Articles | Volume 14, issue 23
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13257-2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13257-2014
Research article
 | 
12 Dec 2014
Research article |  | 12 Dec 2014

Comparison of the HadGEM2 climate-chemistry model against in situ and SCIAMACHY atmospheric methane data

G. D. Hayman, F. M. O'Connor, M. Dalvi, D. B. Clark, N. Gedney, C. Huntingford, C. Prigent, M. Buchwitz, O. Schneising, J. P. Burrows, C. Wilson, N. Richards, and M. Chipperfield

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Svenja Lange on behalf of the Authors (27 Oct 2014)  Author's response
ED: Publish as is (06 Nov 2014) by Steffen M. Noe
Download
Short summary
Globally, wetlands are a major source of methane, which is the second most important greenhouse gas. We find the JULES wetland methane scheme to perform well in general, although there is a tendency for it to overpredict emissions in the tropics and underpredict them in northern latitudes. Our study highlights novel uses of satellite data as a major tool to constrain land-atmosphere methane flux models in a warming world.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint