1Joint Center for Earth Systems Technology, University of Maryland Baltimore County, 5523 Research Park Dr., Suite 320, Baltimore, MD 21228, USA
2NOAA NESDIS ORA, 5200 Auth Road, Camp Springs, MD, USA
3NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23693, USA
Received: 07 Mar 2010 – Published in Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.: 06 May 2010
Abstract. We present in this paper an alternative retrieval algorithm for the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) tropospheric Carbon Monoxide (CO) products using the Optimal Estimation (OE) technique, which is different from the AIRS operational algorithm. The primary objective for this study was to compare AIRS CO, as well as the other retrieval properties such as the Averaging Kernels (AKs), the Degrees of Freedom for Signal (DOFS), and the error covariance matrix, against the Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) and the Measurement of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) CO, which were also derived using the OE technique. We also demonstrate that AIRS OE CO results are much more realistic than AIRS V5 operational CO, especially in the lower troposphere and in the Southern Hemisphere (SH). These products are validated with in situ profiles obtained by the Differential Absorption Carbon Monoxide Measurements (DACOM), which took place as part of NASA's Intercontinental Chemical Transport Experiment (INTEX-B) field mission that was conducted over the northern Pacific in Spring 2006. To demonstrate the differences existing in the current operational products we first show a detailed direct comparison between AIRS V5 and TES operational V3 CO for the global datasets from December 2005 to July 2008. We then present global CO comparisons between AIRS OE, TES V3, and MOPITT V4 at selected pressure levels as well as for the total column amounts. We conclude that the tropospheric CO retrievals from AIRS OE and TES V3 agree to within 5–10 ppbv or 5% on average globally and throughout the free troposphere. The agreements in total column CO amounts between AIRS OE and MOPITT V4 have improved significantly compared to AIRS V5 with global relative RMS differences now being 12.7%.
Revised: 25 Sep 2010 – Accepted: 28 Sep 2010 – Published: 08 Oct 2010
Warner, J. X., Wei, Z., Strow, L. L., Barnet, C. D., Sparling, L. C., Diskin, G., and Sachse, G.: Improved agreement of AIRS tropospheric carbon monoxide products with other EOS sensors using optimal estimation retrievals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9521-9533, doi:10.5194/acp-10-9521-2010, 2010.