ACP Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics ACP 1680-7324 Copernicus GmbH Göttingen, Germany 10.5194/acp-12-7689-2012 On the robustness of aerosol effects on an idealized supercell storm simulated with a cloud system-resolving model Morrison H. 1 National Center for Atmospheric Research, 3090 Center Green Dr., Boulder, CO 80301, USA 23 08 2012 12 16 7689 7705 This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/7689/2012/acp-12-7689-2012.html The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/7689/2012/acp-12-7689-2012.pdf

A cloud system-resolving model (the Weather Research and Forecasting model) with 1 km horizontal grid spacing is used to investigate the response of an idealized supercell storm to increased cloud droplet concentrations associated with polluted conditions. The primary focus is on exploring robustness of simulated aerosol effects in the face of complex process interactions and feedbacks between the cloud microphysics and dynamics. Simulations are run using sixteen different model configurations with various microphysical or thermodynamic processes modified or turned off. Robustness of the storm response to polluted conditions is also explored for each configuration by performing additional simulations with small perturbations to the initial conditions. Differences in the domain-mean accumulated surface precipitation and convective mass flux between polluted and pristine conditions are small for almost all model configurations, with relative differences in each quantity generally less than 15%. Configurations that produce a decrease (increase) in cold pool strength in polluted conditions also tend to simulate a decrease (increase) in surface precipitation and convective mass flux. Combined with an analysis of the dynamical and thermodynamic fields, these results indicate the importance of interactions between microphysics, cold pool evolution, and dynamics along outflow boundaries in explaining the system response. Several model configurations, including the baseline, produce an overall similar storm response (weakening) in polluted conditions despite having different microphysical or thermodynamic processes turned off. With hail initiation turned off or the hail fallspeed-size relation set to that of snow, the model produces an invigoration instead of weakening of the storm in polluted conditions. These results highlight the difficulty of foreseeing impacts of changes to model parameterizations and isolating process interactions that drive the system response to aerosols. Overall, these findings are robust, in a qualitative sense, to small perturbations in the initial conditions. However, there is sensitivity in the magnitude, and in some cases sign, of the storm response to polluted conditions with small perturbations in the temperature of the thermal used to initiate convection (less than ±0.5 K) or the vertical shear of the environmental wind (±5%). It is concluded that reducing uncertainty in simulations of aerosol effects on individual deep convective storms will likely require ensemble methods in addition to continued improvement of model parameterizations.

 References Blyth, A. M. and Latham, J.: A climatological parameterization for cumulus clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 48, 2367–2371, 1991. Bryan, G. H., Wyngaard, J. C., and Fritsch, J. M.: Resolution requirements for the simulation of deep moist convection, Mon. Weather Rev., 131, 2394–2416, 2003. Dawson, D. T. II, Xue, M., Milbrandt, J. A., and Yau, M. K.: Comparison of evaporation and cold pool development between single-moment and multi-moment bulk microhysics schemes in idealized simulations of tornadic thunderstorms, Mon. Weather Rev., 138, 1152–1171, 2010. Ekman, A. M. L., Engstrom, A., and Soderberg, A.: Impact of two-way aerosol-cloud interaction and changes in aerosol size distribution on simulated aerosol-induced deep convective cloud sensitivity, J. Atmos. Sci., 68, 685–697, 2011. Fan, J., Zhang, R., Li, G., and Tao, W.-K.: Effects of aerosols and relative humidity on cumulus clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D14204, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008136doi:10.1029/2006JD008136, 2007. Fan, J., Yuan, T., Comstock, J. M., Ghan, S., Khain, A., Leung, L. R., Li, Z., Martins, V. J., and Ovchinnikov, M.: Dominant role by vertical wind shear in regulating aerosol effects on deep convective clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D22206, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012352doi:10.1029/2009JD012352, 2009. Fan, J., Leung, L. R., Li, Z., Morrison, H., Qian, Y., Zhou, Y., and Chen, H.: Aerosol impacts on clouds and precipitation in southeast China – Results from bin and bulk microphysics for the 2008 AMF-China field campaign, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D00K36, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016537doi:10.1029/2011JD016537, 2012. Gilmore, M. S. and Wicker, L. J.: The influence of midtropospheric dryness on supercell morphology and evolution, Mon. Weather Rev., 126, 943–-958, 1998. Gilmore, M. S., Straka, J. M., and Rasmussen, E. N.: Precipitation uncertainty due to variations in precipitation particle parameters within a simple microphysics scheme, Mon. Weather Rev., 132, 2610–2627, 2004. Grabowski, W. W.: Indirect impact of atmospheric aerosols in idealized simulations of convective-radiative equilibrium, J. Climate, 19, 4664–4682, 2006. Hack, J. J. and Pedretti, J. A.: Assessment of solution uncertainties in single-column modeling frameworks, J. Climate, 13, 352–365, 2000. James, R. P. and Markowski, P. M.: A numerical investigation of the effects of dry air aloft on deep convection, Mon. Weather Rev., 138, 140–161, 2010. Khain, A. P.: Notes on state-of-the-art investigation of aerosol effects on precipitation: A critical review, Environ Res. Lett., 4, 015004, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/1/015004doi:10.1088/1748-9326/4/1/015004, 2009. Khain, A. P. and Lynn, B.: Simulation of a supercell storm in clean and dirty atmosphere using weather research and forecast model with spectral bin microphysics, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D19209, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011827doi:10.1029/2009JD011827, 2009. Khain, A. P., Rosenfeld, D., and Pokrovsky, A.: Aerosol impact on the dynamics and microphysics of deep convective clouds, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 131, 2639–2663, 2005. Khain, A. P., Leung, L. R., Lynn, B., and Ghan, S.: Effects of aerosols on the dynamics and microphysics of squall lines simulated by spectral bin and bulk parameterization schemes, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D22203, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011902doi:10.1029/2009JD011902, 2009. Klemp, J. B.: Dynamics of tornadic thunderstorms, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 19, 369–402, 1987. Klemp, J. B. and Wilhemson, R. B.: Simulation of right- and left-moving storms produced through storm splitting, J. Atmos. Sci., 35, 1097–1110, 1978. Koren, I., Kaufman, Y. J., Rosenfeld, D., Remer, L. A., and Rudich, Y.: Aerosol invigoration and restructuring of Atlantic convective clouds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L14828, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005GL0232187doi:10.1029/2005GL0232187, 2005. Lebo, Z. J. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Theoretical basis for convective invigoration due to increased aerosol concentration, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 5407–5429, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5407-2011doi:10.5194/acp-11-5407-2011, 2011. Lebo, Z. J., Morrison, H., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Are simulated aerosol-induced effects on deep convective clouds strongly dependent on saturation adjustment?, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 12, 10059–10114, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acpd-12-10059-2012doi:10.5194/acpd-12-10059-2012, 2012. Lee, S. S.: Dependence of aerosol-precipitation interactions on humidity in a multiple-cloud system, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 10, 25287–25327, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acpd-10-25287-2010doi:10.5194/acpd-10-25287-2010, 2010. Lee, S. S., Donner, L. J., Phillips, V. T. J., and Ming, Y.: Examination of aerosol effects on precipitation in deep convective clouds during the 1997 ARM summer experiment, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 134, 1201–1220, 2008. Levin, Z. and Cotton, W. R.: Aerosol Pollution Impacts on Precipitation – A Scientific Review, Springer, The Netherlands, 2009. Li, X., Tao, W.-K., Khain, A. P., Simpson, J., and Johnson, D. E.: Sensitivity of a cloud-resolving model to bulk and explicit bin microphysical schemes. Part 1: Validation with a PRE-STORM case, J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 3–21, 2009a. Li, X., Tao, W.-K., Khain, A. P., Simpson, J., and Johnson, D. E.: Sensitivity of a cloud-resolving model to bulk and explicit bin microphysical schemes. Part 2: Cloud microphysics and dynamics interaction, J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 3–21, 2009b. Lorenz, E.: The predictability of a flow which possesses many scales of motion, Tellus, 21, 289–307, 1969. Lynn, B., Khain, A., Dudhia, J., Rosenfeld, D., Povrovsky, A., and Seifert, A.: Spectral (bin) microphysics coupled with a mesoscale model (MM5). Part I, Model description of first results, Mon. Weather Rev., 133, 44–58, 2005. Milbrandt, J. A. and Yau, M. K.: A multimoment bulk microphysics parameterization. Part IV: Sensitivity experiments, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 3137–3159, 2006. Morrison, H. and Grabowski, W. W.: Cloud system-resolving model simulations of aerosol indirect effects on tropical deep convection and its thermodynamic environment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 10503–10523, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10503-2011doi:10.5194/acp-11-10503-2011, 2011. Morrison, H. and Milbrandt, J. A.: Comparison of two-moment bulk microphysics schemes in idealized supercell thunderstorm simulations, Mon. Weather Rev., 139, 1103–1130, 2011. Morrison, H., Thompson, G., and Tatarskii, V.: Impact of cloud microphysics on the development of trailing stratiform precipitation in a simulated squall line: Comparison of one- and two-moment schemes, Mon. Weather Rev., 137, 991-1007, 2009. Noppel, H., Blahak, U., Seifert, A., and Beheng, K. D.: Simulations of a hailstorm and the impact of CCN using an advanced two-moment cloud microphysical scheme, Atmos. Res., 96, 286–301, 2010. Phillips, V. T. J., Pokrovsky, A., and Khain, A.: The influence of time-dependent melting on the dynamics and precipitation production in maritime and continental storm clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 338–359, 2007. Rosenfeld, D., Lohmann, U., Raga, G. B., O'Dowd, C. D., Kumala, M., Fuzzi, S., Reissell, A., and Andrae, M. O.: Flood or drought: How do aerosols affect precipitation?, Science, 321, 1309–1313, 2008. Seifert, A. and Beheng, K. D.: A two-moment cloud microphysics parameterization for mixed-phase clouds. Part 2: Maritime vs. continental deep convective storms, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 92, 45–66, 2006. Seifert, A., Köhler, C., and Beheng, K. D.: Aerosol-cloud-precipitation effects over Germany as simulated by a convective-scale numerical weather prediction model, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 11, 20203–20243, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acpd-11-20203-2011doi:10.5194/acpd-11-20203-2011, 2011. Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O., Barker, D. M., Duda, M., Huang, X.-Y., Wang, W., and Powers, J. G.,: A description of the advanced research WRF version 3. NCAR Tech. Note TN-475+STR, 113~pp., 2008. Slawinska, J., Grabowski, W. W., and Morrison, H.: Impact of atmospheric aerosols on precipitation from deep organized convection: A prescribed-flow modeling study using double-moment bulk microphysics, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 135, 1906–1913, 2009. Storer, R. L., van den Heever, S. C., and Stephens, G.: Modeling aerosol impacts on convective storms in different environments, J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 3904–3915, 2010. Stevens, B. and Feingold, G.: Untangling aerosol effects on clouds and precipitation in a buffered system, Nature, 461, 607–613, 2009. Tan, Z.-M., Zhang, F., Rotunno, R., and Snyder, C.: Mesoscale predictability of moist baroclinic waves: Experiments with parameterized convection, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 1794–1804, 2004. Tao, W.-K., Li, X., Khain, A., Matsui, T., Lang, S., Simpson, J.: Role of atmospheric aerosol concentration on deep convective precipitation: Cloud-resolving model simulations, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D24S18, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008728doi:10.1029/2007JD008728, 2007. Tao, W.-K., Chen, J.-P., Li, Z., Wang, C., and Zhang, C.: Impact of aerosols on convective clouds and precipitation, Rev. Geophys., 50, RG2001, 2011RG000369, 1–62, 2012. Teller, A. and Levin, Z.: The effects of aerosols on precipitation and dimensions of subtropical clouds; a sensitivity study using a numerical cloud model, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 5, 7211–7245, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acpd-5-7211-2005doi:10.5194/acpd-5-7211-2005, 2005. van den Heever, S. C. and Cotton, W. R.: The impact of hail size on simulated supercell storms, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 1596–1609, 2004. van den Heever, S. C., Carrio, G. G., Cotton, W. R., DeMott, P. J., and Prenni, A. J.: Impacts of nucleating aerosol on Florida storms. Part I: Mesoscale simulations, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 1752–1775, 2006. van den Heever, S. C., and Cotton, W. R.: Urban aerosol impacts on downwind convective storms, J. Appl. Met. Clim., 46, 828–850, 2007. Wang, C.: A modeling study of the response of tropical deep convection to the increase of cloud condensation nuclei concentration: 1. Dynamics and microphysics, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D21211, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005720doi:10.1029/2004JD005720, 2005. Wang, H., Auligne, T., and Morrison, H.: The impact of microphysics scheme complexity on the propagation of initial \mboxperturbations, Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 2287–2296, 2012. Weisman, M. L. and Klemp, J. B.: The dependence of numerically simulated convective storms on wind shear and buoyancy, Mon. Weather Rev., 110, 504–520, 1982. Weisman, M. L. and Klemp, J. B.: The structure and classification of numerically simulated convective storms in directionally varying wind shears, Mon. Weather Rev., 112, 2479–2498, 1984. Weisman, M. L. and Rotunno, R.: "A theory for strong long-lived squall lines" revisited, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 361–382, 2004. Xie, X. and Liu, X: Effects of spectral dispersion on clouds and precipitation in mesoscale convective systems, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D06202, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014598doi:10.1029/2010JD014598, 2011. Zhang, F., Snyder, C., Rotunno, R.: Effects of moist convection on mesoscale predictability, J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 1173–1185, 2003. Zhang, F., Bei, N., Rotunno, R., Snyder, C., and Epifanio, C. C.: Mesoscale predictability of moist baroclinic waves: Convection-permitting experiments and multistage error growth dynamics, J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 3579–3594, 2007.