References

ACP

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

ACP

1680-7324

Copernicus GmbH

Göttingen, Germany

10.5194/acp-10-7845-2010

Updraft and downdraft characterization with Doppler lidar: cloud-free versus cumuli-topped mixed layer

Ansmann

¹ Fruntke

¹ Engelmann

Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, Permoserstr. 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany

24 08 2010

10 16 7845 7858

This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/10/7845/2010/acp-10-7845-2010.html

The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/10/7845/2010/acp-10-7845-2010.pdf

For the first time, a comprehensive, height-resolved Doppler lidar study of updrafts and downdrafts in the mixing layer is presented. The Doppler lidar measurements were performed at Leipzig, Germany, in the summer half year of 2006. The conditional sampling method is applied to the measured vertical velocities to identify, count, and analyze significant updraft and downdraft events. Three cases of atmospheric boundary-layer (ABL) evolution with and without fair-weather cumuli formation are discussed. Updrafts occur with an average frequency of 1–2 per unit length zi (boundary-layer depth zi), downdrafts 20–30% more frequently. In the case with cumuli formation, the draft occurrence frequency is enhanced by about 50% at cloud level or near cloud base. The counted updraft events cover 30–34%, downdrafts 53–57% of the velocity time series in the central part of the ABL (subcloud layer) during the main period of convective activity. By considering all drafts with horizontal extent >36 m in the analysis, the updraft mean horizontal extent ranges here from 200–420 m and is about 0.16 zi–0.18 zi in all three cases disregarding the occurrence of cumulus clouds. Downdraft extents are a factor of 1.3–1.5 larger. The average value of the updraft mean vertical velocities is 0.5–0.7 m/s or 0.40 w*–0.45 w* (convective velocity scale w*), and the negative downdraft mean vertical velocities are weaker by roughly 10–20%. The analysis of the relationship between the size (horizontal extent) of the updrafts and downdrafts and their mean vertical velocity reveals a pronounced increase of the average vertical velocity in updrafts from 0.4–0.5 m/s for small thermals (100–200 m) to about 1.5 m/s for large updrafts (>600 m) in the subcloud layer in the case with fair-weather cumuli. At cloudless conditions, the updraft velocities were found to be 20% smaller for the large thermals.

References 1

Angevine, W M.: An integrated turbulence scheme for boundary layers with shallow cumulus applied to pollutant transports, J. Appl. Meteorol., 44, 1436–1452, 2005.

Ansmann, A., Tesche, M., Knippertz, P., Bierwirth, E., Althausen, D., Müller, D., and Schulz, O.: Vertical profiling of convective dust plumes in southern Morocco during SAMUM, Tellus B, 61, 340–353, 2009.

Baars, H., Ansmann, A., Engelmann, R., and Althausen, D.: Continuous monitoring of the boundary-layer top with lidar, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 7281-7296, doi:10.5194/acp-8-7281-2008, 2008.

Bösenberg, J. and Linné, H.: Laser remote sensing of the planetary boundary layer, Meteorol. Z., 11, 233–240, 2002.

Cotton, W R., Alexander, G D., Hertenstein, R., Walko, R L., McAnelly, R L., and Nicholls, M.: Cloud venting – a review and some new global annual estimates, Earth-Sci. Rev., 39, 169–206, 1995.

Dabas, A M., Dobrinski, P., and Flamant, P H.: Chirp-induced bias in velocity measurements by a coherent Doppler CO2 lidar, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 15, 407–415, 1998.

Drobinski, P., Carlotti, P., Newsom, R K., Banta, R M., Foster, R C., and Redelsperger, J.-L.: The structure of the near-neutral atmospheric surface layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 699–714, 2004.

Durand, P., Thoumieux, F., and Lambert, D.: Turbulent length-scales in the marine atmospheric mixed layer, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 126, 1889–1912, 2000.

Engelmann, R.: Aerosol vertical exchange in the convective planetary boundary layer, Dissertation, University of Leipzig, Germany, 2009.

Engelmann, R., Wandinger, U., Ansmann, A., Müller, D., \protectŽeromskis, E., Althausen, D., and Wehner, B.: Lidar observations of the vertical aerosol flux in the planetary boundary layer, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 25, 1296–1306, 2008.

Frehlich, R.: Estimation of velocity error for Doppler lidar measurements, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 18, 1628–1639, 2001.

Fruntke, J.: Charakterisierung der Grenzschicht anhand von Vertikalwindmessungen mit einem Doppler-Lidar, (Characterization of the boundary layer by means of vertical wind measurements with Doppler lidar), Diploma thesis, University of Leipzig, Germany, 2009.

Gibert, F., Cuesta, J., Yano, J.-I., Arnault, N., and Flamant, P H.: On the correlation between convective plume updrafts and downdrafts, lidar reflectivity and depolarization ratio, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 125, 553–573, 2007.

Godowitch, J M.: Characteristics of vertical turbulent velocities in the urban convective boundary layer, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 35, 387–407, 1986.

Greenhut, G K. and Khalsa, S. J S.: Updraft and downdraft events in the atmospheric boundary layer over the equatorial Pacific Ocean, J. Atmos. Sci., 39, 1803–1817, 1982.

Greenhut, G K. and Khalsa, S. J S.: Convective elements in the marine atmospheric boundary layer. Part I: conditional sampling studies, J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol., 26, 813–822, 1987.

Grund, C J., Banta, R M., George, J L., Howell, J N., Post, M J., Richter, R A., and Weickmann, A M.: High-resolution Doppler lidar for boundary layer and cloud research, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 18, 376–393, 2001.

Heus, T., Pols, C. F J., Jonker, H. J J., van den Acker, H. E A., and Lenschow, D H.: Observational validation of the compensating mass flux through the shell around cumulus clouds, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 135, 101–112, 2009.

Hogan, R J., Grant, A. L M., Illingworth, A J., Pearson, G N., and O'Connor, E J.: Vertical velocity variance and skewness in clear and cloud-topped boundary layers as revealed by Doppler lidar, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 135, 635–643, 2009.

Jakob, C. and Siebesma, A P.: A new subcloud model for mass-flux convection schemes: Influence on triggering, updraft properties, and model climate, Mon. Weather Rev., 131, 2765–2778, 2003.

Khalsa, S. J S. and Greenhut, G K.: Conditional sampling of updrafts and downdrafts in the marine atmospheric boundary layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 42, 2550–2562, 1985.

Kollias, P., Albrecht, B A., Lhermitte, R., and Savtchenko, A.: Radar observations of updrafts, downdrafts, and turbulence in fair-weather cumuli, J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 1750–1766, 2001.

Lenschow, D H.: Airplane boundary layer structure, J. Appl. Meteorol., 9, 874–884, 1970.

Lenschow, D H. and Stephens, P L.: The role of thermals in the convective boundary layer, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 19, 509–532, 1980.

Lenschow, D H. and Stephens, P L.: Mean vertical velocity and turbulence intensity inside and outside thermals, Atmos. Environ., 16, 61–64, 1982.

Lenschow, D H., Mann, J., and Kristensen, L.: How long is long enough when measuring fluxes and other turbulence statistics?, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 11, 661–673, 1994.

Lothon, M., Lenschow, D H., and Mayor, S D.: Coherence and scale of vertical velocity in the convective boundary layer from Doppler lidar, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 35, 387–407, 2006.

Moeng, C.-H. and Rotunno, R.: Vertical-velocity skewness in the buoyancy-driven boundary layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 47, 1149–1162, 1990.

Patton, E G., Sullivan, P P., and Moeng, C.-H.: The influence of idealized heterogeneity on wet and dry planetary boundary layers coupled to the land surface, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 2078–2097, 2005.

Said, F., Canut, G., Durand, P., Lohou, F., and Lothon, M.: Seasonal evolution of boundary-layer turbulence measured by aircraft during the AMMA 2006 Special Observation Period, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 135, 595–617, 2009.

Schumann, U. and Moeng, C.-H.: Plume fluxes in clear and cloudy convective boundary layers, J. Atmos. Sci., 48, 1746–1757, 1991.

Seifert, P., Engelmann, R., Ansmann, A., Wandinger, U., Mattis, I., Althausen, D., and Fruntke, J.: Characterization of specular reflections in mixed-phase and ice clouds based on scanning, polarization, and Raman lidar, in: Reviewed and revised papers presented at the 24th International Laser Radar Conference, 23–28 June 2008, Boulder, Colorado, USA, edited by: Hardesty, M. and Mayor, S., 571–574, NOAA, Boulder, CO, USA, ISBN 978-0-615-21489-4, 2008.

Soares, P. M M., Miranda, P. M A., Siebesma, A P., and Teixeira, J.: An eddy-diffusivity/mass-flux parametrization for dry and shallow cumulus convection, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 130, 3365–3383, 2004.

Spindler, G., Teichmann, U., and Sutton, M A.: Ammonia dry deposition over grassland – micrometeorological flux-gradient measurements and bi-directional flux calculations using an inferential model, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 127, 795–814, 2001.

Stull, R B.: An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 666 pp., 1988.

van Heerwaarden, C C. and Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, J.: Relative humidity as an indicator for cloud formation over heterogeneous land surfaces, J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 3263–3277, 2008.

Verzijlbergh, R A., Jonker, H. J J., Heus, T., and Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, J.: Turbulent dispersion in cloud-topped boundary layers, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 1289–1302, doi:10.5194/acp-9-1289-2009, 2009.

Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, J., Kim, S.-W., Barth, M C., and Patton, E G.: Transport and chemical transformations influenced by shallow cumulus over land, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 3219–3231, doi:10.5194/acp-5-3219-2005, 2005.

Wendisch, M., Hellmuth, O., Ansmann, A., Heintzenberg, J., Engelmann, R., Althausen, D., Eichler, H., Müller, D., Hu, M., Zhang, Y., and Mao, J.: Radiative and dynamic effects of absorbing aerosol particles over the Pearl River Delta, China, Atmos. Environ., 42, 6405–6416, 2008.

Wilde, N P., Stull, R B., and Eloranta, E W.: The LCL zone and cumulus onset, J. Climate Appl. Meteorology, 24, 640–657, 1985.

Williams, A G. and Hacker, J M.: The composite shape and structure of coherent eddies in the convective boundary layer, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 61, 213–245, 1992.

Wulfmeyer, V. and Janjić, T.: Twenty-four-hour observations of the marine boundary layer using shipborne NOAA High-resolution Doppler lidar, J. Appl. Meteorol., 44, 1723–1744, 2005.

Wulfmeyer, V., Randall, M., Brewer, A., and Hardesty, R M.: 2-μm Doppler lidar transmitter with high frequency stability and low chirp, Opt. Lett., 25, 1228–1230, 2000.

Young, G S.: Turbulence structure of the convective boundary layer. Part I: variability of normalized turbulence statistics, J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 719–726, 1988a.

Young, G S.: Turbulence structure of the convective boundary layer. Part II: Phoenix 78 aircraft observations of thermals and their environment, J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 727–735, 1988b.

Young, G S.: Convection in the atmospheric boundary layer, Earth-Sci. Rev., 25, 179–198, 1988c.

Yu, H., Liu, S C., and Dickerson, R E.: Radiative effects of aerosols on the evolution of the atmospheric boundary layer, J. Geophys. Res., 107(D12), 4142, \doi10.1029/2001JD00754, 2002.