goddard Space Flight Center, NASA, Maryland, USA</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<label>4</label>
<addr-line>Max Planck Institut für Chemie, Mainz, Germany</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>30</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2002</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>2</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<fpage>103</fpage>
<lpage>120</lpage>
<permissions>
<license xlink:type="simple">
<license-p>This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/2/103/2002/acp-2-103-2002.html">This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/2/103/2002/acp-2-103-2002.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/2/103/2002/acp-2-103-2002.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/2/103/2002/acp-2-103-2002.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>We have compared the 14-year record of satellite derived tropical
      tropospheric ozone columns (TTOC) from the NIMBUS--7 Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) to TTOC calculated by
      achemistry-transport model (CTM). An objective measure of error, based on the zonal distribution of TTOC in the
      tropics, is applied to perform this comparison systematically. In addition,
      the sensitivity of the model to several key processes in the tropics is quantified to select directions for future improvements. The comparisons
      indicate a widespread, systematic (20%) discrepancy over the tropical Atlantic Ocean, which maximizes during austral Spring. Although independent
      evidence from ozonesondes shows that some of the disagreement is due to satellite overestimate of TTOC, the Atlantic mismatch is largely due to a
      misrepresentation of seasonally recurring processes in the model. Only minor
      differences between the model and observations over the Pacific occur, mostly
      due to interannual variability not captured by the model. Although chemical
      processes determine the TTOC extent, dynamical processes dominate the TTOC
      distribution, as the use of actual meteorology pertaining to the year of observations always leads to a better agreement with TTOC observations than
      using a random year or a climatology. The modeled TTOC is remarkably insensitive to many model parameters due to efficient feedbacks in the ozone
      budget. Nevertheless, the simulations would profit from an improved biomass
      burning calendar, as well as from an increase in NO&lt;sub&gt;x &lt;/sub&gt;abundances in
      free tropospheric biomass burning plumes. The model showed the largest response to lightning
      NO&lt;sub&gt;x &lt;/sub&gt; emissions, but systematic improvements could not be found. The use of multi-year satellite derived tropospheric data
      to systematically test and improve a CTM is a promising new addition to existing methods of model validation, and is a first step to integrating
      tropospheric satellite observations into global ozone modeling studies. Conversely, the CTM may suggest improvements to evolving satellite retrievals
      for tropospheric ozone.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="18"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>