ACP Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics ACP 1680-7324 Copernicus GmbH Göttingen, Germany 10.5194/acp-10-3385-2010 Sensitivity of tracer transport to model resolution, prescribed meteorology and tracer lifetime in the general circulation model ECHAM5 Aghedo A. M. 1 2 Rast S. 1 Schultz M. G. 1 3 Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany now at: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA now at: ICG-2, Research centre, Jülich, Germany 12 04 2010 10 7 3385 3396 This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/10/3385/2010/acp-10-3385-2010.html The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/10/3385/2010/acp-10-3385-2010.pdf

Atmospheric transport of traces gases and aerosols plays an important role in the distribution of air pollutants and radiatively active compounds. For model simulations of chemistry-climate interactions it is important to know how the transport of tracers depends on the geographical resolution of the general circulation model. However, this aspect has been scarcely investigated until now. Here, we analyse tracer transport in the ECHAM5 general circulation model using 6 independent idealized tracers with constant lifetimes, which are released in two different altitudes at the surface and in the stratosphere, respectively. Model resolutions from T21L19 to T106L31 were tested by performing multi-annual simulations with prescribed sea surface temperatures and sea ice fields of the 1990s. The impacts of the tracer lifetime were investigated by varying the globally uniform exponential decay time between 0.5 and 50 months. We also tested the influence of using prescribed meteorological fields (ERA40) instead of climatological sea surface temperature and sea ice fields. Meridional transport of surface tracers decreases in the coarse resolution model due to enhanced vertical mixing, with the exception of the advection into the tropical region, which shows an inconsistent trend between the resolutions. Whereas, the meridional transport of tracers released in the stratosphere was enhanced with higher model resolutions, except in the transport from tropical stratosphere to the Southern Hemisphere, which exhibits an increase trend with increasing model resolution. The idealized tracers exhibit a seasonal cycle, which is modulated by the tracer lifetime. In comparison to the run with prescribed sea surface temperature and sea ice fields, the simulation with prescribed meteorological fields did not exhibit significant change in the meridional transport, except in the exchange of stratospheric tracers between both hemispheres, where it causes about 100% increase. The import of the surface tracers into the stratosphere is increased by up to a factor of 2.5, and the export from the stratosphere into the troposphere was increased by up to 60% when prescribed meteorological fields is used. The ERA40 simulation also showed larger interannual variability (up to 24% compared to 12% in the standard simulations). Using our surface tracers released in either the northern or Southern Hemisphere, respectively, we calculate inter-hemispheric transport times between 11 and 17 months, consistent with values reported in the literature. While this study cannot be used to relate differences in model results to specific changes in transport processes, it nevertheless provides some insight into the characteristics of tracer transport in the widely used ECHAM5 general circulation model.

 References Aghedo, A. M., Schultz, M. G. and S. Rast: The influence of African air pollution on regional and global tropospheric ozone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1193–1212, 2007. Asselin, R.: Frequency filter for time integrations. Mon. Weather Rev. 100, 487–490, 1972. Austin, J., Butchart N., and Swinbank, R.: Sensitivity of ozone and temperature to vertical resolution in a GCM with coupled stratospheric chemistry, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 123, 1405–1431, 1997. Bowman, K. P. and Carrie, G. D.: The mean-meridional transport circulation of the troposphere in an idealized GCM, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 1502–1514, 2001. Bowman, K. P. and Erukhimova, T.: Comparison of global-scale Lagrangian transport properties of the NCEP Reanalysis and CCM3, J. Climate, 17, 1135–1145, 2004. Czeplak, G. and Junge C.: Studies of interhemispheric exchange in the troposphere by a diffusion model, Adv. Geophys., 18B, 57–72, 1974. Denning, A. S., Holzer, M., Gurney, K. R., Heimann, M., Law, R. M., and coauthors: Three-dimensional transport and concentration of SF$_6$: A model intercomparison study (TransCom 2), Tellus 51B, 266–297, 1999. Derwent, R. G., Simmonds, P. G., Seuring, S., and Dimmer, C.: Observation and interpretation of the seasonal cycles in the surface concentrations of ozone and carbon monoxide at Mace Head, Ireland from 1990 to 1994, Atmos. Environ., 32(2), 145–157, 1998. Gates W. L., Boyle, J. S., Covey, C., Dease, C. G., Doutriaux, C. M., Drach, R. S., M. Fiorino, M., Gleckler, P. J., J. J. Hnilo, J. J., Marlais, S. M., Phillips, T. J., Potter, G. L., Santer, B. D., Sperber, K. R., Taylor, K. E., and Williams, D. N.: An Overview of the Results of the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP I). Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 80(1), pp. 2955, 1999. Genthon, C. and Armengaud, A.: Radon 222 as a comparative tracer of transport and mixing in two general circulation models of the atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 100(D2), 2849–2866, 1995. Gray, S. L.: A case study of stratosphere to troposphere transport: The role of convective transport and the sensitivity to model resolution, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D18), 4590, doi:10.1029/2002JD003317, 2003. Gurney, K. R., Law, R. M., Denning, A. S., Rayner, P. J., Baker, D. and coauthors.: Towards robust regional estimates of CO2 sources and sinks using atmospheric transport models, Nature 415, 626–630, 2002. Gurney, K. R., Law, R. M., Denning, A. S., Rayner, P. J., Baker, D. and coauthors: TransCom 3 CO<sub>2</sub> inversion intercomparison: 1. Annual mean control results and sensitivity to transport and prior flux information, Tellus 55B, 555–579, 2003. Hall, T. M., Waugh, D. W., Boering, K. A., and Plumb, R. A.: Evaluation of transport in stratospheric models, J. Geophys. Res., 104(D15), 18815–18839, 1999. Hoke, J. E. and Anthes, R. A.: The initialization of numerical models by a dynamic-initialization technique Mon. Weather Rev., 104(12), 1551–1556, 1976. Jacob, D. J., Prather, M. J., Rasch, P. J., Shia, R.-L., Balkanski, Y. J., Beagley, S. R., et al.: Evaluation and intercomparison of global atmospheric transport models using $^222$Rn and other short-lived tracers. J. Geophys. Res., 102(D5), 5953–5970, doi:10.1029/96JD02955, 1997. Jeuken, A. B. M., Siegmund, P. C., Heijboer, L. C., Feichter, J., and Bengtson, L.: On the potential of assimilating meteorological analysis in a climate model for the purpose of model validation, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 16939–16950, 1996. Kjellström, E., Feichter, J., and Hoffman, G.: Transport of SF$_6$ and $^14$CO<sub>2</sub> in the atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM4, Tellus 52B, 1–18, 2000. Lanser D. and Verwer, J.G.: Analysis of operator splitting for advection-diffusion-reaction problems from air pollution modelling, J. Comp. Appl. Math., 111, 201–216, 1999. Levin, I. and Hesshaimer, V.: Refining of atmospheric transport model entries by the globally observed passive tracer distribution of $^85$Krypton and sulfur hexafluoride (SF$_6$), J. Geophys. Res., 101(D11), 16745–16755, 1996. Lin, S.-J. and Rood, R. B.: Multidimensional Flux-Form Semi-Lagrangian Scheme. Mon. Wea. Rev., 124, 2046–2070, 1996. Lott, F., and M. J. Miller: A new subgrid-scale orographic drag parameterization: Its formulation and testing, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 123, 101–127, 1997. Mesinger, F. and Arakawa, A.: Numerical methods used in atmospheric models. Global Atmospheric Research Programme (GARP) Publication Series 17, World Meteorological Organisation, 1976. Nordeng, T. E.: Extended versions of the convective parameterization scheme at ECMWF and their impact on the mean and transient activity of the model in the tropics. Technical memorandum No. 206, European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), Reading, UK, 1994. Prather, M., McElroy, M., Wofsy, S., Russell, G., and Rind, D.: Chemistry of the global troposphere: Fluorocarbons as tracers of air motion, J. Geophys. Res. 92, 6579–6613, 1987. Robert, A. J.: A stable numerical integration scheme for the primitive meteorological equations, Atmos. Ocean., 19, 35–46, 1981. Robert, A. J.: A semi-Lagrangian and semi-implicit numerical integration fscheme for the primitive meteorological equations, J. Meteor. Soc. Jpn., 60, 319–325, 1982. Robert, A. J., Henderson, J. and Turnbull, C.: An implicit time integration scheme for baroclinic models in the atmosphere, Mon Weather Rev., 100, 329–335, 1972. Roeckner, E, G. Bäuml, L. Bonaventura, R. Brokopf, M. Esch, M. Giorgetta, S. Hagemann, I. Kirchner, L. Kornblueh, E. Manzini, A. Rhodin, U. Schlese, U. Schulzweida, A. Tompkins (2003): The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM 5. PART I: Model description, Max-Planck Institute for Meteorology report No 349, Hamburg, Germany, 127 pp., 2003. Roeckner, E, Brokopf, R., Esch, M., Giorgetta, M., Hagemann, S., Kornblueh, L., Manzini, E., Schlese, U., Schulzweida, U.: Sensitivity of simulated climate to horizontal and vertical resolution in the ECHAM5 atmosphere model, J. Climate, 19, 3771–3791, 2006. Simmons, A. J., Burridge, D. M., Jarraud, M., Girard, C., Wergen, W.: The ECMWF medium-range prediction models development of the numerical formulations and the impact of increased resolution, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 40, 28–60, doi:10.1007/BF01027467, 1989. Simmons, A. J and Burridge, D. M.: An energy and angular-momentum conserving vertical finite difference scheme and hybrid vertical coordinates, Mon. Weather Rev., 109, 758–766, 1981. Simmons, A. J. and Gibson, J. K.: ERA-40 Project plan. ERA40 project report series No 1, 63 pp, 2000. Stevenson, D. S., Dentener, F. J., Schultz, M. G., Ellingsen, K., van Noije, T. P. C., et al.: Multimodel ensemble simulations of present-day and near-future tropospheric ozone, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D08301, doi:10.1029/2005JD006338, 2006. Tiedtke, M.: A comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulus parameterization in large-scale models. Mon. Weather Rev., 117, 1779–1800, 1989. van Noije, T.P.C., Eskes, H. J., van Weele, M., and van Velthoven, P. F. J.: Implications of the enhanced Brewer-Dobson circulation in European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts reanalysis ERA-40 for the stratosphere troposphere exchange of ozone in global chemistry transport models, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D19308, doi:10.1029/2004JD004586, 2004. Wild, O. and Prather, M. J.: Global tropospheric ozone modelling: Quantifying errors due to grid resolution, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D11305, doi:10.1029/2005JD006605, 2006.