Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2489-2518, 2015
http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/2489/2015/
doi:10.5194/acp-15-2489-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
06 Mar 2015
A comprehensive laboratory study on the immersion freezing behavior of illite NX particles: a comparison of 17 ice nucleation measurement techniques
N. Hiranuma1, S. Augustin-Bauditz2, H. Bingemer3, C. Budke4, J. Curtius3, A. Danielczok3, K. Diehl5, K. Dreischmeier4, M. Ebert6, F. Frank3, N. Hoffmann1, K. Kandler6, A. Kiselev1, T. Koop4, T. Leisner1, O. Möhler1, B. Nillius3,*, A. Peckhaus1, D. Rose3, S. Weinbruch6, H. Wex2, Y. Boose7, P. J. DeMott8, J. D. Hader9, T. C. J. Hill8, Z. A. Kanji7, G. Kulkarni10, E. J. T. Levin8, C. S. McCluskey8, M. Murakami11, B. J. Murray12, D. Niedermeier2,**, M. D. Petters9, D. O'Sullivan12, A. Saito11, G. P. Schill13, T. Tajiri11, M. A. Tolbert13, A. Welti7, T. F. Whale12, T. P. Wright9, and K. Yamashita11,*** 1Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research – Atmospheric Aerosol Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
2Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, Leipzig, Germany
3Institute for Atmospheric and Environmental Science, Goethe University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
4Faculty of Chemistry, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
5Institute for Atmospheric Physics, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
6Institute of Applied Geosciences, Technical University Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
7Institute for Atmosphere and Climate Science, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland
8Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
9Department of Marine Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
10Atmospheric Science and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA
11Meteorological Research Institute (MRI), Tsukuba, Japan
12Institute for Climate and Atmospheric Science, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
13Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
*now at: Max-Planck-Institut für Chemie, Mainz, Germany
**now at: Department of Physics, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA
***now at: Snow and Ice Research Center, Nagaoka, Japan
Abstract. Immersion freezing is the most relevant heterogeneous ice nucleation mechanism through which ice crystals are formed in mixed-phase clouds. In recent years, an increasing number of laboratory experiments utilizing a variety of instruments have examined immersion freezing activity of atmospherically relevant ice-nucleating particles. However, an intercomparison of these laboratory results is a difficult task because investigators have used different ice nucleation (IN) measurement methods to produce these results. A remaining challenge is to explore the sensitivity and accuracy of these techniques and to understand how the IN results are potentially influenced or biased by experimental parameters associated with these techniques.

Within the framework of INUIT (Ice Nuclei Research Unit), we distributed an illite-rich sample (illite NX) as a representative surrogate for atmospheric mineral dust particles to investigators to perform immersion freezing experiments using different IN measurement methods and to obtain IN data as a function of particle concentration, temperature (T), cooling rate and nucleation time. A total of 17 measurement methods were involved in the data intercomparison. Experiments with seven instruments started with the test sample pre-suspended in water before cooling, while 10 other instruments employed water vapor condensation onto dry-dispersed particles followed by immersion freezing. The resulting comprehensive immersion freezing data set was evaluated using the ice nucleation active surface-site density, ns, to develop a representative ns(T) spectrum that spans a wide temperature range (−37 °C < T < −11 °C) and covers 9 orders of magnitude in ns.

In general, the 17 immersion freezing measurement techniques deviate, within a range of about 8 °C in terms of temperature, by 3 orders of magnitude with respect to ns. In addition, we show evidence that the immersion freezing efficiency expressed in ns of illite NX particles is relatively independent of droplet size, particle mass in suspension, particle size and cooling rate during freezing. A strong temperature dependence and weak time and size dependence of the immersion freezing efficiency of illite-rich clay mineral particles enabled the ns parameterization solely as a function of temperature. We also characterized the ns(T) spectra and identified a section with a steep slope between −20 and −27 °C, where a large fraction of active sites of our test dust may trigger immersion freezing. This slope was followed by a region with a gentler slope at temperatures below −27 °C. While the agreement between different instruments was reasonable below ~ −27 °C, there seemed to be a different trend in the temperature-dependent ice nucleation activity from the suspension and dry-dispersed particle measurements for this mineral dust, in particular at higher temperatures. For instance, the ice nucleation activity expressed in ns was smaller for the average of the wet suspended samples and higher for the average of the dry-dispersed aerosol samples between about −27 and −18 °C. Only instruments making measurements with wet suspended samples were able to measure ice nucleation above −18 °C. A possible explanation for the deviation between −27 and −18 °C is discussed. Multiple exponential distribution fits in both linear and log space for both specific surface area-based ns(T) and geometric surface area-based ns(T) are provided. These new fits, constrained by using identical reference samples, will help to compare IN measurement methods that are not included in the present study and IN data from future IN instruments.


Citation: Hiranuma, N., Augustin-Bauditz, S., Bingemer, H., Budke, C., Curtius, J., Danielczok, A., Diehl, K., Dreischmeier, K., Ebert, M., Frank, F., Hoffmann, N., Kandler, K., Kiselev, A., Koop, T., Leisner, T., Möhler, O., Nillius, B., Peckhaus, A., Rose, D., Weinbruch, S., Wex, H., Boose, Y., DeMott, P. J., Hader, J. D., Hill, T. C. J., Kanji, Z. A., Kulkarni, G., Levin, E. J. T., McCluskey, C. S., Murakami, M., Murray, B. J., Niedermeier, D., Petters, M. D., O'Sullivan, D., Saito, A., Schill, G. P., Tajiri, T., Tolbert, M. A., Welti, A., Whale, T. F., Wright, T. P., and Yamashita, K.: A comprehensive laboratory study on the immersion freezing behavior of illite NX particles: a comparison of 17 ice nucleation measurement techniques, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2489-2518, doi:10.5194/acp-15-2489-2015, 2015.
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Seventeen ice nucleation measurement techniques contributed to investigate the immersion freezing behavior of illite NX. All data showed a similar temperature trend, but the measured ice nucleation activity was on average smaller for the wet suspended samples and higher for the dry-dispersed aerosol samples at high temperatures. A continued investigation and collaboration is necessary to obtain further insights into consistency or diversity of ice nucleation measurements.
Seventeen ice nucleation measurement techniques contributed to investigate the immersion...
Share