1School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-747, Korea
2Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, University of Tokyo, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8568, Japan
Received: 29 Aug 2010 – Discussion started: 24 Sep 2010
Abstract. Using one month of the cloud-resolving Nonhydrostatic Icosahedral Atmospheric Model (NICAM) simulations, we examined the impact of different definitions of clear-sky flux on the determination of longwave cloud radiative forcing (CRF). Because the satellite-like cloud-free composite preferentially samples drier conditions relative to the all-sky mean state, the conventional clear-sky flux calculation using the all-sky mean state in the model may represent a more humid atmospheric state in comparison to the cloud-free state. The drier bias is evident for the cloud-free composite in the NICAM simulations, causing an overestimation of the longwave CRF by about 10% compared to the NICAM simulated longwave CRF. Overall, water vapor contributions of up to 10% of the total longwave CRF should be taken account for making model-generated cloud forcing comparable to the satellite measurements.
Revised: 29 Nov 2010 – Accepted: 30 Nov 2010 – Published: 08 Dec 2010
Sohn, B. J., Nakajima, T., Satoh, M., and Jang, H.-S.: Impact of different definitions of clear-sky flux on the determination of longwave cloud radiative forcing: NICAM simulation results, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 11641-11646, doi:10.5194/acp-10-11641-2010, 2010.