References

ACP

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

ACP

1680-7324

Copernicus GmbH

Göttingen, Germany

10.5194/acp-11-5431-2011

Aerosol indirect effects in a multi-scale aerosol-climate model PNNL-MMF

Wang

¹ Ghan

¹ Ovchinnikov

¹ Liu

¹ Easter

¹ Kassianov

¹ Qian

¹ Morrison

Atmospheric Science and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA

Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA

09 06 2011

11 11 5431 5455

This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/5431/2011/acp-11-5431-2011.html

The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/5431/2011/acp-11-5431-2011.pdf

Much of the large uncertainty in estimates of anthropogenic aerosol effects on climate arises from the multi-scale nature of the interactions between aerosols, clouds and dynamics, which are difficult to represent in conventional general circulation models (GCMs). In this study, we use a multi-scale aerosol-climate model that treats aerosols and clouds across multiple scales to study aerosol indirect effects. This multi-scale aerosol-climate model is an extension of a multi-scale modeling framework (MMF) model that embeds a cloud-resolving model (CRM) within each vertical column of a GCM grid. The extension allows a more physically-based treatment of aerosol-cloud interactions in both stratiform and convective clouds on the global scale in a computationally feasible way. Simulated model fields, including liquid water path (LWP), ice water path, cloud fraction, shortwave and longwave cloud forcing, precipitation, water vapor, and cloud droplet number concentration are in reasonable agreement with observations. The new model performs quantitatively similar to the previous version of the MMF model in terms of simulated cloud fraction and precipitation. The simulated change in shortwave cloud forcing from anthropogenic aerosols is −0.77 W m−2, which is less than half of that (−1.79 W m−2) calculated by the host GCM (NCAR CAM5) with traditional cloud parameterizations and is also at the low end of the estimates of other conventional global aerosol-climate models. The smaller forcing in the MMF model is attributed to a smaller (3.9 %) increase in LWP from preindustrial conditions (PI) to present day (PD) compared with 15.6 % increase in LWP in stratiform clouds in CAM5. The difference is caused by a much smaller response in LWP to a given perturbation in cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations from PI to PD in the MMF (about one-third of that in CAM5), and, to a lesser extent, by a smaller relative increase in CCN concentrations from PI to PD in the MMF (about 26 % smaller than that in CAM5). The smaller relative increase in CCN concentrations in the MMF is caused in part by a smaller increase in aerosol lifetime from PI to PD in the MMF, a positive feedback in aerosol indirect effects induced by cloud lifetime effects from aerosols. The smaller response in LWP to anthropogenic aerosols in the MMF model is consistent with observations and with high resolution model studies, which may indicate that aerosol indirect effects simulated in conventional global climate models are overestimated and point to the need to use global high resolution models, such as MMF models or global CRMs, to study aerosol indirect effects. The simulated total anthropogenic aerosol effect in the MMF is −1.05 W m−2, which is close to the Murphy et al. (2009) inverse estimate of −1.1±0.4 W m−2 (1σ) based on the examination of the Earth's energy balance. Further improvements in the representation of ice nucleation and low clouds in MMF are needed to refine the aerosol indirect effect estimate.

References 1

Abdul-Razzak, H. and Ghan, S. J.: A parameterization of aerosol activation 2. Multiple aerosol types, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 6837–6844, 2000.

Ackerman, A. S., Kirkpatrick, M. P., Stevens, D. E., and Toon, O. B.: The impact of humidity above stratiform clouds on indirect aerosol climate forcing, Nature, 432, 1014–1017, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/Nature03174doi:10.1038/Nature03174, 2004.

Albrecht, B. A.: Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness, Science, 245, 1227–1230, 1989.

Arimoto, R., Duce, R. A., Savoie, D. L., Prospero, J. M., Talbot, R., Cullen, J. D., Tomza, U., Lewis, N. F., and Jay, B. J.: Relationships among aerosol constituents from Asia and the North Pacific during PEM-West A, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 2011–2023, 1996.

Austin, R. T., Heymsfield, A. J., and Stephens, G. L.: Retrieval of ice cloud microphysical parameters using the CloudSat millimeter-wave radar and temperature, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D00A23, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010049doi:10.1029/2008jd010049, 2009.

Bigg, E. K.: The Supercooling of Water, P. Phys. Soc. Lond. B, 66, 688–694, 1953.

Bodhaine, B. A.: Aerosol Absorption-Measurements at Barrow, Mauna-Loa and the South-Pole, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 8967–8975, 1995.

Coakley, J. A. and Walsh, C. D.: Limits to the aerosol indirect radiative effect derived from observations of ship tracks, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 668–680, 2002.

Cooper, W. A.: Ice Initiation in natural clouds, in: Precipitation Enhancement – A Scientific Challenge, Meteor. Monogr., Amer. Meteor. Soc., Boston, United States, 29–32, 1986.

Del Genio, A. D., Kovari, W., Yao, M. S., and Jonas, J.: Cumulus microphysics and climate sensitivity, J. Climate, 18, 2376–2387, 2005.

Dentener, F., Kinne, S., Bond, T., Boucher, O., Cofala, J., Generoso, S., Ginoux, P., Gong, S., Hoelzemann, J. J., Ito, A., Marelli, L., Penner, J. E., Putaud, J.-P., Textor, C., Schulz, M., van der Werf, G. R., and Wilson, J.: Emissions of primary aerosol and precursor gases in the years 2000 and 1750 prescribed data-sets for AeroCom, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4321–4344, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4321-2006doi:10.5194/acp-6-4321-2006, 2006.

Emanuel, K. A. and Zivkovic-Rothman, M.: Development and evaluation of a convection scheme for use in climate models, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 1766–1782, 1999.

Ferraro, R. R., Weng, F. Z., Grody, N. C., and Basist, A.: An eight-year (1987-1994) time series of rainfall, clouds, water vapor, snow cover, and sea ice derived from SSM/I measurements, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77, 891–905, 1996.

Forster, P., Ramaswamy, V., Artaxo, P., Berntsen, T., Betts, R., Fahey, D. W., Haywood, J., Lean, J., Lowe, D. C., Myhre, G., Nganga, J., Prinn, R., Raga, G., Schulz, M., and Dorland, R. V.: Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing, in: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K. B., Tignor, M., and Miller, H. L., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2007.

Gettelman, A., Liu, X., Ghan, S. J., Morrison, H., Park, S., Conley, A. J., Klein, S. A., Boyle, J., Mitchell, D. L., and Li, J. L. F.: Global simulations of ice nucleation and ice supersaturation with an improved cloud scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D18216, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009jd013797doi:10.1029/2009jd013797, 2010.

Ghan, S. J., Easter, R. C., Chapman, E. G., Abdul-Razzak, H., Zhang, Y., Leung, L. R., Laulainen, N. S., Saylor, R. D., and Zaveri, R. A.: A physically based estimate of radiative forcing by anthropogenic sulfate aerosol, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 5279–5293, 2001.

Ghan, S. J. and Zaveri, R. A.: Parameterization of optical properties for hydrated internally mixed aerosol, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D10201, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007927doi:10.1029/2006jd007927, 2007.

Greenwald, T. J., Stephens, G. L., Vonderhaar, T. H., and Jackson, D. L.: A physical retrieval of cloud liquid water over the global oceans using special sensor microwave imager (SSM/I) observations, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 18471–18488, 1993.

Guo, H., Penner, J. E., Herzog, M., and Pawlowska, H.: Examination of the aerosol indirect effect under contrasting environments during the ACE-2 experiment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 535–548, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-535-2007doi:10.5194/acp-7-535-2007, 2007.

Gustafson, W. I., Berg, L. K., Easter, R. C., and Ghan, S. J.: The Explicit-Cloud Parameterized-Pollutant hybrid approach for aerosol-cloud interactions in multiscale modeling framework models: tracer transport results, Environ. Res. Lett., 3, 025005, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/3/2/025005doi:10.1088/1748-9326/3/2/025005, 2008.

Han, Q. Y., Rossow, W. B., and Lacis, A. A.: Near-Global survey of effective droplet radii in liquid water clouds using ISCCP data, J. Climate, 7, 465–497, 1994.

Han, Q. Y., Rossow, W. B., Chou, J., and Welch, R. M.: Global variation of column droplet concentration in low-level clouds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 1419–1422, 1998.

Hansen, J., Sato, M., and Ruedy, R.: Radiative forcing and climate response, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 6831–6864, 1997.

Haywood, J. M., Ramaswamy, V., and Donner, L. J.: A limited-area-model case study of the effects of sub-grid scale variations in relative humidity and cloud upon the direct radiative forcing of sulfate aerosol, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 143–146, 1997.

Heintzenberg, J., Covert, D. C., and Van Dingenen, R.: Size distribution and chemical composition of marine aerosols: a compilation and review, Tellus B, 52, 1104–1122, 2000.

Hoose, C., Kristjansson, J. E., Iversen, T., Kirkevag, A., Seland, O., and Gettelman, A.: Constraining cloud droplet number concentration in GCMs suppresses the aerosol indirect effect, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L12807, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009gl038568doi:10.1029/2009gl038568, 2009.

Hopper, J. F., Worthy, D. E. J., Barrie, L. A., and Trivett, N. B. A.: Atmospheric Observations of Aerosol Black Carbon, Carbon-Dioxide, and Methane in the High Arctic, Atmos. Environ., 28, 3047–3054, 1994.

Horowitz, L. W., Walters, S., Mauzerall, D. L., Emmons, L. K., Rasch, P. J., Granier, C., Tie, X. X., Lamarque, J. F., Schultz, M. G., Tyndall, G. S., Orlando, J. J., and Brasseur, G. P.: A global simulation of tropospheric ozone and related tracers: Description and evaluation of MOZART, version 2, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4784, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002853doi:10.1029/2002jd002853, 2003.

Iacono, M. J., Delamere, J. S., Mlawer, E. J., and Clough, S. A.: Evaluation of upper tropospheric water vapor in the NCAR Community Climate Model (CCM3) using modeled and observed HIRS radiances, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4037, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002539doi:10.1029/2002jd002539, 2003.

Iacono, M. J., Delamere, J. S., Mlawer, E. J., Shephard, M. W., Clough, S. A., and Collins, W. D.: Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D13103, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008jd009944doi:10.1029/2008jd009944, 2008.

IPCC: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K. B., Tignor, M., and Miller, H. L., Cambridge University Press, 996 pp., 2007.

Jiang, H. L., Xue, H. W., Teller, A., Feingold, G., and Levin, Z.: Aerosol effects on the lifetime of shallow cumulus, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L14806, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006gl026024doi:10.1029/2006gl026024, 2006.

Kaufman, Y. J., Koren, I., Remer, L. A., Rosenfeld, D., and Rudich, Y.: The effect of smoke, dust, and pollution aerosol on shallow cloud development over the Atlantic Ocean, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 11207–11212, http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/Pnas.0505191102doi:10.1073/Pnas.0505191102, 2005.

Khairoutdinov, M. and Kogan, Y.: A new cloud physics parameterization in a large-eddy simulation model of marine stratocumulus, Mon. Wea. Rev., 128, 229–243, 2000.

Khairoutdinov, M., Randall, D., and DeMott, C.: Simulations of the atmospheric general circulation using a cloud-resolving model as a superparameterization of physical processes, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 2136–2154, 2005.

Khairoutdinov, M., DeMott, C., and Randall, D.: Evaluation of the simulated interannual and subseasonal variability in an AMIP-Style simulation using the CSU multiscale modeling framework, J. Climate, 21, 413–431, http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2007jcli1630.1doi:10.1175/2007jcli1630.1, 2008.

Khairoutdinov, M. F. and Randall, D. A.: A cloud resolving model as a cloud parameterization in the NCAR Community Climate System Model: Preliminary results, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 3617–3620, 2001.

Khairoutdinov, M. F. and Randall, D. A.: Cloud resolving modeling of the ARM summer 1997 IOP: Model formulation, results, uncertainties, and sensitivities, J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 607–625, 2003.

Kiehl, J. T. and Trenberth, K. E.: Earth's annual global mean energy budget, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 78, 197–208, 1997.

Kinne, S., Schulz, M., Textor, C., Guibert, S., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S. E., Berntsen, T., Berglen, T. F., Boucher, O., Chin, M., Collins, W., Dentener, F., Diehl, T., Easter, R., Feichter, J., Fillmore, D., Ghan, S., Ginoux, P., Gong, S., Grini, A., Hendricks, J. E., Herzog, M., Horowitz, L., Isaksen, L., Iversen, T., Kirkavag, A., Kloster, S., Koch, D., Kristjansson, J. E., Krol, M., Lauer, A., Lamarque, J. F., Lesins, G., Liu, X., Lohmann, U., Montanaro, V., Myhre, G., Penner, J. E., Pitari, G., Reddy, S., Seland, O., Stier, P., Takemura, T., and Tie, X.: An AeroCom initial assessment - optical properties in aerosol component modules of global models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 1815–1834, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1815-2006doi:10.5194/acp-6-1815-2006, 2006.

Lamarque, J. F., Bond, T. C., Eyring, V., Granier, C., Heil, A., Klimont, Z., Lee, D., Liousse, C., Mieville, A., Owen, B., Schultz, M. G., Shindell, D., Smith, S. J., Stehfest, E., Van Aardenne, J., Cooper, O. R., Kainuma, M., Mahowald, N., McConnell, J. R., Naik, V., Riahi, K., and van Vuuren, D. P.: Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of reactive gases and aerosols: methodology and application, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7017–7039, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/Acp-10-7017-2010doi:10.5194/Acp-10-7017-2010, 2010.

Larson, V. E., Wood, R., Field, P. R., Golaz, J. C., Vonder Haar, T. H., and Cotton, W. R.: Systematic biases in the microphysics and thermodynamics of numerical models that ignore subgrid-scale variability, J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 1117–1128, 2001.

Lawson, R. P., Baker, B., Pilson, B., and Mo, Q. X.: In situ observations of the microphysical properties of wave, cirrus, and anvil clouds, Part II: Cirrus clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 3186–3203, 2006.

Liu, X. H., Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., Zaveri, R., Rasch, P., Shi, X., Lamarque, J.-F., Gettelman, A., Morrison, H., Vitt, F., Conley, A., Park, S., Neale, R., Hannay, C., Ekman, A., Hess, P., Mahowald, N., Collins, W., Iacon, M., Bretherton, C., and Flanner, M.: Toward a Minimal Representation of Aerosol Direct and Indirect Effects, J. Climate, to be submitted, 2011.

Loeb, N. G., Wielicki, B. A., Doelling, D. R., Smith, G. L., Keyes, D. F., Kato, S., Manalo-Smith, N., and Wong, T.: Toward Optimal Closure of the Earth's Top-of-Atmosphere Radiation Budget, J. Climate, 22, 748–766, http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2008jcli2637.1doi:10.1175/2008jcli2637.1, 2009.

Lohmann, U.: Global anthropogenic aerosol effects on convective clouds in ECHAM5-HAM, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2115–2131, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2115-2008doi:10.5194/acp-8-2115-2008, 2008.

Lohmann, U., Spichtinger, P., Jess, S., Peter, T., and Smit, H.: Cirrus cloud formation and ice supersaturated regions in a global climate model, Environ. Res. Lett., 3, 045022, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/045022doi:10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/045022, 2008.

Lohmann, U., Rotstayn, L., Storelvmo, T., Jones, A., Menon, S., Quaas, J., Ekman, A. M. L., Koch, D., and Ruedy, R.: Total aerosol effect: radiative forcing or radiative flux perturbation?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3235–3246, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3235-2010doi:10.5194/acp-10-3235-2010, 2010.

Mahowald, N. M., Muhs, D. R., Levis, S., Rasch, P. J., Yoshioka, M., Zender, C. S., and Luo, C.: Change in atmospheric mineral aerosols in response to climate: Last glacial period, preindustrial, modern, and doubled carbon dioxide climates, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D10202, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006653doi:10.1029/2005jd006653, 2006a.

Mahowald, N. M., Yoshioka, M., Collins, W. D., Conley, A. J., Fillmore, D. W., and Coleman, D. B.: Climate response and radiative forcing from mineral aerosols during the last glacial maximum, pre-industrial, current and doubled-carbon dioxide climates, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L20705, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006gl026126doi:10.1029/2006gl026126, 2006b.

Marchand, R. and Ackerman, T.: An analysis of cloud cover in multiscale modeling framework global climate model simulations using 4 and 1 km horizontal grids, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D16207, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009jd013423doi:10.1029/2009jd013423, 2010.

Martensson, E. M., Nilsson, E. D., de Leeuw, G., Cohen, L. H., and Hansson, H. C.: Laboratory simulations and parameterization of the primary marine aerosol production, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4297, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002263doi:10.1029/2002jd002263, 2003.

Matsui, T., Masunaga, H., Kreidenweis, S. M., Pielke, R. A., Tao, W. K., Chin, M., and Kaufman, Y. J.: Satellite-based assessment of marine low cloud variability associated with aerosol, atmospheric stability, and the diurnal cycle, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D17204, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006097doi:10.1029/2005jd006097, 2006.

McComiskey, A., Feingold, G., Frisch, A. S., Turner, D. D., Miller, M. A., Chiu, J. C., Min, Q. L., and Ogren, J. A.: An assessment of aerosol-cloud interactions in marine stratus clouds based on surface remote sensing, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D09203, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008jd011006doi:10.1029/2008jd011006, 2009.

Menon, S. and Rotstayn, L.: The radiative influence of aerosol effects on liquid-phase cumulus and stratiform clouds based on sensitivity studies with two climate models, Climate Dyn., 27, 345–356, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/S00382-006-0139-3doi:10.1007/S00382-006-0139-3, 2006.

Mlawer, E. J., Taubman, S. J., Brown, P. D., Iacono, M. J., and Clough, S. A.: Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 16663–16682, 1997.

Morrison, H., Curry, J. A., and Khvorostyanov, V. I.: A new double-moment microphysics parameterization for application in cloud and climate models. Part I: Description, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 1665–1677, 2005.

Morrison, H. and Pinto, J. O.: Mesoscale modeling of springtime Arctic mixed-phase stratiform clouds using a new two-moment bulk microphysics scheme, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 3683–3704, 2005.

Morrison, H. and Gettelman, A.: A new two-moment bulk stratiform cloud microphysics scheme in the community atmosphere model, version 3 (CAM3). Part I: Description and numerical tests, J. Climate, 21, 3642–3659, http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2008jcli2105.1doi:10.1175/2008jcli2105.1, 2008.

Morrison, H., Thompson, G., and Tatarskii, V.: Impact of Cloud Microphysics on the Development of Trailing Stratiform Precipitation in a Simulated Squall Line: Comparison of One- and Two-Moment Schemes, Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 991–1007, http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2008mwr2556.1doi:10.1175/2008mwr2556.1, 2009.

Murphy, D. M., Solomon, S., Portmann, R. W., Rosenlof, K. H., Forster, P. M., and Wong, T.: An observationally based energy balance for the Earth since 1950, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D17107, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009jd012105doi:10.1029/2009jd012105, 2009.

Nakajima, T., Higurashi, A., Kawamoto, K., and Penner, J. E.: A possible correlation between satellite-derived cloud and aerosol microphysical parameters, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 1171–1174, 2001.

Pincus, R. and Klein, S. A.: Unresolved spatial variability and microphysical process rates in large-scale models, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 27059–27065, 2000.

Platnick, S., Durkee, P. A., Nielsen, K., Taylor, J. P., Tsay, S. C., King, M. D., Ferek, R. J., Hobbs, P. V., and Rottman, J. W.: The role of background cloud microphysics in the radiative formation of ship tracks, J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 2607–2624, 2000.

Platnick, S., King, M. D., Ackerman, S. A., Menzel, W. P., Baum, B. A., Riedi, J. C., and Frey, R. A.: The MODIS cloud products: Algorithms and examples from Terra, Ieee Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 41, 459–473, 2003.

Prospero, J. M., Uematsu, M., and Savoie, D. L.: Mineral aerosol transport to the Pacific Ocean, in: Chemical Oceanography, edited by: Ridley, J. P., Chester, R., and Duce, R. A., Elsevier, New York, 188–218, 1989.

Quaas, J., Boucher, O., and Lohmann, U.: Constraining the total aerosol indirect effect in the LMDZ and ECHAM4 GCMs using MODIS satellite data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 947–955, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-947-2006doi:10.5194/acp-6-947-2006, 2006.

Quaas, J., Ming, Y., Menon, S., Takemura, T., Wang, M., Penner, J. E., Gettelman, A., Lohmann, U., Bellouin, N., Boucher, O., Sayer, A. M., Thomas, G. E., McComiskey, A., Feingold, G., Hoose, C., Kristjánsson, J. E., Liu, X., Balkanski, Y., Donner, L. J., Ginoux, P. A., Stier, P., Grandey, B., Feichter, J., Sednev, I., Bauer, S. E., Koch, D., Grainger, R. G., Kirkevåg, A., Iversen, T., Seland, Ø., Easter, R., Ghan, S. J., Rasch, P. J., Morrison, H., Lamarque, J.-F., Iacono, M. J., Kinne, S., and Schulz, M.: Aerosol indirect effects – general circulation model intercomparison and evaluation with satellite data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8697–8717, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8697-2009doi:10.5194/acp-9-8697-2009, 2009.

Quaas, J., Stevens, B., Stier, P., and Lohmann, U.: Interpreting the cloud cover – aerosol optical depth relationship found in satellite data using a general circulation model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6129–6135, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6129-2010doi:10.5194/acp-10-6129-2010, 2010.

Randall, D., Khairoutdinov, M., Arakawa, A., and Grabowski, W.: Breaking the cloud parameterization deadlock, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 84, 1547, http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/Bams-84-11-1547doi:10.1175/Bams-84-11-1547, 2003.

Rosenfeld, D., Kaufman, Y. J., and Koren, I.: Switching cloud cover and dynamical regimes from open to closed Benard cells in response to the suppression of precipitation by aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 2503–2511, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-2503-2006doi:10.5194/acp-6-2503-2006, 2006.

Rossow, W. B. and Schiffer, R. A.: Advances in understanding clouds from ISCCP, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 80, 2261–2287, 1999.

Rotstayn, L. D.: On the "tuning" of autoconversion parameterizations in climate models, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 15495–15507, 2000.

Savoie, D. I., Prospero, J. M., Larsen, R. J., Huang, F., Izaguirre, M. A., Huang, T., Snowdon, T. H., Custals, L., and Sanderson, C. G.: Nitrogen and Sulfur Species in Antarctic Aerosols at Mawson, Palmer Station, and Marsh (King George Island), J. Atmos. Chem., 17, 95–122, 1993.

Savoie, D. L., Prospero, J. M., and Saltzman, E. S.: Nitrate, nonseasalt sulfate and methanesulfonate over the Pacific Ocean, in: Chemical Oceanography, edited by: Ridley, J. P., Chester, R., and Duce, R. A., Elsevier, New York, 219–250, 1989.

Small, J. D., Chuang, P. Y., Feingold, G., and Jiang, H. L.: Can aerosol decrease cloud lifetime?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L16806, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009gl038888doi:10.1029/2009gl038888, 2009.

Stevens, B. and Feingold, G.: Untangling aerosol effects on clouds and precipitation in a buffered system, Nature, 461, 607–613, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/Nature08281doi:10.1038/Nature08281, 2009.

Suzuki, K., Nakajima, T., Numaguti, A., Takemura, T., Kawamoto, K., and Higurashi, A.: A study of the aerosol effect on a cloud field with simultaneous use of GCM modeling and satellite observation, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 179–194, 2004.

Suzuki, K., Nakajima, T., Satoh, M., Tomita, H., Takemura, T., Nakajima, T. Y., and Stephens, G. L.: Global cloud-system-resolving simulation of aerosol effect on warm clouds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L19817, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008gl035449doi:10.1029/2008gl035449, 2008.

Tao, W. K., Chern, J. D., Atlas, R., Randall, D., Khairoutdinov, M., Li, J. L., Waliser, D. E., Hou, A., Lin, X., Peters-Lidard, C., Lau, W., Jiang, J., and Simpson, J.: A Multiscale Modeling System Developments, Applications, and Critical Issues, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 90, 515, http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2008bams2542.1doi:10.1175/2008bams2542.1, 2009.

Tao, W. K., Simpson, J., Baker, D., Braun, S., Chou, M. D., Ferrier, B., Johnson, D., Khain, A., Lang, S., Lynn, B., Shie, C. L., Starr, D., Sui, C. H., Wang, Y., and Wetzel, P.: Microphysics, radiation and surface processes in the Goddard Cumulus Ensemble (GCE) model, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 82, 97–137, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/S00703-001-0594-7doi:10.1007/S00703-001-0594-7, 2003.

Thompson, G., Rasmussen, R. M., and Manning, K.: Explicit forecasts of winter precipitation using an improved bulk microphysics scheme. Part I: Description and sensitivity analysis, Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 519–542, 2004.

Waliser, D. E., Li, J. L. F., Woods, C. P., Austin, R. T., Bacmeister, J., Chern, J., Del Genio, A., Jiang, J. H., Kuang, Z. M., Meng, H., Minnis, P., Platnick, S., Rossow, W. B., Stephens, G. L., Sun-Mack, S., Tao, W. K., Tompkins, A. M., Vane, D. G., Walker, C., and Wu, D.: Cloud ice: A climate model challenge with signs and expectations of progress, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D00A21, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010015doi:10.1029/2008JD010015, 2009.

Wang, M. and Penner, J. E.: Aerosol indirect forcing in a global model with particle nucleation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 239–260, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-239-2009doi:10.5194/acp-9-239-2009, 2009.

Wang, M. and Penner, J. E.: Cirrus clouds in a global climate model with a statistical cirrus cloud scheme, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5449–5474, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/Acp-10-5449-2010doi:10.5194/Acp-10-5449-2010, 2010.

Wang, M., Ghan, S., Easter, R., Ovchinnikov, M., Liu, X., Kassianov, E., Qian, Y., Gustafson, W., Larson, V. E., Schanen, D. P., Khairoutdinov, M., and Morrison, H.: The multi-scale aerosol-climate model PNNL-MMF: model description and evaluation, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 137–168, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-137-2011doi:10.5194/gmd-4-137-2011, 2011.

Weng, F. Z. and Grody, N. C.: Retrieval of cloud liquid water using the Special Sensor Microwave Imager (SSM/I), J. Geophys. Res., 99, 25535–25551, 1994.

Wolff, E. W. and Cachier, H.: Concentrations and seasonal cycle of black carbon in aerosol at a coastal Antarctic station, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 11033–11041, 1998.

Wood, R., Bretherton, C. S., Leon, D., Clarke, A. D., Zuidema, P., Allen, G., and Coe, H.: An aircraft case study of the spatial transition from closed to open mesoscale cellular convection over the Southeast Pacific, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 2341–2370, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/Acp-11-2341-2011doi:10.5194/Acp-11-2341-2011, 2011.

Wylie, D., Jackson, D. L., Menzel, W. P., and Bates, J. J.: Trends in global cloud cover in two decades of HIRS observations, J. Climate, 18, 3021–3031, 2005.

Xue, H. W., Feingold, G., and Stevens, B.: Aerosol effects on clouds, precipitation, and the organization of shallow cumulus convection, J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 392–406, http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2007jas2428.1doi:10.1175/2007jas2428.1, 2008.

Yoshioka, M., Mahowald, N. M., Conley, A. J., Collins, W. D., Fillmore, D. W., Zender, C. S., and Coleman, D. B.: Impact of desert dust radiative forcing on Sahel precipitation: Relative importance of dust compared to sea surface temperature variations, vegetation changes, and greenhouse gas warming, J. Climate, 20, 1445–1467, http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/Jcli4056.1doi:10.1175/Jcli4056.1, 2007.

Zender, C. S., Bian, H. S., and Newman, D.: Mineral Dust Entrainment and Deposition (DEAD) model: Description and 1990s dust climatology, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4416, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002775doi:10.1029/2002jd002775, 2003.

Zhang, J. H., Lohmann, U., and Stier, P.: A microphysical parameterization for convective clouds in the ECHAM5 climate model: Single-column model results evaluated at the Oklahoma Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program site, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D15S07, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005128doi:10.1029/2004jd005128, 2005.