Direct oceanic emissions unlikely to account for the missing source of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide

Lennartz, Sinikka T.; Marandino, Christa A.; von Hobe, Marc; Cortes, Pau; Quack, Birgit; Simo, Rafel; Booge, Dennis; Pozzer, Andrea; Steinhoff, Tobias; Arevalo-Martinez, Damian L.; Kloss, Corinna; Bracher, Astrid; Röttgers, Rüdiger; Atlas, Elliot; Krüger, Kirstin

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-385-2017

Articles | Volume 17, issue 1

https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-385-2017

© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-385-2017

© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Articles | Volume 17, issue 1

Research article

|

10 Jan 2017

Research article |

| 10 Jan 2017

Direct oceanic emissions unlikely to account for the missing source of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide

Sinikka T. Lennartz, Christa A. Marandino, Marc von Hobe, Pau Cortes, Birgit Quack, Rafel Simo, Dennis Booge, Andrea Pozzer, Tobias Steinhoff, Damian L. Arevalo-Martinez, Corinna Kloss, Astrid Bracher, Rüdiger Röttgers, Elliot Atlas, and Kirstin Krüger

Download

Final revised paper (published on 10 Jan 2017)
Supplement to the final revised paper
Preprint (discussion started on 12 Sep 2016)
Supplement to the preprint

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

- Printer-friendly version

- Supplement

RC1: 'Review', Anonymous Referee #1, 08 Oct 2016
- AC1: 'Reply to reviewer#1', Sinikka Lennartz, 22 Nov 2016
RC2: 'Reivew of Lennartz et al', Anonymous Referee #2, 19 Oct 2016
- AC2: 'Reply to reviewer#2', Sinikka Lennartz, 22 Nov 2016
SC1: 'comment on Lennartz et al.'s paper', S. Belviso, 28 Oct 2016
- AC3: 'Reply to comment by S. Belviso', Sinikka Lennartz, 22 Nov 2016
SC2: 'Comments relating to the OCS photoproduction rates calculated by Lennartz et al.', Cedric Fichot, 09 Nov 2016
- AC4: 'Reply to comment by C. Fichot', Sinikka Lennartz, 22 Nov 2016

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

AR by Sinikka Lennartz on behalf of the Authors (22 Nov 2016) Manuscript

ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (25 Nov 2016) by Steven Brown

RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (05 Dec 2016)

ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (06 Dec 2016) by Steven Brown

AR by Sinikka Lennartz on behalf of the Authors (08 Dec 2016) Author's response Manuscript

Download

Article (2716 KB)
Full-text XML

Short summary

We present new sea surface and marine boundary layer measurements of carbonyl sulfide, the most abundant sulfur gas in the atmosphere, and calculate an oceanic emission estimate. Our results imply that oceanic emissions are very unlikely to account for the missing source in the atmospheric budget that is currently discussed for OCS.