1Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Potsdam, Germany
2Institute of Energy and Climate Research – Stratosphere (IEK-7), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
3NorthWest Research Associates, Inc., Socorro, New Mexico, USA
4New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, New Mexico, USA
5Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
6University of York, York, UK
7Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA
8Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
9University of Wuppertal, Department of Physics, Wuppertal, Germany
10ISAC-CNR, Bologna, Italy
11Central Aerological Observatory, Dolgoprudny, Russia
Received: 13 Sep 2012 – Published in Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.: 05 Oct 2012
Abstract. Stratospheric chemistry and denitrification are simulated for the Arctic winter 2009/2010 with the Lagrangian Chemistry and Transport Model ATLAS. A number of sensitivity runs is used to explore the impact of uncertainties in chlorine activation and denitrification on the model results. In particular, the efficiency of chlorine activation on different types of liquid aerosol versus activation on nitric acid trihydrate clouds is examined. Additionally, the impact of changes in reaction rate coefficients, in the particle number density of polar stratospheric clouds, in supersaturation, temperature or the extent of denitrification is investigated. Results are compared to satellite measurements of MLS and ACE-FTS and to in-situ measurements onboard the Geophysica aircraft during the RECONCILE measurement campaign. It is shown that even large changes in the underlying assumptions have only a small impact on the modelled ozone loss, even though they can cause considerable differences in chemical evolution of other species and in denitrification. Differences in column ozone between the sensitivity runs stay below 10% at the end of the winter. Chlorine activation on liquid aerosols alone is able to explain the observed magnitude and morphology of the mixing ratios of active chlorine, reservoir gases and ozone. This is even true for binary aerosols (no uptake of HNO3 from the gas-phase allowed in the model). Differences in chlorine activation between sensitivity runs are within 30%. Current estimates of nitric acid trihydrate (NAT) number density and supersaturation imply that, at least for this winter, NAT clouds play a relatively small role compared to liquid clouds in chlorine activation. The change between different reaction rate coefficients for liquid or solid clouds has only a minor impact on ozone loss and chlorine activation in our sensitivity runs.
Revised: 12 Mar 2013 – Accepted: 24 Mar 2013 – Published: 17 Apr 2013
Citation: Wohltmann, I., Wegner, T., Müller, R., Lehmann, R., Rex, M., Manney, G. L., Santee, M. L., Bernath, P., Sumińska-Ebersoldt, O., Stroh, F., von Hobe, M., Volk, C. M., Hösen, E., Ravegnani, F., Ulanovsky, A., and Yushkov, V.: Uncertainties in modelling heterogeneous chemistry and Arctic ozone depletion in the winter 2009/2010, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 3909-3929, doi:10.5194/acp-13-3909-2013, 2013.