ACP Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics ACP 1680-7324 Copernicus GmbH Göttingen, Germany 10.5194/acp-12-1785-2012 Evaluation of cloud fraction and its radiative effect simulated by IPCC AR4 global models against ARM surface observations Qian Y. 1 Long C. N. 1 Wang H. 1 Comstock J. M. 1 McFarlane S. A. 1 Xie S. 2 Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA 17 02 2012 12 4 1785 1810 This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/1785/2012/acp-12-1785-2012.html The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/1785/2012/acp-12-1785-2012.pdf

Cloud Fraction (CF) is the dominant modulator of radiative fluxes. In this study, we evaluate CF simulated in the IPCC AR4 GCMs against ARM long-term ground-based measurements, with a focus on the vertical structure, total amount of cloud and its effect on cloud shortwave transmissivity. Comparisons are performed for three climate regimes as represented by the Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) sites: Southern Great Plains (SGP), Manus, Papua New Guinea and North Slope of Alaska (NSA). Our intercomparisons of three independent measurements of CF or sky-cover reveal that the relative differences are usually less than 10% (5%) for multi-year monthly (annual) mean values, while daily differences are quite significant. The total sky imager (TSI) produces smaller total cloud fraction (TCF) compared to a radar/lidar dataset for highly cloudy days (CF > 0.8), but produces a larger TCF value than the radar/lidar for less cloudy conditions (CF < 0.3). The compensating errors in lower and higher CF days result in small biases of TCF between the vertically pointing radar/lidar dataset and the hemispheric TSI measurements as multi-year data is averaged. The unique radar/lidar CF measurements enable us to evaluate seasonal variation of cloud vertical structures in the GCMs. <br><br> Both inter-model deviation and model bias against observation are investigated in this study. Another unique aspect of this study is that we use simultaneous measurements of CF and surface radiative fluxes to diagnose potential discrepancies among the GCMs in representing other cloud optical properties than TCF. The results show that the model-observation and inter-model deviations have similar magnitudes for the TCF and the normalized cloud effect, and these deviations are larger than those in surface downward solar radiation and cloud transmissivity. This implies that other dimensions of cloud in addition to cloud amount, such as cloud optical thickness and/or cloud height, have a similar magnitude of disparity as TCF within the GCMs, and suggests that the better agreement among GCMs in solar radiative fluxes could be a result of compensating effects from errors in cloud vertical structure, overlap assumption, cloud optical depth and/or cloud fraction. The internal variability of CF simulated in ensemble runs with the same model is minimal. Similar deviation patterns between inter-model and model-measurement comparisons suggest that the climate models tend to generate larger biases against observations for those variables with larger inter-model deviation. <br><br> The GCM performance in simulating the probability distribution, transmissivity and vertical profiles of cloud are comprehensively evaluated over the three ARM sites. The GCMs perform better at SGP than at the other two sites in simulating the seasonal variation and probability distribution of TCF. However, the models remarkably underpredict the TCF at SGP and cloud transmissivity is less susceptible to the change of TCF than observed. In the tropics, most of the GCMs tend to underpredict CF and fail to capture the seasonal variation of CF at middle and low levels. The high-level CF is much larger in the GCMs than the observations and the inter-model variability of CF also reaches a maximum at high levels in the tropics, indicating discrepancies in the representation of ice cloud associated with convection in the models. While the GCMs generally capture the maximum CF in the boundary layer and vertical variability, the inter-model deviation is largest near the surface over the Arctic.

 References % vor jede Referenz Ackerman, T. P. and Stokes, G. M.: The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program, Phys. Today, $56$, 38–44, 2003. Berg, L. and Stull, R.: Accuracy of point and line measures of boundary layer cloud amount, J. Appl. Meteor., 41, 640–650, 2002. Boers, R., de Haij, M. J., Wauben, W. M. F., Baltink, H. K., van Ulft, L. H., Savenije, M., and Long, C. N.: Optimized fractional cloudiness determination from five ground-based remote sensing techniques, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D24116, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014661doi:10.1029/2010JD014661, 2010. Bony, S., Colman, R., Kattsov, V. M., Allan, R. P., Bretherton, C. S., Dufresne, J.-L., Hall, A., Hallegatte, S., Holland, M. M., Ingram, W., Randall, D. A., Soden, D. J., Tselioudis, G., and Webb, M. J.: How Well Do We Understand and Evaluate Climate Change Feedback Processes?, J. Climate, 19, 3445–3482, 2006. Bretherton, C. S., McCaa, J. R., and Grenier, H.: A new parameterization for shallow cumulus convection and its application to marine subtropical cloud-topped boundary layers. Part I: Description and 1D results, Mon. Weather Rev., $132$, 864–882, 2004. Brooks, M. E., Hogan, R. J., and Illingworth, A. J.: Parameterizing the difference in cloud fraction defined by area and by volume as observed by radar and lidar, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 2248–2260, 2005. Cess, R. D., Zhang, M. H., Minnis, P., Corsetti, L., Dutton, E. G., Forgan, B. W., Garber, D. P., Gates, W. L., Hack, J. J., Harrison, E. F., Jing, X., Kiehi, J. T., Long, C. N., Morcrette, J.-J., Potter, G. L., Ramanathan, V., Subasilar, B., Whitlock, C. H., Young, D. F., and Zhou, Y. : Absorption of solar radiation by clouds: Observations versus models, Science, $267$, 496–499, 1995. Chou, M.-D., Suarez, M. J., Ho, C.-H., Yan, M. M.-H., and Lee, K.-T.: Parameterization of cloud overlapping and shortwave single-scattering properties for use in general circulation and cloud ensemble models, J. Climate, 11, 202–214, 1998. Clothiaux, E. E., Moran, K. P., Martner, B. E., Ackerman, T. P., Mace, G. G., Uttal, T., Mather, J. H., Widener, K. B., Miller, M. A., and Rodriguez, D. J.: The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program Cloud Radars: Operational Modes, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 16, 819–827, 1999. Clothiaux, E. E., Ackerman, T. P., Mace, G. G., Moran, K. P., Marchand, R. T., Miller, M. A., and Martner, B. E.: Objective determination of cloud heights and radar reflectivities using a combination of active remote sensors at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program Cloud and Radiation Test Bed (ARM CART) sites, J. Appl. Meteor., $39$, 645–665, 2000. Collins, W. D.: Parameterization of generalized cloud overlap for radiative calculations in general circulation models, J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 3224–3242, 2001. Collins, W. D., Rasch, P. J., Boville, B. A., Hack, J. J., McCaa, J. R., Williamson, D. L., Kiehl, J. T., Briegleb, B., Bitz, C., Lin, S.-J., Zhang, M., and Dai, Y.: Description of the NCAR Community Atmosphere Model (CAM3.0), Tech. Note TN-464+STR, 214 pp., Natl. Cent. for Atmos. Res. Boulder, Colorado, 2004. Comstock, J. M., Ackerman, T. P., and Mace, G. G.: Ground-based lidar and radar remote sensing of tropical cirrus clouds at Nauru Island: Cloud statistics and radiative impacts, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4714, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002203doi:10.1029/2002JD002203, 2002. Curry, J. A., Rossow, W. B., Randall, D., and Schramm, J. L.: Overview of Arctic cloud and radiation characteristics, J. Clim., $9$, 1731–1764, 1996. Del Genio, A. D., Yao, M. S., Kovari, W., and Lo, K. K. W.: A prognostic cloud water parameterization for global climate models, J. Climate, 9, 270–304, 1996. Dong, X. Q., Xi, B. K., and Minnis, P.: A Climatology of Midlatitude Continental Clouds from the ARM SGP Central Facility. Part II: Cloud Fraction and Surface Radiative Forcing, J. Climate, 19, 1765–1783, 2006. Dong, X., Xi, B., Crosby, K., Long, C. N., Stone, R. S., and Shupe, M. D.: A 10 year climatology of Arctic cloud fraction and radiative forcing at Barrow, Alaska, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D17212, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013489doi:10.1029/2009JD013489, 2010. Durr, B. and Philipona, R.: Automatic cloud amount detection by surface longwave downward radiation measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D05201, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004182doi:10.1029/2003JD004182, 2004. Garratt, J. R.: Incoming shortwave fluxes at the surface – a comparison of GCM results with observations, J. Climate, 7, 72–80, 1994. Geleyn, J.-F. and Hollingsworth, A.: An economical analytical method for the computation of the interaction between scattering and line absorption of radiation, Beitr. Phys. Atmos., 52, 1–16, 1979. Hahn, C., Rossow, W., and Warren, S.: ISCCP cloud properties associated with standard cloud types identified in individual surface observation, J. Climate, 14, 11–28, 2001. Illingworth, A. J., Hogan, R. J., O'Connor, E. J., Bouniol, D., Brooks, M. E., Delano, J., Donovan, D. P., Eastment, J. D., Gaussiat, N., Goddard, J. W. F., Haeffelin, M., Klein Baltink, H., Krasnov, O. A., Pelon, J., Piriou, J.-M., Protat, A., Russchenberg, H. W. J., Seifert, A., Tompkins, A. M., van Zadelhoff, G.-J., Vinit, F., Willén, U., Wilson, D. R., and Wrench, C. L.: Cloudnet – Continuous evaluation of cloud profiles in seven operational models using ground-based observations, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 88, 883–895, 2007. Kassianov, E., Long, C. N., and Ovtchinnikov, M.: Cloud Sky Cover versus Cloud Fraction: Whole-Sky Simulations and Observations, J. Appl. Meteor., 44, 86–98, http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JAM-2184.1doi:10.1175/JAM-2184.1, 2005. Kennedy, A. D., Dong, X., Xi, B., Minnis, P., Del Genio, A. D., Wolf, A. B., and Khaiyer, M. M.: Evaluation of the NASA GISS Single-Column Model Simulated Clouds Using Combined Surface and Satellite Observations, J. Climate, 23, 5175–5192, http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3353.1doi:10.1175/2010JCLI3353.1, 2010. Kollias, P. and Albrecht, B.: Vertical velocity statistics in fair weather cumuli at the ARM TWP Nauru climate research facility, J. Clim., 23, 6590–6604, http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3449.1doi:10.1175/2010JCLI3449.1, 2010. Kollias, P., Remillard, J., Luke, E., and Szyrmer, W.: Cloud radar Doppler spectra in drizzling stratiform clouds: 1. Forward modeling and remote sensing applications, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D13201, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015237doi:10.1029/2010JD015237, 2011. Li, Z., Moreau, L., and Arking, A.: On solar energy disposition: a perspective from observation and modeling, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 78, 53–70, 1997. Liu, Y., Wu, W., Jensen, M. P., and Toto, T.: Relationship between cloud radiative forcing, cloud fraction and cloud albedo, and new surface-based approach for determining cloud albedo, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 7155–7170, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7155-2011doi:10.5194/acp-11-7155-2011, 2011. Long, C. N.: Correcting for Circumsolar and Near-Horizon Errors in Sky Cover Retrievals from Sky Images, The Open Atmospheric Science Journal, 4, 45–52, http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874282301004010045doi:10.2174/1874282301004010045, 2010. Long, C. N. and Shi, Y.: The QCRad Value Added Product: Surface Radiation Measurement Quality Control Testing, Including Climatologically Configurable Limits, Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program Technical Report, ARM TR-074, 69 pp., available at: http://www.arm.gov, 2006. Long, C. N. and Shi, Y.: An automated quality assessment and control algorithm for surface radiation measurements, Open Atmos. Sci. J., 2, 23–37, http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874282300802010023doi:10.2174/1874282300802010023, 2008. Long, C. N., Slater, D. W., and Tooman, T.: Total Sky Imager (TSI) Model 880 Status and Testing Results, Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program Technical Report, ARM TR-006, 36 pp., available at: http://www.arm.gov, 2001. Long C. N., Ackerman, T. P., Gaustad, K. L., and Cole, J. N.: Estimation of Fractional Sky Cover from Broadband Shortwave Radiometer Measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D11204, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006475doi:10.1029/2005JD006475, 2006. Long, C. N., Dutton, E. G., Augustine, J. A., Wiscombe, W., Wild, M., McFarlane, S. A., and Flynn, C. J.: Significant decadal brightening of downwelling shortwave in the continental United States, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D00D06, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011263doi:10.1029/2008JD011263, 2009. Mace, G. G. and Benson, S.: The vertical structure of cloud occurrence and radiative forcing at the SGP ARM site as revealed by 8 years of continuous data, J. Climate, 21, 2591–2610, 2008. Marchand, R., Haynes, J., and Mace, G. G.: A comparison of simulated cloud radar output from the multiscale modeling framework global climate model with CloudSat cloud radar observations, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D00A20, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009790doi:10.1029/2008JD009790, 2009. Mather, J. H.: Seasonal variability in clouds and radiation at the Manus ARM Site, J. Climate, 18, 2417–2428, 2005. McFarlane, S. A. and~Evans, K. F.: Clouds and shortwave fluxes at Nauru. Part II: Shortwave flux closure, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 2602–2615, 2004. McFarlane, S. A., Mather, J. H., and Ackerman, T. P.: Analysis of tropical radiative heating profiles: A comparison of models and observations, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D14218, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008290doi:10.1029/2006JD008290, 2007. Meehl, G. A., Covey, C., Delworth, T., Latif, M., McAvaney, B., Mitchell, J. F. B., Stouffer, R. J., and Taylor, K. E.: The WCRP CMIP3 multi-model dataset: A new era in climate change research, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,88, 1383–1394, 2007. Naud, C. M., Del Genio, A., Mace, G. G., Benson, S., Clothiaux, E. E., and Kollias, P.: Impact of Dynamics and Atmospheric State on Cloud Vertical Overlap, J. Clim., $21$, 1758–1770, http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI1828.1doi:10.1175/2007JCLI1828.1, 2008. Potter, G. L. and Cess, R. D.: Testing the impact of clouds on the radiation budgets of 19 atmospheric general circulation models, J. Geophys. Res., $109$, D02106, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004018doi:10.1029/2003JD004018, 2004. Randall, D., Coakley Jr., J., Fairall, C., Kropfli, R., and Lenschow, D.: Outlook for research on subtropical marine stratiform clouds, B. Am. Meteor. Soc., 65, 1290–1301, 1984. Randall, D., Cess, R. D., Blanchet, J. P., Boer, G. J., Dazlich, D. A., Del Genio, A. D., Deque, M., Dymnikov, V., Galin, V., Ghan, S. J., Lacis, A. A., Le Treut, H., Li, Z.-X., Liang, X.-Z., McAvaney, B. J., Meleshko, V. P., Mitchell, J. F. B., Morcrette, J.-J., Potter, G. L., Rikus, L., Roeckner, E., Royer, J. F., Schlese, U., Sheinin, D. A., Slingo, J., Sokolov, A. P., Taylor, K. E., Washington, W. M., Wetherald, R. T., Yagai, I., and Zhang, M.-H.: Intercomparison and interpretation of surface energy fluxes in atmospheric general circulation models, J. Geophys. Res., $97$, 3711–3725, 1992. Rossow, W. B. and Schiffer, R. A.: ISCCP cloud data products, B. Am. Meteor. Soc., 72, 2–20, 1991. Stephens, G. L., Vane, D. G., Boain, R. J., Mace, G. G., Sassen, K., Wang, Z., Illingworth, A. J., O'Connor, E. J., Rossow, W. B., Durden, S. L., Miller, S. D., Austin, R. T., Benedetti, A., Mitrescu, C., and the CloudSat Science Team: : The cloudsat mission and the A-train, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., $83$, 1771–1790, http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-83-12-1771doi:10.1175/BAMS-83-12-1771, 2002. Shi, Y. and Long, C. N.: Best Estimate Radiation Flux Value Added Product: Algorithm Operational Details and Explanations, Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program Technical Report, ARM TR-008, 58 pp., available at: http://www.arm.gov, 2002. Shupe, M., Kollias, P., Matrosov, S., and Schneider, T.: Deriving Mixed-Phase Cloud Properties from Doppler Radar Spectra, J. Atmos. Tech., 21, 660–670, 2004. Stone, R. S., Dutton, E. G., Harris, J. M., and Longenecker, D.: Earlier spring snowmelt in northern Alaska as an indicator of climate change, J. Geophys. Res., $107$, 4089, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000286doi:10.1029/2000JD000286, 2002. Taylor, K. E.: Climate Radiative Responses and Clouds: What we are learning from CMIP3, 18TH ARM Science Team Meeting Norfolk, VA 13 March 2008. Tian, L. and Curry, J. A.: Cloud overlap statistics, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 9925–9935, 1989. Vavrus, S., Waliser, D., Schweiger, A., and Francis, J.: Simulations of 20th and 21st century Arctic cloud amount in the global climate models assessed in the IPCC AR4, Clim. Dynam., 33, 1099–1115, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00382-008-0475-6doi:10.1007/s00382-008-0475-6, 2009. Waliser, D. E., Li, J.-L. F., Woods, C. P., Austin, R. T., Bacmeister, J., Chern, J., Genio, A. D., Jiang, J. H., Kuang, Z., Meng, H., Minnis, P., Platnick, S., Rossow, W. B., Stephens, G. L., Sun-Mack, S., Tao, W.-K., Tompkins, A. M., Vane, D. G., Walker, C., and Wu, D.: Cloud ice: A climate model challenge with signs and expectations of progress, J. Geophys. Res., $114$, D00A21, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010015doi:10.1029/2008JD010015, 2009. Walsh, J. E., Chapman, W. L., and Portis, D. H.: Arctic Cloud Fraction and Radiative Fluxes in Atmospheric Reanalyses, J. Climate, 22, 2316–2334, http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2213.1doi:10.1175/2008JCLI2213.1, 2009. Wang, Y., Long, C. N., Leung, L. Y. R., Dudhia, J., McFarlane, S. A., Mather, J. H., Ghan, S. J., and Liu, X.: Evaluating regional cloud-permitting simulations of the WRF model for the Tropical Warm Pool International Cloud Experiment (TWP-ICE, Darwin 2006), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D21203, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012729doi:10.1029/2009JD012729, 2009. Warren, S. G., Eastman, R. M., and Hahn, C. J.: A survey of changes in cloud cover and cloud types over land from surface observations, 1971–96, J. Climate, $20$, 717–738, 2007. Webb, M., Senior, C., Bony, S., and Morcrette, J.-J.: Combining ERBE and ISCCP data to assess clouds in the Hadley Centre, ECMWF and LMD atmospheric climate models, Clim. Dynam., 17, 905–922, 2001. Wild, M.: Solar radiation budgets in atmospheric model intercomparisons from a surface perspective, Geophys. Res. Lett., $32$, L07704, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022421doi:10.1029/2005GL022421, 2005. Wild, M.: Short-wave and long-wave surface radiation budgets in GCMs: a review based on the IPCC-AR4/CMIP3 models, Tellus A, 60A, 932–945, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2008.00342.xdoi:10.1111/j.1600-0870.2008.00342.x, 2008. Wild, M., Ohmura, A., Gilgen, H., and Roeckner, E.: Validation of GCM simulated radiative fluxes using surface observations, J. Climate, $8$, 1309–1324, 1995. Wild, M., Ohmura, A., Gilgen, H., Roeckner, E., Giorgetta, M., and Morcrette, J. J.: The disposition of radiative energy in the global climate system: GCM versus observational estimates, Clim. Dynam., $14$, 853–869, 1998. Winker, D. M., Pelon, J., and McCormick, M. P.: The CALIPSO mission: Spaceborne lidar for observation of aerosols and clouds, Proc. SPIE, 4893, 1–11, 2003. Wu, D. L., Ackerman, S. A., Davies, R., Diner, D. J., Garay, M. J., Kahn, B. H., Maddux, B. C., Moroney, C. M., Stephens, G. L., Veefkind, J. P., and Vaughan, M. A.: Vertical distributions and relationships of cloud occurrence frequency as observed by MISR, AIRS, MODIS, OMI, CALIPSO, and CloudSat, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L09821, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009GL037464doi:10.1029/2009GL037464, 2009. Xi, B., Dong, X., Minnis, P., and Khaiyer, M. M.: A 10 year climatology of cloud fraction and vertical distribution derived from both surface and GOES observations over the DOE ARM SPG site, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D12124, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012800doi:10.1029/2009JD012800, 2010. Xie S., McCoy, R., Klein, S. A., Cederwall, R. T., Wiscombe, W. J., Clothiaux, E. E., Gaustad, K. L., Golaz, J. C., Hall, S., Jensen, M., Johnson, K. L., Lin, Y., Long, C. N., Mather, J. H., McCord, R. A., McFarlane, S. A., Palanisamy, G., Shi, Y., and Turner, D. D.: ARM Climate Modeling Best Estimate Data – A new data product for climate modelers, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 91, 13–20, http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2891.1doi:10.1175/2009BAMS2891.1, 2010 Zdunkowski, W. G., Panhans, W.-G., Welch, R. M., and Korb, G. J.: A radiation scheme for circulation and climate models, Contrib. Atmos. Phys., 55, 215–238, 1982. Zhang, M. H., Lin, W. Y., Klein, S. A., Bacmeister, J. T., Bony, S., Cederwall, R. T., Del Genio, A. D., Hack, J. J., Loeb, N. G., Lohmann, U., Minnis, P., Musat, I., Pincus, R., Stier, P., Suarez, M. J., Webb, M. J., Wu, J. B., Xie, S. C., Yao, M. S., and Zhang, J. H.: Comparing clouds and their seasonal variations in 10 atmospheric general circulation models with satellite measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D15S02, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005021doi:10.1029/2004JD005021, 2005.