<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/inc/acp/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7316</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7324</eissn>
		<volume_number>10</volume_number>
		<issue_number>2</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2010</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acp-10-769-2010</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/10/769/2010/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/10/769/2010/acp-10-769-2010.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/10/769/2010/acp-10-769-2010.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>769</start_page>
	<end_page>775</end_page>
	<publication_date>2010-01-26</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Weather response to a large wind turbine array</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>D. B. Barrie</name>
			<email>dbarrie@atmos.umd.edu</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>D. B. Kirk-Davidoff</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">University of Maryland Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, College Park, MD, USA</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">Electrical generation by wind turbines is increasing rapidly, and has been
projected to satisfy 15% of world electric demand by 2030. The extensive
installation of wind farms would alter surface roughness and significantly
impact the atmospheric circulation due to the additional surface roughness
forcing. This forcing could be changed deliberately by adjusting the
attitude of the turbine blades with respect to the wind, which would enable
the &quot;management&quot; of a large array of wind turbines. Using a General
Circulation Model (GCM), we represent a continent-scale wind farm as a
distributed array of surface roughness elements. Here we show that initial
disturbances caused by a step change in roughness grow within four and a
half days such that the flow is altered at synoptic scales. The growth rate
of the induced perturbations is largest in regions of high atmospheric
instability. For a roughness change imposed over North America, the induced
perturbations involve substantial changes in the track and development of
cyclones over the North Atlantic, and the magnitude of the perturbations
rises above the level of forecast uncertainty.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Archer, C. L. and Jacobson, M. Z.: Evaluation of global wind power, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D12110, doi:10.1029/2004JD005462. 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Aubrey, C., Pullen, A., Zervos, A., and Teske, S.: Global wind energy outlook 2006, Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC), Brussels, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Baidya Roy, S., Pacala, S. W., and Walko, R. L.: Can wind farms affect local meteorology?, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D19101, doi:10.1029/2004JD004763, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Barlage, M. and Zeng, X.: The effects of observed fractional vegetation cover on the land surface climatology of the community land model, J. Hydrometeorol., 5, 823–830, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Collins, W. D., Rasch, P. J., Boville, B. A., et al.: Description of the NCAR Community Atmosphere Model (CAM~3.0), NCAR technical note, NCAR/TN-464+STR, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Collins, W. D., Bitz, C. M., Blackmon, M. L., et al.: The community climate system model version~3 (CCSM3), J. Climate, 19, 2122–2143, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Department of Energy: Wind Energy for Rural Economic Development, United States Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Washington, DOE/GO-102004-1826, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Department of Energy: 20% wind energy by 2030 increasing wind energy&apos;s contribution to the U.S. electricity supply, United States Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Washington, DOE/GO-102008-2567, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Dorman, L. E., Khilji, N., Sastri, B., et al.: International Energy Outlook 2007, United States Department of Energy, Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting, Washington, DOE/EIA-0484(2007), 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Elliott, D., Holladay, C. G., Barchet, W. R., Foote, H. P., and Sandusky, W. F.: Wind energy resource atlas of the United States, Department of Energy, DOE/CH 10093-4, 1986. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Elliott, D. L., Wendell, L. L., and Gower, G. L.: An Assessment of the Available Windy Land Area and Wind Energy Potential in the Contiguous United States, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, PNL-7789, 1991. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Frandsen, S.: Turbulence and turbulence-generated structural loading in wind turbin clusters, Riso National Laboratory, Riso-R-1188(EN), 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Hoffman, R. N.: Controlling the global weather, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 83, 241–248, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Hoffman, R. N., Henderson, J. M., Leidner, S. M., Grassotti, C., and Nehrkorn, T.: The response of damaging winds of a simulated tropical cyclone to finite-amplitude perturbations of different variables, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 1924–1937, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Keith, D., DeCarolis, J. F., Denkenberger, D. C., et al.: The influence of large-scale wind power on global climate, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 16115–16120, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Kirk-Davidoff, D. B. and Keith, D.: On the climate impact of surface roughness anomalies, J. Atmos. Sci., 85, 2215–2234, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Kwa, C.: The rise and fall of weather modification: changes in American attitudes towards technology, nature, and society, Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance, 1st ed., edited by: Miller, C., pp. 135–165, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Langmuir, I.: Control of precipitation from cumulus clouds by various seeding techniques, Science, 112, 35–41, 1950. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Lettau, H.: Note on aerodynamic roughness-parameter estimation on the basis of roughness-element description, J. Appl. Meteorol., 8, 828–832, 1969. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Lorenz, E. N.: Deterministic nonperiodic flow, J. Atmos. Sci., 20, 130–141, 1963. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Lorenz, E. N.: Atmospheric predictability as revealed by naturally occurring analogues, J. Atmos. Sci., 26, 636–646, 1969. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Lu, X., McElroy, M., and Kiviluoma, J.: Global potential for wind-generated electricity, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 10933–10938, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> Macdonald, R. W., Griffiths, R. F., and Hall, D. J.: An improved method for the estimation of surface roughness of obstacle arrays, Atmos. Environ., 32, 1857–1864, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> Medici, D.: Wind turbine wakes – control and vortex shedding, KTM Mechanics, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text"> Pacala, S. and Socolow, R.: Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies, Science, 305, 968–972, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="26" content_type="text"> Petersen, R.: A wind tunnel evaluation of methods for estimating surface roughness length at industrial facilities, Atmos. Environ., 31, 45–57, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="27" content_type="text"> Schaefer, V. J.: The production of ice crystals in a cloud of supercooled water droplets, Science, 104, 457–459, 1946. </reference>
		<reference numeration="28" content_type="text"> Schubert, S. D. and Suarez, M.: Dynamical predictability in a simple general circulation model: average error growth, J. Atmos. Sci., 46, 353–370, 1989. </reference>
		<reference numeration="29" content_type="text"> Toth, Z. and Kalnay, E.: Ensemble forecasting at NMC: the generation of perturbations, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 74, 2317–2330, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="30" content_type="text"> Willoughby, H. E., Jorgensen, D. P., Black, R. A., and Rosenthal, S. L.: Project Stormfury: a scientific chronicle, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 66, 505–514, 1985. </reference>
		<reference numeration="31" content_type="text"> Wiser, R. and Bolinger, M.: Annual report on U.S. wind power installation, cost, and performance trends: 2006, United States Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Washington, DOE/GO-102007-2433, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="32" content_type="text"> Vermeer, L. J., Sorensen, J. N., and Crespo, A.: Wind turbine wake aerodynamics, Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 39, 467–510, 2003. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

