ACP Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics ACP 1680-7324 Copernicus GmbH Göttingen, Germany 10.5194/acp-12-9753-2012 Influence of air quality model resolution on uncertainty associated with health impacts Thompson T. M. 1 Selin N. E. 1 Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts, Ave., Bldg E19-411, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 26 10 2012 12 20 9753 9762 This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/9753/2012/acp-12-9753-2012.html The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/9753/2012/acp-12-9753-2012.pdf

We use regional air quality modeling to evaluate the impact of model resolution on uncertainty associated with the human health benefits resulting from proposed air quality regulations. Using a regional photochemical model (CAMx), we ran a modeling episode with meteorological inputs simulating conditions as they occurred during August through September 2006 (a period representative of conditions leading to high ozone), and two emissions inventories (a 2006 base case and a 2018 proposed control scenario, both for Houston, Texas) at 36, 12, 4 and 2 km resolution. The base case model performance was evaluated for each resolution against daily maximum 8-h averaged ozone measured at monitoring stations. Results from each resolution were more similar to each other than they were to measured values. Population-weighted ozone concentrations were calculated for each resolution and applied to concentration response functions (with 95% confidence intervals) to estimate the health impacts of modeled ozone reduction from the base case to the control scenario. We found that estimated avoided mortalities were not significantly different between the 2, 4 and 12 km resolution runs, but the 36 km resolution may over-predict some potential health impacts. Given the cost/benefit analysis requirements motivated by Executive Order 12866 as it applies to the Clean Air Act, the uncertainty associated with human health impacts and therefore the results reported in this study, we conclude that health impacts calculated from population weighted ozone concentrations obtained using regional photochemical models at 36 km resolution fall within the range of values obtained using fine (12 km or finer) resolution modeling. However, in some cases, 36 km resolution may not be fine enough to statistically replicate the results achieved using 2, 4 or 12 km resolution. On average, when modeling at 36 km resolution, an estimated 5 deaths per week during the May through September ozone season are avoided because of ozone reductions resulting from the proposed emissions reductions (95% confidence interval was 2–8). When modeling at 2, 4 or 12 km finer scale resolution, on average 4 deaths are avoided due to the same reductions (95% confidence interval was 1–7). Study results show that ozone modeling at a resolution finer than 12 km is unlikely to reduce uncertainty in benefits analysis for this specific region. We suggest that 12 km resolution may be appropriate for uncertainty analyses of health impacts due to ozone control scenarios, in areas with similar chemistry, meteorology and population density, but that resolution requirements should be assessed on a case-by-case basis and revised as confidence intervals for concentration-response functions are updated.

 References Abt Associates Inc: BenMAP, Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program, User's Manual, Prepared for the US EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, available at: http://www.epa.gov/airquality/benmap/docs.html (last access: July 2012), August 2010. Anderson, H. R., Atkinson, R. W., Peacock, J. L., Marston, L., and Konstantinou, K.: Metaanalysis of timeseries studies and panel studies of particulate matter (PM) and ozone (O<sub>3</sub>), Report of a WHO task group, World Health Organization, available at: http://www.euro.who.int/document/e82792.pdf (last access: June 2011), 2004. Arunachalam, S., Holland, A., Do, B., and Abraczinskas, M.: A quantitative assessment of the influence of grid resolution on predictions of future-year air quality in North Carolina, USA, Atmos. Environ., 40, 5010–5026, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.01.024doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.01.024, 2006. Arunachalam, S., Wang, B., Davis, N., Baek, B. H., and Levy, J. I.: Effect of chemistry-transport model scale and resolution on population exposure to PM$_2.5$ from aircraft emissions during landing and takeoff, Atmos. Environ., 45, 3294–3300, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.03.029doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.03.029, 2011. Bell, M. L., McDermott, A., Zeger, S. L., Sarnet, J. M., and Dominici, F.: Ozone and short-term mortality in 95 us urban communities, 1987–2000, JAMA: J. Am. Med. Assoc., 292, 2372–2378, http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.292.19.2372doi:10.1001/jama.292.19.2372, 2004. Bell, M. L., Goldberg, R., Hogrefe, C., Kinney, P., Knowlton, K., Lynn, B., Rosenthal, J., Rosenzweig, C., and Patz, J.: Climate change, ambient ozone, and health in 50 US cities, Climatic Change, 82, 61–76, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9166-7doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9166-7, 2007. Bickel, P. and Friedrich, R. (Eds.): ExternE: Externalities of Energy, Methodology 2005 Update, 2005. CDC: "Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report", Center for Disease Control and Prevention, available at: http://wonder.cdc.gov/mmwr/mmwr reps.asp (last access: December 2011), 2006. Chang, H. H., Zhou, J., and Fuentes, M.: Impact of Climate Change on Ambient Ozone Level and Mortality in Southeastern United States, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 7, 2866–2880, http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7072866doi:10.3390/ijerph7072866, 2010. Chen, J., Avise, J., Lamb, B., Salathé, E., Mass, C., Guenther, A., Wiedinmyer, C., Lamarque, J.-F., O'Neill, S., McKenzie, D., and Larkin, N.: The effects of global changes upon regional ozone pollution in the United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 1125–1141, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1125-2009doi:10.5194/acp-9-1125-2009, 2009. Cohan, D. S., Hu, Y., and Russell, A. G.: Dependence of ozone sensitivity analysis on grid resolution, Atmos. Environ., 40, 126–135, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.031doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.031, 2006. GeoLytics Inc.: Census 2015 Projection Methods, available at: http://geolytics.com/USCensus,Estimates-Projections,Data,Methodology,Products.asp (last access: November 2011), 2010. Grell, G., Dudhia, J., and Stauffer, D. R.: A description of the fifth generation Penn State/NCAR mesoscale model (MM5), Tech. Note NCAR/TN-398$+$STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, 1994. Henderson, B. H., Kimura, Y., McDonald-Buller, E., Allen, D. T., and Vizuete, W.: Comparison of Lagrangian Process Analysis tools for Eulerian air quality models, Atmos. Environ., 45, 5200–5211, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.06.005doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.06.005, 2011. Jang, J.-C. C., Jeffries, H. E., and Tonnesen, S.: Sensitivity of ozone to model grid resolution – II. Detailed process analysis for ozone chemistry, Atmos. Environ., 29, 3101–3114, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00119-Jdoi:10.1016/1352-2310(95)00119-J, 1995. Knowlton, K., Rosenthal, J. E., Hogrefe, C., Lynn, B., Gaffin, S., Goldberg, R., Rosenzweig, C., Civerolo, K., Ku, J.-Y., and Kinney, P. L.: Assessing Ozone-Related Health Impacts under a Changing Climate, Environ. Health Perspect., 112, 1557–1563, http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.7163doi:10.1289/ehp.7163, 2004. Kumar, N. and Russell, A. G.: Multiscale air quality modeling of the Northeastern United States, Atmos. Environ., 30, 1099–1116, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00317-7doi:10.1016/1352-2310(95)00317-7, 1996. Lam, Y. F., Fu, J. S., Wu, S., and Mickley, L. J.: Impacts of future climate change and effects of biogenic emissions on surface ozone and particulate matter concentrations in the United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 4789–4806, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4789-2011doi:10.5194/acp-11-4789-2011, 2011. NRC (National Research Council): Estimating the Public Health Benefits of Proposed Air Pollution Regulations, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2002. Parrish, D. D., Singh, H. B., Molina, L., and Madronich, S.: Air quality progress in North American megacities: A review, Atmos. Environ., 45, 7015–7025, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.09.039doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.09.039, 2011. Selin, N. E., Wu, S., Nam, K. M., Reilly, J. M., Paltsev, S., Prinn, R. G., and Webster, M. D.: Global health and economic impacts of future ozone pollution, Environ. Res. Lett., 4, 044014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/044014doi:10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/044014, 2009. Tagaris, E., Liao, K.-J., DeLucia, A. J., Deck, L., Amar, P., and Russell, A. G.: Potential Impact of Climate Change on Air Pollution-Related Human Health Effects, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 4979–4988, http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es803650wdoi:10.1021/es803650w, 2009. TCEQ: TexAQSII Field Study, available at: http://www.tceq.texas.gov/airquality/research/texaqs (last access: January 2010), 2006. TCEQ: Air Quality Modeling Files ftp Site, available at: ftp://ftp.tceq.state.tx.us/pub/OEPAA/TAD/Modeling/ (last access: January 2010), 2010a. TCEQ: Houston-Galveston-Brazoria Attainment Demonstration and Reasonable Further Progress State Implementation Plan Revisions for the 1997 Eight-Hour Ozone Standard, 10 March 2010, available at: http://www.tceq.texas.gov/airquality/sip/HGB eight hour.html, 2010b. Tie, X., Brasseur, G., and Ying, Z.: Impact of model resolution on chemical ozone formation in Mexico City: application of the WRF-Chem model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 8983–8995, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8983-2010doi:10.5194/acp-10-8983-2010, 2010. US EPA: Guidance on the Use of Models and Other Analyses for Demonstrating Attainment of Air Quality Goals for Ozone, PM$_2.5$, and Regional Haze, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Report B-07-002, available at: http://www.epa.gov/scram001/guidance/guide/final-03-pm-rh-guidance.pdf, April 2007. US EPA: Stochastic Human Exposure and Dose Simulation (SHEDS) Multimedia Model Version 3, Office of Research and Development: Human Exposure and Atmospheric Sciences, available at: http://www.epa.gov/heasd/products/sheds multimedia/sheds mm.html, 2010. US EPA: The Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act from 1990 to 2020, Office of Air and Radiation, Second Prospective Study, available at: http://www.epa.gov/oar/sect812/prospective2.html (last access: May 2011), 2011a. US EPA: Integrated Science Assessment for Ozone and Related Photochemical Oxidants, Office of Research and Development, available at: http://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf/264cb1227d55e02c85257402007446a4/F1FF5278C8BCEFA48525776D006DB48B/$File/Ozone_ISA_ERD1.pdf http://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/Ozone_ISA_ERD1.pdf (last access: May 2011), 2011b. Valari, M. and Menut, L.: Does an Increase in Air Quality Models' Resolution Bring Surface Ozone Concentrations Closer to Reality?, J. Atmos. Oceanic. Tech., 25, 1955–1968, http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2008JTECHA1123.1doi:10.1175/2008JTECHA1123.1, 2008. Valin, L. C., Russell, A. R., Hudman, R. C., and Cohen, R. C.: Effects of model resolution on the interpretation of satellite NO<sub>2</sub> observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11647–11655, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11647-2011doi:10.5194/acp-11-11647-2011, 2011. Vautard, R., Moran, M. D., Solazzo, E., Gilliam, R. C., Matthias, V., Bianconi, R., Chemel, C., Ferreira, J., Geyer, B., Hansen, A. B., Jericevic, A., Prank, M., Segers, A., Silver, J. D., Werhahn, J., Wolke, R., Rao, S. T., and Galmarini, S.: Evaluation of the meteorological forcing used for the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII) air quality simulations, Atmos. Environ., 53, 15–37, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.065doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.065, 2012. Wesson, K., Fann, N., Morris, M., Fox, T., and Hubbell, B.: A Multi-pollutant, risk-based approach to air quality management: Case study for Detroit, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 296–304, http://dx.doi.org/10.5094/APR.2010.037doi:10.5094/APR.2010.037, 2010. \hack West, J. J., Szopa, S. and Hauglustaine, D. A.: Human mortality effects of future concentrations of tropospheric ozone, C. R. Geosci., 339, 775–783, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2007.08.005doi:10.1016/j.crte.2007.08.005, 2007. Zanobetti, A. and Schwartz, J.: Is there adaptation in the ozone mortality relationship: A multi-city case-crossover analysis, Env. Health, 7, 22, http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-7-22doi:10.1186/1476-069X-7-22, 2008.