ACP Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics ACP 1680-7324 Copernicus GmbH Göttingen, Germany 10.5194/acp-11-13029-2011 Trends of solar ultraviolet irradiance at Barrow, Alaska, and the effect of measurement uncertainties on trend detection Bernhard G. 1 Biospherical Instruments, San Diego, California, USA 21 12 2011 11 24 13029 13045 This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/13029/2011/acp-11-13029-2011.html The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/13029/2011/acp-11-13029-2011.pdf

Spectral ultraviolet (UV) irradiance has been observed near Barrow, Alaska (71° N, 157° W) between 1991 and 2011 with an SUV-100 spectroradiometer. The instrument was historically part of the US National Science Foundation's UV Monitoring Network and is now a component of NSF's Arctic Observing Network. From these measurements, trends in monthly average irradiance and their uncertainties were calculated. The analysis focuses on two quantities, the UV Index (which is affected by atmospheric ozone concentrations) and irradiance at 345 nm (which is virtually insensitive to ozone). Uncertainties of trend estimates depend on variations in the data due to (1) natural variability, (2) systematic and random errors of the measurements, and (3) uncertainties caused by gaps in the time series. Using radiative transfer model calculations, systematic errors of the measurements were detected and corrected. Different correction schemes were tested to quantify the sensitivity of the trend estimates on the treatment of systematic errors. Depending on the correction method, estimates of decadal trends changed between 1.5% and 2.9%. Uncertainties in the trend estimates caused by error sources (2) and (3) were set into relation with the overall uncertainty of the trend determinations. Results show that these error sources are only relevant for February, March, and April when natural variability is low due to high surface albedo. This method of addressing measurement uncertainties in time series analysis is also applicable to other geophysical parameters. Trend estimates varied between −14% and +5% per decade and were significant (95.45% confidence level) only for the month of October. Depending on the correction method, October trends varied between −11.4% and −13.7% for irradiance at 345 nm and between −11.7% and −14.1% for the UV Index. These large trends are consistent with trends in short-wave (0.3–3.0 μm) solar irradiance measured with pyranometers at NOAA's Barrow Observatory and can be explained by a change in snow cover over the observation period: analysis of pyranometer data indicates that the first day of fall when albedo becomes larger than 0.6 after snow fall, and remains above 0.6 for the rest of the winter, has advanced with a statistically significant trend of 13.6 ± 9.7 days per decade.

 References % vor jede Referenz ACIA: Arctic Climate Impact Assessment, 1042 pp., Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2005. Bernhard, G., Booth, C. R., and McPeters, R. D.: Calculation of total column ozone from global UV spectra at high latitudes, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4532, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003450doi:10.1029/2003JD003450, 2003. Bernhard, G., Booth, C. R., and Ehramjian, J. C.: Version 2 data of the National Science Foundation's Ultraviolet Radiation Monitoring Network: South Pole, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D21207, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004937doi:10.1029/2004JD004937, 2004. Bernhard, G., Booth, C. R., Ehramjian, J. C., Stone, R., and Dutton, E. G.: Ultraviolet and visible radiation at Barrow, Alaska: Climatology and influencing factors on the basis of version 2 National Science Foundation network data, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D09101, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007865doi:10.1029/2006JD007865, 2007. Bernhard, G., Booth, C. R., and Ehramjian, J. C.: Comparison of UV irradiance measurements at Summit, Greenland; Barrow, Alaska; and South Pole, Antarctica, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 4799–4810, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4799-2008doi:10.5194/acp-8-4799-2008, 2008. Booth, C. R. and Madronich S.: Radiation amplification factors: Improved formulation accounts for large increases in ultraviolet radiation associated with Antarctic ozone depletion, in: Ultraviolet Radiation in Antarctica: Measurement and Biological Effects, edited by: Weiler, C. S. and Penhale, P. S., AGU Antarct. Res. Ser., 62, 39–52, 1994. Blumthaler, M. and Ambach, W.: Solar UVB-albedo of various surfaces, Photochem. Photobiol., 48, 85–88, 1988. Comiso J. C., Parkinson C. L., Gersten R., and Stock, L.: Accelerated decline in the Arctic sea ice cover, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L01703, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031972doi:10.1029/2007GL031972, 2008. Draper, N. R. and Smith, H.: Applied regression analysis, 3$^rd $edition, 706 pp., John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, ISBN 0-471-17082-8, 1998. Dutton, E. G., Farhadi, A., Stone, R. S., Long, C. N., and Nelson, D. W.: Long-term variations in the occurrence and effective solar transmission of clouds as determined from surface-based total irradiance observations, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D03204, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003568doi:10.1029/2003JD003568, 2004. Dutton, E. G., Nelson, D. W., Stone, R. S., Longenecker, D., Carbaugh, G., Harris, J. M., and Wendell, J.: Decadal variations in surface solar irradiance as observed in a globally remote network, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D19101, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006901doi:10.1029/2005JD006901, 2006. Gehrke, C., Johanson, U., Callaghan, T. V., Chadwick, D., and Robinson, C. H.: The impact of enhanced ultraviolet-B radiation on litter quality and decomposition processes in Vaccinium leaves from the Subarctic, Oikos, 72, 213–222, 1995. Gwynn-Jones, D.: Enhanced UV-B radiation and herbivory, in: animal responses to global change in the North, edited by: Hofgaard, A., Ball, J. P., Danell, K., and Callaghan, T. V., Ecol. Bull., 47, 77–83, 1999. Gurney, K. R.: Evidence for increasing ultraviolet irradiance at Point Barrow, Alaska, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 903–906, 1998. Hessen, D. O. (Ed.): UV Radiation and Arctic Ecosystems, 321 pp., Springer-Verlag, New York, 2001. Hicke, J. A., Slusser, J., Lantz, K., and Pascual, F. G.: Trends and interannual variability in surface UVB radiation over 8 to 11 years observed across the United States, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D21302, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009826doi:10.1029/2008JD009826, 2008. Holick, M. F.: Vitamin D deficiency, New. Engl. J. Med., 357, 266–281, 2007. International Standards Organization (ISO): Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, 101 pp., ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 1993. Krotkov, N., Bhartia, P., Herman, J., Fioletov, V., and Kerr, J.: Satellite estimation of spectral surface UV irradiance in the presence of tropospheric aerosols 1. Cloud-free case, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 8779–8793, 1998. Krotkov, N., Herman, J., Bhartia, P., Fioletov, V., and Ahmad, Z.: Satellite estimation of spectral surface UV irradiance 2. Effects of homogeneous clouds and snow, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 11743–11759, 2001. Krzy\'scin, J. W., Sobolewski, P. S., Jarosławski, J., Podgórski, J., and Rajewska-Wi\cech, B.: Erythemal UV observations at Belsk, Poland, in the period 1976–2008: data homogenization, climatology, and trends, Acta Geophys., 59, 155–182, http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/s11600-010-0036-3doi:10.2478/s11600-010-0036-3, 2011. Lenoble, J., Kylling, A., and Smolskaia, I.: Impact of snow cover and topography on ultraviolet irradiance at the alpine station of Briançon, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D16209, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004523doi:10.1029/2004JD004523, 2004. Lindfors, A. V., Arola, A., Kaurola, J., Taalas, P., and Svenøe, T.: Long-term erythemal UV doses at Sodankylä estimated using total ozone, sunshine duration, and snow depth, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4518, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003325doi:10.1029/2002JD003325, 2003. Mayer, B. and Kylling, A.: Technical note: The libRadtran software package for radiative transfer calculations – description and examples of use, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1855–1877, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1855-2005doi:10.5194/acp-5-1855-2005, 2005. Maykut G. A. and Church, P. E.: Radiation climate at Barrow, Alaska, 1962–66, J. Appl. Meteorol., 12, 620–628, 1973. McKinlay, A. F. and Diffey, B. L. (Eds.): A reference action spectrum for ultraviolet induced erythema in human skin, CIE J., 6, 17–22, 1987. Meehl, G. A., Stocker, T. F., Collins, W. D., Friedlingstein, P., Gaye, A. T., Gregory, J. M., Kitoh, A., Knutti, R., Murphy, J. M., Noda, A., Raper, S. C. B., Watterson, I. G., Weaver, A. J., and Zhao, Z.-C.: Global Climate Projections, in: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K. B., Tignor, M., and Miller, H. L., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2007. Micheletti, M. I., Piacentini, R. D., and Madronich, S.: Sensitivity of biologically active UV radiation to stratospheric ozone changes: effects of action spectrum shape and wavelength range, Photochem. Photobiol., 78, 456–461, http://dx.doi.org/10.1562/0031-8655(2003)0780456SOBAUR2.0.CO2doi:10.1562/0031-8655(2003)0780456SOBAUR2.0.CO2, 2003. Moody, S. A., Newsham, K. K., Ayres, P. G., and Paul, N. D.: Variation in the responses of litter and phylloplane fungi to UV-B radiation (290–315 nm), Mycol. Res., 103, 1469–1477, 1999. Manney, G. L., Santee, M. L., Rex., M., Livesey, N. J., Pitts, M. C., Veefkind, P., Nash, E. R., Wohltmann, I., Lehmann, R., Froidevaux, L., Poole, L. R., Schoeberl, M. R., Haffner, D. P., Davies, J., Dorokhov, V., Gernandt, H., Johnson, B., Kivi, R., Kyrö, E., Larsen, N., Levelt, P. F., Makshtas, A., McElroy, C. T., Nakajima, H., Parrondo, M. C. Tarasick, D. W., von der Gathen, P., Walker, K. A., and Zinoviev, N. S.: Unprecedented Arctic ozone loss in 2011 echoed the Antarctic ozone hole, Nature, 478, 469–475, 2011. Nichol, S. E., Pfister, G., Bodeker, G. E., McKenzie, R. L., Wood, S. W., and Bernhard, G.: Moderation of cloud reduction of UV in the Antarctic due to high surface albedo, J. Appl. Meteorol., 42, 1174–1183, 2003. Press, W. H., Flannery, B. P., Teukolsky, S. A., and Vetterling, W. T.: Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing, 818 pp., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, ISBN 0-521-30811-9, 1986. Rex, M., Salawitch, R. J., Deckelmann, H., von der Gathen, P., Harris, N. R. P., Chipperfield, M. P., Naujokat, B., Reimer, E., Allaart, M., Andersen, S. B., Bevilacqua, R., Braathen, G. O., Claude, H., Davies, J., De Backer, H., Dier, H., Dorokhov, V., Fast, H., Gerding, M., Godin-Beekmann, S., Hoppel, K., Johnson, B., Kyrö, E., Litynska, Z., Moore, D., Nakane, H., Parrondo, M. C., Risley Jr., A. D., Skrivankova, P., Stübi, R., Viatte, P., Yushkov, V., and Zerefos, C.: Arctic winter 2005: Implications for stratospheric ozone loss and climate change, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L23808, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026731doi:10.1029/2006GL026731, 2006. Ricchiazzi, P., Gautier, C., and Lubin, D.: Cloud scattering optical depth and local surface albedo in the Antarctic: simultaneous retrieval using ground-based radiometry, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 21091–21104, 1995. Serreze, M. C., Holland, M. M., and Stroeve, J.: Perspectives on the Arctic's shrinking sea-ice cover, Science, 315, 1533–1536, http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1139426doi:10.1126/science.1139426, 2007. Stephens, M. A.:, EDF Statistics for Goodness of Fit and Some Comparisons, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 69, 730–737, 1974. Stone, R. S., Dutton, E. G., Harris, J. M., and Longenecker D.: Earlier spring snowmelt in northern Alaska as an indicator of climate change, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4089, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000286doi:10.1029/2000JD000286, 2002. Stone, R., Douglas, D., Belchansky, G., and Drobot, S.: Correlated declines in Pacific Arctic snow and sea ice cover, Arctic Research of the United States, 19, 18–25, 2005. Tanskanen, A., Lindfors, A., Määttä, A., Krotkov, N., Herman, J., Kaurola, J., Koskela, T., Lakkala, K., Fioletov, V., Bernhard, G., McKenzie, R., Kondo, Y., O'Neill, M., Slaper, H., den Outer, P., Bais, A. F., and Tamminen., J.: Validation of daily erythemal doses from Ozone Monitoring Instrument with ground-based UV measurement data, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D24S44, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008830doi:10.1029/2007JD008830, 2007. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP): Environmental effects of ozone depletion and its interactions with climate change: 2010 assessment, 236 pp., UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya, ISBN: ISBN 92-807-2312-X, 2010. Weatherhead, E. C., Reinsel, G. C., Tiao., G. C., Meng, X.-L., Choi, D., Cheang, W.-K., Keller, T., DeLuisi, J., Wuebbels, D. J., Kerr, J. B., Miller, A. J., Oltmans, S. J., and Frederick, J. E.: Factors affecting the detection of trends: Statistical considerations and applications to environmental data, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 17149–17161, 1998. World Health Organisation (WHO): Global Solar UV Index: A Practical Guide, 28 pp., ISBN 92-4-159007-6, Geneva, Switzerland, 2002, available at: http://www.unep.org/pdf/Solar_Index_Guide.pdf, 2002. World Meteorology Organisation (WMO): Report of the WMO-WHO meeting of experts on standardization of UV Indices and their dissemination to the public, Global Atmos. Watch Rep. 127, Geneva, Switzerland, 1998. World Meteorological Organization (WMO): Scientific assessment of ozone depletion: 2002, Global Ozone Res. Monit. Proj. Rep.. 47, 498 pp., Geneva, Switzerland, 2003. World Meteorological Organization (WMO): Scientific assessment of ozone depletion: 2006, Global Ozone Res. Monit. Proj. Rep. 50, 572 pp., Geneva, Switzerland, 2007. World Meteorology Organisation (WMO): Scientific assessment of ozone depletion: 2010, Global Ozone Res. Monit. Proj. Rep. 52, 516 pp., Geneva, Switzerland, 2011.