References

ACP

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

ACP

1680-7324

Copernicus GmbH

Göttingen, Germany

10.5194/acp-12-11213-2012

Simulation of nitrate, sulfate, and ammonium aerosols over the United States

Walker

J. M.

¹ Philip

³ Martin

R. V.

³ ⁴ Seinfeld

J. H.

¹ ²

Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA

Department of Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA

Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

27 11 2012

12 22 11213 11227

This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/11213/2012/acp-12-11213-2012.html

The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/11213/2012/acp-12-11213-2012.pdf

Atmospheric concentrations of inorganic gases and aerosols (nitrate, sulfate, and ammonium) are simulated for 2009 over the United States using the chemical transport model GEOS-Chem. Predicted aerosol concentrations are compared with surface-level measurement data from the Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE), the Clean Air Status and Trends Network (CASTNET), and the California Air Resources Board (CARB). Sulfate predictions nationwide are in reasonably good agreement with observations, while nitrate and ammonium are over-predicted in the East and Midwest, but under-predicted in California, where observed concentrations are the highest in the country. Over-prediction of nitrate in the East and Midwest is consistent with results of recent studies, which suggest that nighttime nitric acid formation by heterogeneous hydrolysis of N2O5 is over-predicted based on current values of the N2O5 uptake coefficient, γ, onto aerosols. After reducing the value of γ by a factor of 10, predicted nitrate levels in the US Midwest and East still remain higher than those measured, and over-prediction of nitrate in this region remains unexplained. Comparison of model predictions with satellite measurements of ammonia from the Tropospheric Emissions Spectrometer (TES) indicates that ammonia emissions in GEOS-Chem are underestimated in California and that the nationwide seasonality applied to ammonia emissions in GEOS-Chem does not represent California very well, particularly underestimating winter emissions. An ammonia sensitivity study indicates that GEOS-Chem simulation of nitrate is ammonia-limited in southern California and much of the state, suggesting that an underestimate of ammonia emissions is likely the main cause for the under-prediction of nitrate aerosol in many areas of California. An approximate doubling of ammonia emissions is needed to reproduce observed nitrate concentrations in southern California and in other ammonia sensitive areas of California. However, even a tenfold increase in ammonia emissions yields predicted nitrate concentrations that are still biased low in the central valley of California. The under-prediction of nitrate aerosol in the central valley of California may arise in part from an under-prediction of both ammonia and nitric acid in this region. Since nitrate aerosols are particularly sensitive to mixed layer depths, owing to the gas-particle equilibrium, the nitrate under-prediction could also arise in part from a potential regional overestimate of GEOS-5 mixed layer depths in the central valley due to unresolved topography in this region.

References 1

Aneja, V. P., Chauhan, J. P., and Walker, J. T.: Characterization of atmospheric ammonia emissions from swine waste storage and treatment lagoons, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 11535–11545, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900066doi:10.1029/2000JD900066, 2000.

Bauer,~S E., Koch,~D., Unger,~N., Metzger,~S M., Shindell,~D T., and Streets,~D G.: Nitrate aerosols today and in 2030: a global simulation including aerosols and tropospheric ozone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5043–5059, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5043-200710.5194/acp-7-5043-2007, 2007.

Bey, I., Jacob, D J., Yantosca, R M., Logan, J A., Field, B D., Fiore, A M., Li, Q B., Liu, H. G Y., Mickley, L J., and Schultz, M G.: Global modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: model description and evaluation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 23073–23095, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD00080710.1029/2001JD000807, 2001.

Beer, R., Shephard, M. W., Kulawik, S. S., Clough, S. A., Eldering, A., Bowman, K. W., Sander, S. P., Fisher, B. M., Payne, V. H., Luo, M., Osterman, G. B., and Worden, J. R.: First satellite observations of lower tropospheric ammonia & methanol, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L09801, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033642doi:10.1029/2008GL033642, 2008.

Bouwman, A F., Lee, D S., Asman, W. A H., Dentener, F J., VanderHoek, K W., and Olivier, J G J.: A global high-resolution emission inventory for ammonia, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 11, 561–587, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/97GB0226610.1029/97GB02266, 1997.

Bowman, K. W., Rodgers, C. D., Sund-Kulawik, S., Worden, J., Sarkissian, E., Osterman, G., Steck, T., Luo, M., Eldering, A., Shephard, M. W., Worden, H., Clough, S. A., Brown, P. D., Rinsland, C. P., Lampel, M., Gunson, M., and Beer, R.: Tropospheric emission spectrometer: Retrieval method and error analysis, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 44, 1297–1307, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2006.871234doi:10.1109/TGRS.2006.871234, 2006.

Chen, D., Wang, Y., McElroy, M B., He, K., Yantosca, R M., and Le Sager, P.: Regional CO pollution and export in China simulated by the high-resolution nested-grid GEOS-Chem model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3825–3839, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3825-200910.5194/acp-9-3825-2009, 2009.

Clough, S. A., Shephard, M. W., Worden, J., Brown, P. D., Worden, H. M., Luo, M., Rodgers, C. D., Rinsland, C. P., Goldman, A., Brown, L., Kulawik, S. S., Eldering, A., Lampel, M. C., Osterman, G., Beer, R., Bowman, K., Cady-Pereira, K. E., and Mlawer, E. J.: Forward Model and Jacobians for Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer Retrievals, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 44, 1308–1323, 2006.

Evans, M. J. and Jacob, D. J.: Impact of new laboratory studies of \chemN_2O_5 hydrolysis on global model budgets of tropospheric nitrogen oxides, ozone, and OH, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L09813, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022469doi:10.1029/2005GL022469, 2005.

Fountoukis, C. and Nenes, A.: ISORROPIA II: a computationally efficient thermodynamic equilibrium model for \chemK^+-\chemCa^2+-\chemMg^2+-\chemNH_4^+-\chemNa^+-\chemSO_4^2-\chemNO_3^-\chemCl^-\chemH_2O aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4639–4659, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4639-200710.5194/acp-7-4639-2007, 2007.

Heald, C. L., Collett Jr., J. L., Lee, T., Benedict, K. B., Schwandner, F. M., Li, Y., Clarisse, L., Hurtmans, D. R., Van Damme, M., Clerbaux, C., Coheur, P.-F., Philip, S., Martin, R. V., and Pye, H. O. T.: Atmospheric ammonia and particulate inorganic nitrogen over the United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 10295–10312, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10295-2012doi:10.5194/acp-12-10295-2012, 2012.

Huang, M., Carmichael, G R., Adhikary, B., Spak, S N., Kulkarni, S., Cheng, Y F., Wei, C., Tang, Y., Parrish, D D., Oltmans, S J., D'Allura, A., Kaduwela, A., Cai, C., Weinheimer, A J., Wong, M., Pierce, R B., Al-Saadi, J A., Streets, D G., and Zhang, Q.: Impacts of transported background ozone on California air quality during the ARCTAS-CARB period – a~multi-scale modeling study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6947–6968, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6947-201010.5194/acp-10-6947-2010, 2010.

Koracin, D. and Berkowicz, R.: Nocturnal Boundary Layer Height: Observations by Acoustic Sounders and Prediction in Terms of Surface Layer Parameters, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 43, 65–83, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00153969doi:10.1007/BF00153969, 1988.

Lin, J. T. and McElroy, M. B.: Impacts of boundary layer mixing on pollutant vertical profiles in the lower troposphere: Implications to satellite remote sensing, Atmos. Environ., 44, 1726–1739, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.02.009doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.02.009, 2010.

Liu, H., Jacob, D J., Bey, I., and Yantosca, R M.: Constraints from \chem^210Pb and \chem^7Be on wet deposition and transport in a global three-dimensional chemical tracer model driven by assimilated meteorological fields, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 12109–12128, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000JD90083910.1029/2000JD900839, 2001.

Liu, Shuyan and Xin-Zhong, Liang: Observed Diurnal Cycle Climatology of Planetary Boundary Layer Height, J. Climate, 23, 5790–5809, http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3552.1doi:10.1175/2010JCLI3552.1, 2010.

Macintyre, H. L. and Evans, M J.: Sensitivity of a global model to the uptake of \chemN_2O_5 by tropospheric aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7409–7414, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7409-201010.5194/acp-10-7409-2010, 2010.

Montgomery, D C., Peck, E A., and Vining, G G.: Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis, 4th Edn., John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2006.

Myhre, G., Grini, A., and Metzger, S.: Modelling of nitrate and ammonium-containing aerosols in presence of sea salt, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4809–4821, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4809-200610.5194/acp-6-4809-2006, 2006.

Moncet, J.-L., Uymin, G., Lipton, A. E., and Snell, H. E.: Infrared radiance modeling by optimal spectral sampling, J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 3917–3934, 2008.

Nowak, J B., Neuman, J., Bahreini, R., Middlebrook, A M., Holloway, J., McKeen, S., Parrish, D., Ryerson, T., and Trainer, M.: Ammonia sources in the California South Coast Air Basin and their impact on ammonium nitrate formation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L07804, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012GL05119710.1029/2012GL051197, 2012.

Park, R J., Jacob, D J., Field, B D., Yantosca, R M., and Chin, M.: Natural and transboundary pollution influences on sulfate-nitrate-ammonium aerosols in the United States: implications for policy, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D15204, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD00447310.1029/2003JD004473, 2004.

Pye, H O T., Liao, H., Wu, S., Mickley, L J., Jacob, D J., Henze, D K., and Seinfeld, J.: Effect of changes in climate and emissions on future sulfate-nitrate-ammonium aerosol levels in the United States, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D01205, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD01070110.1029/2008JD010701, 2009.

Rodgers, C. D.: Inverse methods for atmospheric Sounding: Theory and Practice, World Sci., Hackensack, NJ, 2000.

Roelle, P. A. and Aneja, V. P.: Characterization of ammonia emissions from soils in the upper coastal plain, North Carolina, Atmos. Environ., 36, 1087–2097, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00355-7doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00355-7, 2002.

Seinfeld, J H. and Pandis, S.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics – From Air Pollution to Climate Change, 2nd Edn., John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2006.

Shephard, M. W., Clough, S. A., Payne, V. H., Smith, W. L., Kireev, S., and Cady-Pereira, K. E.: Performance of the line-by-line radiative transfer model (LBLRTM) for temperature and species retrievals: IASI case studies from JAIVEx, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 7397–7417, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7397-2009doi:10.5194/acp-9-7397-2009, 2009.

Shephard, M. W., Cady-Pereira, K. E., Luo, M., Henze, D. K., Pinder, R. W., Walker, J. T., Rinsland, C. P., Bash, J. O., Zhu, L., Payne, V. H., and Clarisse, L.: TES ammonia retrieval strategy and global observations of the spatial and seasonal variability of ammonia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 10743–10763, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10743-2011doi:10.5194/acp-11-10743-2011, 2011.

Sickles II, J. E. and Shadwick, D. S.: Precision of atmospheric dry deposition data from the Clean Air Status and Trends Network, Atmos. Environ., 36, 5671–5686, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00723-9doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00723-9, 2002.

Turner, A. J., Henze, D. K., Martin, R. V., and Hakami, A.: The spatial extent of source influences on modeled column concentrations of short-lived species, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L12806, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051832doi:10.1029/2012GL051832, 2012.

van Donkelaar, A., Martin, R. V., Pasch, A. N., Szykman, J. J., Zhang, L., Wang, Y. X., and Chen, D.: Improving the accuracy of daily satellite-derived ground-level fine aerosol concentration estimates for North America, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 11971–11978, http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es3025319doi:10.1021/es3025319, 2012.

Weseley, M L.: Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition in regional-scale numerical models, Atmos. Environ., 23, 1293–1304, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(89)90153-410.1016/0004-6981(89)90153-4, 1989.

Wu, S, Mickley, L. J., Jacob, D. J., Logan, J. A., and Yantosca, R. M.: Why are there large differences between models in global budgets of tropospheric ozone?, J. Geophys. Res, 112, D05302, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007801doi:10.1029/2006JD007801, 2007.

Zhang, L., Jacob, D J., Knipping, E M., Kumar, N., Munger, J W., Carouge, C C., van Donkelaar, A., Wang, Y X., and Chen, D.: Nitrogen deposition to the United States: distribution, sources, and processes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4539–4554, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4539-201210.5194/acp-12-4539-2012, 2012.

Zhang, L M., Gong, S I., Padro, J., and Barrie, L.: A size-segregated particle dry deposition scheme for an atmospheric aerosol module, Atmos. Environ., 35, 549–560, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00326-510.1016/S1352-2310(00)00326-5, 2001.

Zhu, L., Henze, D. K., Cady-Pereira, K. E., Shephard, M. W., Luo, M., Pinder, R. W., Bash, J. O., and Jeong, G.: Constraining U.S. ammonia emissions using TES remote sensing observations and the GEOS-Chem adjoint model, J. Geophys. Res., submitted, 2012.