References

ACP

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

ACP

1680-7324

Copernicus GmbH

Göttingen, Germany

10.5194/acp-11-1457-2011

Emulating atmosphere-ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6 – Part 2: Applications

Meinshausen

¹ Wigley

T. M. L.

² Raper

S. C. B.

Earth System Analysis, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Potsdam, Germany

National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), Boulder, CO, USA

Manchester Metropolitan University (MMU), Manchester, UK

16 02 2011

11 4 1457 1471

This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/1457/2011/acp-11-1457-2011.html

The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/1457/2011/acp-11-1457-2011.pdf

Intercomparisons of coupled atmosphere-ocean general circulation models (AOGCMs) and carbon cycle models are important for galvanizing our current scientific knowledge to project future climate. Interpreting such intercomparisons faces major challenges, not least because different models have been forced with different sets of forcing agents. Here, we show how an emulation approach with MAGICC6 can address such problems. In a companion paper (Meinshausen et al., 2011a), we show how the lower complexity carbon cycle-climate model MAGICC6 can be calibrated to emulate, with considerable accuracy, globally aggregated characteristics of these more complex models. Building on that, we examine here the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project's Phase 3 results (CMIP3). If forcing agents missed by individual AOGCMs in CMIP3 are considered, this reduces ensemble average temperature change from pre-industrial times to 2100 under SRES A1B by 0.4 °C. Differences in the results from the 1980 to 1999 base period (as reported in IPCC AR4) to 2100 are negligible, however, although there are some differences in the trajectories over the 21st century. In a second part of this study, we consider the new RCP scenarios that are to be investigated under the forthcoming CMIP5 intercomparison for the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report. For the highest scenario, RCP8.5, relative to pre-industrial levels, we project a median warming of around 4.6 °C by 2100 and more than 7 °C by 2300. For the lowest RCP scenario, RCP3-PD, the corresponding warming is around 1.5 °C by 2100, decreasing to around 1.1 °C by 2300 based on our AOGCM and carbon cycle model emulations. Implied cumulative CO2 emissions over the 21st century for RCP8.5 and RCP3-PD are 1881 GtC (1697 to 2034 GtC, 80% uncertainty range) and 381 GtC (334 to 488 GtC), when prescribing CO2 concentrations and accounting for uncertainty in the carbon cycle. Lastly, we assess the reasons why a previous MAGICC version (4.2) used in IPCC AR4 gave roughly 10% larger warmings over the 21st century compared to the CMIP3 average. We find that forcing differences and the use of slightly too high climate sensitivities inferred from idealized high-forcing runs were the major reasons for this difference.

References 1

Brohan, P., Kennedy, J J., Harris, I., Tett, S. F B., and Jones, P D.: Uncertainty estimates in regional and global observed temperature changes: A new data set from 1850, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D12106, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006548doi:10.1029/2005JD006548, 2006.

Bryan, K.: A numerical method for the study of the circulation of the world ocean, J. Comput. Phys., 4, 347–376, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(69)90004-7doi:10.1016/0021-9991(69)90004-7, 1969.

Clarke, L., Edmonds, J., Jacoby, H., Pitcher, H., Reilly, J., and Richels, R.: Scenarios of Greenhous Gas Emissions and Atmospheric Concentrations – US Climate Change Science Program Synthesis and Assessment Product 2.1a, Tech. rep., US Department of Energy, 2007.

Clarke, L., Edmonds, J., Krey, V., Richels, R., Rose, S., and Tavoni, M.: International climate policy architectures: Overview of the EMF 22 International Scenarios, Energy Economics, 31, S64–S81, 2009.

Collins, W D., Ramaswamy, V., Schwarzkopf, M D., Sun, Y., Portmann, R W., Fu, Q., Casanova, S. E B., Dufresne, J L., Fillmore, D W., Forster, P. M D., Galin, V Y., Gohar, L K., Ingram, W J., Kratz, D P., Lefebvre, M P., Li, J., Marquet, P., Oinas, V., Tsushima, Y., Uchiyama, T., and Zhong, W Y.: Radiative forcing by well-mixed greenhouse gases: Estimates from climate models in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report (AR4), J. Geophys. Res., 111, D14317, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006713doi:10.1029/2005JD006713, 2006.

Forster, P., Ramaswamy, V., Artaxo, P., Berntsen, T., Betts, R., Fahey, D., Haywood, J., Lean, J., Lowe, D., Myhre, G., Nganga, J., Prinn, R., Raga, G., Schulz, M., and Van~Dorland, R.: Chapter 2: Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing, in: IPCC Fourth Assessment Report WG 1, edited by: Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K B., Tignor, M., and Miller, H L., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 129–234, 2007.

Forster, P. M D. and Taylor, K E.: Climate forcings and climate sensitivities diagnosed from coupled climate model integrations, J. Climate, 19, 6181–6194, 2006.

Fujino, J., Nair, R., Kainuma, M., Masui, T., and Matsuoka, Y.: Multi-gas mitigation analysis on stabilization scenarios using AIM global model, Energy J., 343–353, 2006.

Gregory, J M.: Long-term effect of volcanic forcing on ocean heat content, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L22701, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045507 doi:10.1029/2010GL045507, 2010.

Hegerl, G C., Zwiers, F W., Braconnot, P., Gillett, N., Luo, Y., Marengo~Orsini, J A., Nicholls, N., Penner, J E., and Stott, P A.: Understanding and Attributing Climate Change, in: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K., Tignor, M., and Miller, H., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 2007.

Houghton, R A. and Hackler, J L.: Carbon Flux to the Atmosphere from Land-Use Changes, In Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change, 2002.

Hurtt, G., Chini, L., Frolking, S., Betts, R., Edmonds, J., Feddema, J., Fisher, G., Goldewijk, K., Hibbard, K., Houghton, R., Janetos, A., Jones, C., Kinderman, G., Konoshita, T., Riahi, K., Shevliakova, E., Smith, S., Stehfest, E., Thomson, A., Thornton, P., van Vuuren, D., and Wang, Y.: Land Use Change and Earth System Dynamics, Clim. Change, submitted, 2011.

Knutti, R.: The end of model democracy?, Clim. Change, 2010.

Knutti, R., Allen, M R., Friedlingstein, P., Gregory, J M., Hegerl, G C., Meehl, G A., Meinshausen, M., Murphy, J M., Plattner, G.-K., Raper, S. C B., Stocker, T F., Stott, P A., Teng, H., and Wigley, T. M L.: A review of uncertainties in global temperature projections over the twenty-first century, J. Climate, 21, 2651–2663, 2008.

Lamarque, J.-F., Kyle, G P., Meinshausen, M., Riahi, K., Steven, J S., van Vuuren, D P., Conley, A J., and Vitt, F.: Global and regional evolution of short-lived radiatively-active gases and aerosols in the Representative Concentration Pathways, Clim. Change, accepted.

Lean, J L. and Rind, D H.: How will Earth's surface temperature change in future decades?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L15708, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038932doi:10.1029/2009GL038932, 2009.

Lowe, J A., Huntingford, C., Raper, S. C B., Jones, C D., Lidicoat, S K., and Gohar, L K.: How difficult is it to recover from dangerous levels of global warming?, Environ. Res. Lett., 4, 014012, 1–9, 2009.

Marland, G., Boden, T A., and Andres, R J.: Global, Regional, and National Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions, In Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change, 2006.

Matthews, H D. and Caldeira, K.: Stabilizing climate requires near-zero emissions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L04705, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032388doi:10.1029/2007GL032388, 2008.

Meehl, G A., Covey, C., McAvaney, B., Latif, M., and Stouffer, R J.: Overview of coupled model intercomparison project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 86, 89–93, 2005a.

Meehl, G A., Washington, W M., Collins, W D., Arblaster, J M., Hu, A X., Buja, L E., Strand, W G., and Teng, H Y.: How much more global warming and sea level rise?, Science, 307, 1769–1772, 2005b.

Meehl, G A., Stocker, T F., Collins, W., Friedlingstein, P., Gaye, A., Gregory, J M., Kitoh, A., Knutti, R., Murphy, J., Noda, A., Raper, S. C B., Watterson, I., Weaver, A., and Zhao, Z.-C.: Chapter 10: Global Climate Projections, in: IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, edited by: Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K B., Tignor, M., and Miller, H L., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 747–845, 2007.

Meinshausen, M., Raper, S. C B., and Wigley, T. M L.: Emulating coupled atmosphere-ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6: Part I – Model Description and Calibration, Atmos. Chem. Phys., \blackbox\bf This is companion paper Part I, please update ref., 2011a.

Meinshausen, M., Smith, S., Calvin, K., Daniel, J S., Kainuma, M. L T., Lamarque, J.-F., Matsumoto, K., Montzka, S A., Raper, S. C B., Riahi, K., Thomson, A M., Velders, G. J M., and van Vuuren, D.: The RCP Greenhouse Gas Concentrations and their Extension from 1765 to 2300, Clim. Change, submitted, 2011b.

Moss, R H., Edmonds, J A., Hibbard, K A., Manning, M R., Rose, S K., van Vuuren, D P., Carter, T R., Emori, S., Kainuma, M., Kram, T., Meehl, G A., Mitchell, J. F B., Nakicenovic, N., Riahi, K., Smith, S J., Stouffer, R J., Thomson, A M., Weyant, J P., and Wilbanks, T J.: The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment, Nature, 463, 747–756, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08823doi:10.1038/nature08823, 2010.

Myhre, G., Highwood, E J., Shine, K P., and Stordal, F.: New estimates of radiative forcing due to well mixed greenhouse gases, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 2715–2718, 1998.

Orr, J.: Global Ocean Storage of Anthropogenic Carbon (GOSAC). EurOCMIP-2 Final Report, Tech. rep., IPSL/CNRS, 2002.

Riahi, K., Gruebler, A., and Nakicenovic, N.: Scenarios of long-term socio-economic and environmental development under climate stabilization., Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 74, 887–935, 2007.

Santer, B D., Taylor, K E., Gleckler, P J., Bonfils, C., Barnett, T P., Pierce, D W., Wigley, T. M L., Mears, C., Wentz, F J., Bruggemann, W., Gillett, N P., Klein, S A., Solomon, S., Stott, P A., and Wehner, M F.: Incorporating model quality information in climate change detection and attribution studies, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 106, 14778–14783, 2009.

Schewe, J., Levermann, A., and Meinshausen, M.: Climate change under a scenario near 1.5°C of global warming: Monsoon intensification, ocean warming and steric sea level rise, Earth Syst. Dynam. Disc., 1, 297-324, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/esdd-1-297-2010doi:10.5194/esdd-1-297-2010 , 2010.

Stott, P A., Tett, S. F B., Jones, G S., Allen, M R., Mitchell, J. F B., and Jenkins, G J.: External Control of 20th Century Temperature by Natural and Anthropogenic Forcings, Science, 290, 2133–2137, 2000.

Taylor, K., Stouffer, R J., and Meehl, G A.: A summary of the CMIP5 Experiment Design, http://cmip-pcmdi.llnl.gov/cmip5/docs/Taylor_CMIP5_design.pdf, 2009.

Tebaldi, C. and Knutti, R.: The use of the multi-model ensemble in probabilistic climate projections, Philosoph. Trans. Roy. Soc. a-Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 365, 2053–2075, 2007.

van Vuuren, D., den Elzen, M., Lucas, P., Eickhout, B., Strengers, B., van Ruijven, B., Wonink, S., and van Houdt, R.: Stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations at low levels: an assessment of reduction strategies and costs, Clim. Change, 81, 119–159, 2007.

Wigley, T. M L.: The climate change commitment, Science, 307, 1766–1769, 2005.

Wigley, T. M L., Clarke, L E., Edmonds, J A., Jacoby, H D., Paltsev, S., Pitcher, H., Reilly, J M., Richels, R., Sarofim, M C., and Smith, S J.: Uncertainties in climate stabilization, Clim. Change, 97, 85–121, 2009.