Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 995-1010, 2014
www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/995/2014/
doi:10.5194/acp-14-995-2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Does the POA–SOA split matter for global CCN formation?
W. Trivitayanurak1,* and P. J. Adams1,2
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
2Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
*now at: Department of Highways, Ministry of Transport, Thailand

Abstract. A model of carbonaceous aerosols has been implemented in the TwO-Moment Aerosol Sectional (TOMAS) microphysics module in the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model (CTM), a model driven by assimilated meteorology. Inclusion of carbonaceous emissions alongside pre-existing treatments of sulfate and sea-salt aerosols increases the number of emitted primary aerosol particles by a factor of 2.5 and raises annual-average global cloud condensation nuclei at 0.2% supersaturation (CCN(0.2%)) concentrations by a factor of two. Compared to the prior model without carbonaceous aerosols, this development improves the model prediction of condensation nuclei with dry diameter larger than 10 nm (CN10) number concentrations significantly from −45% to −7% bias when compared to long-term observations. Inclusion of carbonaceous particles also largely eliminates a tendency for the model to underpredict higher cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations. Similar to other carbonaceous models, the model underpredicts organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) mass concentrations by a factor of 2 when compared to EMEP and IMPROVE observations. Because primary organic aerosol (POA) and secondary organic aerosol (SOA) affect aerosol number size distributions via different microphysical processes, we assess the sensitivity of CCN production, for a fixed source of organic aerosol (OA) mass, to the assumed POA–SOA split in the model. For a fixed OA budget, we found that CCN(0.2%) decreases nearly everywhere as the model changes from a world dominated by POA emissions to one dominated by SOA condensation. POA is about twice as effective per unit mass at CCN production compared to SOA. Changing from a 100% POA scenario to a 100% SOA scenario, CCN(0.2%) concentrations in the lowest model layer decrease by about 20%. In any scenario, carbonaceous aerosols contribute significantly to global CCN. The SOA–POA split has a significant effect on global CCN, and the microphysical implications of POA emissions versus SOA condensation appear to be at least as important as differences in chemical composition as expressed by the hygroscopicity of OA. These findings stress the need to better understand carbonaceous aerosols loadings, the global SOA budget, microphysical pathways of OA formation (emissions versus condensation) as well as chemical composition to improve climate modeling.

Citation: Trivitayanurak, W. and Adams, P. J.: Does the POA–SOA split matter for global CCN formation?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 995-1010, doi:10.5194/acp-14-995-2014, 2014.
 
Search ACP
Final Revised Paper
PDF XML
Citation
Discussion Paper
Share