1Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
2NASA GISS, New York, NY, USA
3Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
4Institute of Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
5Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
6Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
7Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research, Karlsruhe, Germany
8Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, USA
9Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA
10Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
11Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
*now at: Department of Energy, DC, USA
Received: 22 Sep 2010 – Published in Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.: 13 Oct 2010
Abstract. We use global models to explore the microphysical effects of carbonaceous aerosols on liquid clouds. Although absorption of solar radiation by soot warms the atmosphere, soot may cause climate cooling due to its contribution to cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and therefore cloud brightness. Six global models conducted three soot experiments; four of the models had detailed aerosol microphysical schemes. The average cloud radiative response to biofuel soot (black and organic carbon), including both indirect and semi-direct effects, is −0.11 Wm−2, comparable in size but opposite in sign to the respective direct effect. In a more idealized fossil fuel black carbon experiment, some models calculated a positive cloud response because soot provides a deposition sink for sulfuric and nitric acids and secondary organics, decreasing nucleation and evolution of viable CCN. Biofuel soot particles were also typically assumed to be larger and more hygroscopic than for fossil fuel soot and therefore caused more negative forcing, as also found in previous studies. Diesel soot (black and organic carbon) experiments had relatively smaller cloud impacts with five of the models <±0.06 Wm−2 from clouds. The results are subject to the caveats that variability among models, and regional and interrannual variability for each model, are large. This comparison together with previously published results stresses the need to further constrain aerosol microphysical schemes. The non-linearities resulting from the competition of opposing effects on the CCN population make it difficult to extrapolate from idealized experiments to likely impacts of realistic potential emission changes.
Revised: 17 Jan 2011 – Accepted: 21 Jan 2011 – Published: 07 Feb 2011
Koch, D., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S. E., Easter, R. C., Ferrachat, S., Ghan, S. J., Hoose, C., Iversen, T., Kirkevåg, A., Kristjansson, J. E., Liu, X., Lohmann, U., Menon, S., Quaas, J., Schulz, M., Seland, Ø., Takemura, T., and Yan, N.: Soot microphysical effects on liquid clouds, a multi-model investigation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1051-1064, doi:10.5194/acp-11-1051-2011, 2011.