References

ACP

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

ACP

1680-7324

Copernicus GmbH

Göttingen, Germany

10.5194/acp-11-1143-2011

A global survey of aerosol-liquid water cloud overlap based on four years of CALIPSO-CALIOP data

Devasthale

¹ Thomas

M. A.

Remote Sensing Division, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Norrköping, Sweden

Air Quality Division, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Norrköping, Sweden

10 02 2011

11 3 1143 1154

This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/1143/2011/acp-11-1143-2011.html

The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/1143/2011/acp-11-1143-2011.pdf

Simulating the radiative impacts of aerosols located above liquid water clouds presents a significant challenge. In particular, absorbing aerosols, such as smoke, may have significant impact in such situations and even change the sign of net radiative forcing. It is not possible to reliably obtain information on such overlap events from existing passive satellite sensors. However, the CALIOP instrument onboard NASA's CALIPSO satellite allows us to examine these events with unprecedented accuracy. Using four years of collocated CALIPSO 5 km Aerosol and Cloud Layer Version 3 Products (June 2006–May 2010), we quantify, for the first time, the characteristics of overlapping aerosol and water cloud layers globally. We investigate seasonal variability in these characteristics over six latitude bands to understand the hemispheric differences when all aerosol types are included in the analysis (the AAO case). We also investigate frequency of smoke aerosol-cloud overlap (the SAO case). Globally, the frequency is highest during the JJA months in the AAO case, while for the SAO case, it is highest in the SON months. The seasonal mean overlap frequency can regionally exceed 20% in the AAO case and 10% in the SAO case. In about 5–10% cases the vertical distance between aerosol and cloud layers is less than 100 m, while about in 45–60% cases it less than a kilometer in the annual means for different latitudinal bands. In about 70–80% cases, aerosol layers are less than a kilometer thick, while in about 18–22% cases they are 1–2 km thick. The frequency of aerosol layers 2–3 km thick is about 4–5% in the tropical belts during overlap events. Over the regions where high aerosol loadings are present, the overlap frequency can be up to 50% higher when quality criteria on aerosol/cloud feature detection are relaxed. Over the polar regions, more than 50% of the overlapping aerosol layers have optical thickness less than 0.02, but the contribution from the relatively optically thicker aerosol layers increases towards the equatorial regions in both hemispheres. The results suggest that the frequency of occurrence of overlap events is far from being negligible globally.

References 1

Andreae, M. O., Artaxo, P., Fischer, H., Freitas, S. R., Grégoire, J.-M., Hansel, A., Hoor, P., Kormann, R., Krejci, R., Lange, L., Lelieveld, J., Lindinger, W., Longo, K., Peters, W., de Reus, M., Scheeren, B., Silva Dias, M. A. F., Ström, J., van Velthoven, P. F. J., and Williams, J.: Transport of biomass burning smoke to the upper troposphere by deep convection in the equatorial region, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28(6), 951954, doi:10.1029/2000GL012391, 2001.

Brioude, J., Cooper, O. R., Feingold, G., Trainer, M., Freitas, S. R., Kowal, D., Ayers, J. K., Prins, E., Minnis, P., McKeen, S. A., Frost, G. J., and Hsie, E.-Y.: Effect of biomass burning on marine stratocumulus clouds off the California coast, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8841–8856, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8841-2009doi:10.5194/acp-9-8841-2009, 2009.

Carslaw, K. S., Boucher, O., Spracklen, D. V., Mann, G. W., Rae, J. G. L., Woodward, S., and Kulmala, M.: A review of natural aerosol interactions and feedbacks within the Earth system, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1701–1737, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1701-2010doi:10.5194/acp-10-1701-2010, 2010.

Chand, D., Anderson, T. L., Wood, R., Charlson, R. J., Hu, Y., Liu, Z., and Vaughan, M.: Quantifying above-cloud aerosol using spaceborne lidar for improved understanding of cloudy-sky direct climate forcing, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D13206, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009433doi:10.1029/2007JD009433, 2008.

Chand, D., Wood, R., Anderson, T. L., Satheesh S. K., and Charlson, R. J.: Satellite-derived direct radiative effect of aerosols dependent on cloud cover, Nat. Geosci., 2, 181–184, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/NGEO437doi:10.1038/NGEO437, 2009.

Devasthale, A., Will�n, U., Karlsson, K.-G., and Jones, C. G.: Quantifying the clear-sky temperature inversion frequency and strength over the Arctic Ocean during summer and winter seasons from AIRS profiles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5565–5572, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5565-2010doi:10.5194/acp-10-5565-2010, 2010.

reitas, S. R., Longo, K. M., Silvia Dias, M. A. F., Silva Dias, P. L., Chatfield, R., Prins, E., Artaxo, P., Grell G. A., and Recuero, F. S.: Monitoring the transport of biomass burning emissions in South America, Environ. Fluid Dyn., 5, 135–167, 2005.

Hu, Y., Winker, D., Vaughan, M., Lin, B., Omar, A., Trepte, C., Flittner, D., Yang, P., Nasiri, S. L., Baum, B., Sun, W., Liu, Z., Wang, Z., Young, S., Stamnes, K., Huang, J., Kuehn, R., and Holz, R.: CALIPSO/CALIOP cloud phase discrimination algorithm, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 26, 2293–2309, 2009.

Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change (IPCC), The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC 916, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007.

Koren, I., Remer, L. A., Kaufman, Y. J., Rudich, Y., and Martins, J. V.: On the twilight zone between clouds and aerosols, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L08805, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029253doi:10.1029/2007GL029253, 2007.

Koren, I., Oreopoulos, L., Feingold, G., Remer, L. A., and Altaratz, O.: How small is a small cloud?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 3855–3864, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-3855-2008doi:10.5194/acp-8-3855-2008, 2008.

Liu, Z., Vaughan, M. A., Winker, D. M., Kittaka, C., Kuehn, R. E., Getzewich, B. J., Trepte, C. R., and Hostetler, C. A.: The CALIPSO Lidar Cloud and Aerosol Discrimination: Version 2 Algorithm and Initial Assessment of Performance, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 26, 1198–1213, http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1229.1doi:10.1175/2009JTECHA1229.1, 2009.

Lohmann, U. and Feichter, J.: Global indirect aerosol effects: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 715–737, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-715-2005doi:10.5194/acp-5-715-2005, 2005.

Omar, A., Winker, D., Kittaka, C., Vaughan, M., Liu, Z., Hu, Y., Trepte, C., Rogers, R., Ferrare, R., Kuehn, R., Hostetler, C.: The CALIPSO Automated Aerosol Classification and Lidar Ratio Selection Algorithm, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 26, 1994–2014, http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/2009JTECHA1231.1doi:10.1175/2009JTECHA1231.1, 2009.

Peters, K., Quaas, J., and Bellouin, N.: Effects of absorbing aerosols in cloudy skies: a satellite study over the Atlantic Ocean, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 9, 20853–20880, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acpd-9-20853-2009doi:10.5194/acpd-9-20853-2009, 2009.

Podgorny, I. A. and Ramanathan, V.: A modeling study of the direct effect of aerosols over the tropical Indian Ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 24097–24105, 2001.

Quaas, J., Ming, Y., Menon, S., Takemura, T., Wang, M., Penner, J. E., Gettelman, A., Lohmann, U., Bellouin, N., Boucher, O., Sayer, A. M., Thomas, G. E., McComiskey, A., Feingold, G., Hoose, C., Kristjánsson, J. E., Liu, X., Balkanski, Y., Donner, L. J., Ginoux, P. A., Stier, P., Grandey, B., Feichter, J., Sednev, I., Bauer, S. E., Koch, D., Grainger, R. G., Kirkevåg, A., Iversen, T., Seland, \O., Easter, R., Ghan, S. J., Rasch, P. J., Morrison, H., Lamarque, J.-F., Iacono, M. J., Kinne, S., and Schulz, M.: Aerosol indirect effects - general circulation model intercomparison and evaluation with satellite data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8697–8717, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8697-2009doi:10.5194/acp-9-8697-2009, 2009a.

Quaas, J., Stevens, B., Stier, P., and Lohmann, U.: Interpreting the cloud cover - aerosol optical depth relationship found in satellite data using a general circulation model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6129–6135, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6129-2010doi:10.5194/acp-10-6129-2010, 2010b.

Remer, L. A., Kleidman, R. G., Levy, R. C., Kaufman, Y. J., Tanré , D., Mattoo, S., Vanderlei Martins, J., Ichoku, C., Koren, I., Yu, H., and Holben, B. N.: Global aerosol climatology from the MODIS satellite sensors, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D14S07, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009661doi:10.1029/2007JD009661, 2008.

Satheesh, S. K., Krishna Moorthy, K., Kaufman, Y. J., and Takemura, T.: Aerosol optical depth, physical properties and radiative forcing over the Arabian Sea, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 91, 45–62, 2006.

Stevens, B. and Feingold, G.: Untangling aerosol effects on clouds and precipitation in a buffered system, Nature, 461, 607–613, 2009.

Vaughan, M., Powell, K., Kuehn, R., Young, S., Winker, D., Hostetler, C., Hunt, W., Liu, Z., McGill, M., and Getzewich, B.: Fully Automated Detection of Cloud and Aerosol Layers in the CALIPSO Lidar Measurements, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 26, 2034–2050, http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1228.1doi:10.1175/2009JTECHA1228.1, 2009.

Waquet, F., J. Riedi, L. C. Labonnote, AND P. Goloub, B. Cairns, J.-L. Deuze, and D. Tanre, Aerosol Remote Sensing over Clouds Using A-Train Observations, J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 2468-2480, 2009.

Wilcox, E. Harshvardhan, M., and Platnick, S.: Estimate of the impact of absorbing aerosol over cloud on the MODIS retrievals of cloud optical thickness and effective radius using two independent retrievals of liquid water path, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D05210, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010589doi:10.1029/2008JD010589, 2009.

Winker, D. M., Vaughan, M. A., Omar, A. H., Hu, Y., Powell, K. A., Liu, Z., Hunt, W. H., and Young, S. A.: Overview of the CALIPSO Mission and CALIOP Data Processing Algorithms, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 26, 2310–2323, http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1281.1doi:10.1175/2009JTECHA1281.1, 2009.

Young, S. A. and Vaughan, M. A.: The retrieval of profiles of particulate extinction from Cloud Aerosol Lidar Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) data: Algorithm description, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 26, 1105–1119, http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/2008JTECHA1221.1doi:10.1175/2008JTECHA1221.1, 2009.